Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Joseph and Heather Tell Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Education$11kRecreation & Sports$6kHuman Services$2kPhilanthropy$1kHousing & Shelter$506Public Safety & Disaster$500Youth Development$500Health$200Other$0
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$506
Median grant
2
States reached
$502
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCSD Foundation$5,000
Decatur Housing Auth-Ebster Swim Club$506
Coca-Cola Scholars Foundation$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Des Moines Area Religious Council: $100 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MA
SD
IA
PA
CA
NC
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13k · 6 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
12

Total granted

$13k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+44%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Northwestern University
    7× · 2017–2023 · $6k · revenue +41%
  • DE
    DECATUR EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $3k · revenue +16%
  • YO
    YMCA of Metropolitan Atlanta Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $2k

Funded once

  • OE
    OAKHURST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA INCgraduated
    5× · 2017–2021 · $720 · revenue +85%
  • PR
    PINE RIDGE RESERVATION EMERGENCY RELIEF
    3× · 2019–2021 · $500
  • GO
    Girls on the Run
    one grant, 2021 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
2
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation

To aid the alliance for clinical trials in oncology national clinical trials cooperative group and support the clinical trials and laboratory research of the alliance, as well as efforts to educate the medical community on methods of…

Health
3
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

4
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
5
American Association for Cancer Research Foundation

The american association for cancer research foundation accelerates progress in the conquest of cancer by providing financial support for scientific research, education and communication. the foundation funds programs deemed by the…

Health
6
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
7
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
8
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
9
Association of Legal Administrators

Ala is the catalyst for growth by providing: diverse educational experiences, engaged peer communities, strategic solutions, dynamic resources, and trusted networks.

10
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
11
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
12
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Baldrick's Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Lung Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATIONDECATUR EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $3,413 · EducationDECATUR EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCCOCA-COLA SCHOLARS FOUNDATION INC — $800 · EducationCOCA-COLA SCHOLARS FOUNDATION INCOAKHURST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA INC — $720 · EducationOAKHURST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA INCYMCA of Metropolitan Atlanta Inc — $1,500 · OtherYMCA of Metropolitan Atlanta I…Individual grant recipient — $1,220 · OtherIndividual grant recipient45 Academy at Fifth Avenue PTO — $985 · Other45 Academy at Fifth Avenue PTODecatur Housing Auth-Ebster Swim Club — $506 · OtherDecatur Housing Auth-Ebster Sw…PINE RIDGE RESERVATION EMERGENCY RELIEF — $500 · OtherPINE RIDGE RESERVATION EMERGEN…Girls on the Run — $500 · OtherGirls on the RunThe Trellis Fund — $200 · Other+3 more — $350 · Other+3 moreNorthwestern University — $5,500 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern UniversityWATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL — $100 · PhilanthropySwim Across America Inc — $100 · PhilanthropyPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND — $50 · PhilanthropyGEORGIA ALLIANCE FOR BREAST CANCER F/K/A IT'S THE JOURNEY — $100 · HealthDES MOINES AREA RELIGIOUS COUNCIL — $100 · Human ServicesATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $25 · Food & Nutrition
Education$9,933Other$5,761Recreation & Sports$5,500Philanthropy$250Health$100Human Services$100Food & Nutrition$25

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNorthwestern University — $5,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDECATUR EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $3,413 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCOCA-COLA SCHOLARS FOUNDATION INC — $800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA ALLIANCE FOR BREAST CANCER F/K/A IT'S THE JOURNEY — $100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSwim Across America Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDES MOINES AREA RELIGIOUS COUNCIL — $100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND — $50 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $25 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Northwestern University
  • Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DECATUR EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds COCA-COLA SCHOLARS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds OAKHURST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA INC
  • Who funds WATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds GEORGIA ALLIANCE FOR BREAST CANCER F/K/A IT'S THE JOURNEY
  • Who funds Swim Across America Inc
  • Who funds DES MOINES AREA RELIGIOUS COUNCIL
  • Who funds PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND
  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Joseph and Heather Tell Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph