Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph & Evelyn Richardson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$56kEducation$50kFood & Nutrition$48kAnimals$38kYouth Development$30kArts & Culture$17kPhilanthropy$15kReligion$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$349k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NOURISH FARMS$5,000
DOGS 2 DOGS TAGS$5,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS SHEBOYGAN COUNTY$5,000
SHARON S RICHARDSON COMMUNITY HOSPICE$5,000
SHEBOYGAN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOLARSHIPS$5,000
PRODUCTION FARMS$5,000
SHEBOYGAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$5,000
REINS$5,000
TAWSITISM$5,000
ANCHOR OF HOPE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%DOGS 2 DOGS TAGS: $10k → 9%THE PRODUCTION FARM OF NORTHEAST WI: $8k → 11%SHARON S RICHARDSON COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $10k → 9%SHARON S RICHARDSON COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $10k → 9%NOURISH FARMS: $5k → 9%REINS: $5k → 9%DOGS 2 DOGS TAGS: $5k → 9%SHARON S RICHARDSON COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $5k → 9%DOGS 2 DOGS TAGS: $5k → 9%SHARON S RICHARDSON COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $5k → 9%NOURISH FARMS: $5k → 9%NOURISH FARMS: $5k → 9%NOURISH FARMS: $5k → 9%NOURISH FARMS: $5k → 9%PRODUCTION FARMS: $5k → 9%SHEBOYGAN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOLARSHIPS: $5k → 9%PRODUCTION FARMS: $5k → 9%DOGS 2 DOGS TAGS: $5k → 9%SHARON S RICHARDSON COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $5k → 9%SHARON S RICHARDSON COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $5k → 9%DOGS 2 DOGS TAGS: $5k → 9%NOURISH FARMS: $5k → 9%DOGS 2 DOGS TAGS: $5k → 9%SHEBOYGAN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOLARSHIPS: $5k → 9%SHEBOYGAN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOLARSHIPS: $4k → 9%SHEBOYGAN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOLARSHIPS: $4k → 9%SHEBOYGAN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOLARSHIPS: $4k → 9%SHEBOYGAN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOLARSHIPS: $4k → 9%ACCESSIBLE KAYAK & CANOE LAUNCH CO SF LOONS CLUB: $3k → 9%ST PETER'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $3k → 9%REINS: $2k → 9%REINS: $2k → 9%REINS: $2k → 9%CAMP ANOKIJIG: $3k → 9%SHEBOYGAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $10k → 9%SHEBOYGAN AREA PAY IT FORWARD: $5k → 9%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS SHEBOYGAN COUNTY: $5k → 9%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS SHEBOYGAN COUNTY: $5k → 9%TAWSITISM: $5k → 9%SHEBOYGAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $5k → 9%CAMP EVERGREEN: $5k → 9%SHEBOYGAN AREA PAY IT FORWARD: $5k → 9%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS SHEBOYGAN COUNTY: $5k → 9%SHEBOYGAN AREA PAY IT FORWARD: $5k → 9%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS SHEBOYGAN CTY: $5k → 9%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS SHEBOYGAN COUNTY: $5k → 9%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS SHEBOYGAN COUNTY: $5k → 9%PAWSITISM: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$222k · 10 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +101% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$222k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+101%
+8%

Still filing today

60%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPublic BenefitFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SHARON S RICHARDSON COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +33%
  • DT
    Dogs to Dog Tags Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $35k · revenue +701%
  • NF
    NOURISH FARMS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE PRODUCTION FARM OF NORTHEAST WI
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS SHEBOYGAN CTY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • CAMP EVERGREEN CORPORATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHEBOYGAN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOLARSHIPS: $25,500 · OtherSHEBOYGAN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOLARSHIPSBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS WI SHORELINE INC: $25,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS WI SHORELINE INCSHEBOYGAN AREA PAY IT FORWARD INCORPORATED: $15,000 · OtherSHEBOYGAN AREA PAY IT FORWARD INCORPORATEDSHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL RESEARCH CENTERINC: $15,000 · OtherSHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL RESEARCH CENTERINCSHEBOYGAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $15,000 · OtherSHEBOYGAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOLPRODUCTION FARMS: $10,000 · OtherPRODUCTION FARMSTHE PRODUCTION FARM OF NORTHEAST WI: $7,500 · OtherTAWSITISM: $5,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS SHEBOYGAN CTY: $5,000 · OtherCAMP EVERGREEN CORPORATION INC: $5,000 · Other+9 more: $17,000 · Other+9 moreSHARON S RICHARDSON COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $40,000 · HealthSHARON S RICHARDSON CO…REINS INC: $11,000 · HealthREINS INCDogs to Dog Tags Inc: $35,000 · Public BenefitDogs to Dog Tag…NOURISH FARMS INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionNOURISH FARMS…
Other$145,000Health$51,000Public Benefit$35,000Food & Nutrition$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHARON S RICHARDSON COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $40,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDogs to Dog Tags Inc: $35,000 over 6y, 7.8% of budgetNOURISH FARMS INC: $30,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS WI SHORELINE INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL RESEARCH CENTERINC: $15,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetREINS INC: $11,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCAMP EVERGREEN CORPORATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHARON S RICHARDSON COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Dogs to Dog Tags Inc ↗
  • Who funds NOURISH FARMS INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS WI SHORELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL RESEARCH CENTERINC ↗
  • Who funds REINS INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP EVERGREEN CORPORATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Frank G & Frieda K Brotz Family Foundation IncWI17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Frank G & Frieda K Brotz Family Foundation Inc · Gentine Foundation Inc · Garton Family Foundation · Wm Collins Kohler Foundation Inc · Hayssen Family Foundation Inc · Fk Bemis Family Foundation Inc · Lakeshore Community Foundation Inc · Kohler Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph & Evelyn Richardson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph & Evelyn Richardson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Joseph & Evelyn Richardson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Joseph & Evelyn Richardson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joseph & Evelyn Richardson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph