Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fk Bemis Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$449k
Granted FY2025still arriving
53
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$54k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$794kYouth Development$602kHuman Services$475kFood & Nutrition$469kHealth$454kArts & Culture$451kPhilanthropy$275kAnimals$118kOther$0
02FY2025 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k38 grants · $110k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $185k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $154k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY$53,678
CAMP EVERGREEN - AQUATIC FACILITY$50,000
A MILLION DREAMZ INC$50,000
FRIENDS OF CAMP ANOKIJIG INC$30,000
ABOVE & BEYOND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$25,000
REINS INC - BLDG PURCHASE & PROGRAM EXPANSION$25,000
SHEBOYGAN COUNTY FOOD BANK$20,000
SHEBOYGAN COUNTY CYCLING$15,000
1907 CLUB INC$10,000
NOURISH FARMS INC$10,000
LAKELAND UNIVERSITY$10,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$10,000
LAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE (LCHC)$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY$10,000
ELEVATE INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $116k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FRIENDS OF CAMP ANOKIJIG INC: $30k → 9%FRIENDS OF CAMP ANOKIJIG: $12k → 9%FRIENDS OF CAMP ANOKIJIG: $5k → 9%FRIENDS OF CAMP ANOKIJIG: $3k → 9%FRIENDS OF CAMP ANOKIJIG: $3k → 9%FRIENDS OF CAMP ANOKIJIG: $3k → 9%A MILLION DREAMZ INC: $50k → 9%ELEVATE INC: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.6M · 68 repeat orgs$277k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

68 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 36 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

68
23

Total granted

$3.6M
$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+9%

Still filing today

41%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $185k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AM
    A MILLION DREAMZ INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $250k · revenue +268%
  • SC
    SHEBOYGAN COUNTY FOOD BANK INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +262%
  • LC
    LAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $152k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • SN
    ST NICHOLAS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • WR
    WI RECOVERY COMMUNITY ORGANZIATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • WR
    WI RECOVERY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sheboygan County Chamber of Commerce Inc

Promote sheboygan county business development.

2
Southern Lakes Credit Union

We will stirve to make a significant difference in improving the quality of life of our members and the communities we serve by providing affordable access to credit and financial services.

3
Westconsin Credit Union

The organization is a cooperative, nonprofit corporation, incorporated under wisconsin state law to encourage thrift among its members, create a source of credit at a fair and reasonable cost, and provide an opportunity for its members to…

4
Sheboygan Area Credit Union

Our mission is to provide efficient, progressive financial services and products to our owner-members in agreement with credit union philosophy

5
Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

6
The College of Wooster

The college of wooster is a community of independent minds, working together to prepare students to become leaders of character and influence in an interdependent global community. (continued on schedule o)we engage motivated students in a…

Education
7
Lake Country Academy Inc

The mission of lake country academy is to be a recognized leader in education through direct instruction and core knowledge within an environment that emphasizes core values.

Education
8
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

9
Big Brothers Big Sisters Wi Shoreline Inc

Big brothers big sisters creates and supports one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

10
Sheboygan Senior Community Inc

To provide and operate a retirement home, health care center, and related services in the greater sheboygan area for elderly and physically handicapped adults, which shall enhance, honor and preserve the dignity of the individual, and…

Health
11
Door County Land Trust Inc

The door county land trust is a local, non-governmental non-profit organization whose mission is to preserve door county's exceptional lands and waters forever.

Environment
12
Wisconsin Land and Water Conservation Association Inc

To protect, conserve, and enhance wisconsin's natural resources by advocating for and supporting county conservation efforts, for current and future generations.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sheboygan County Young Men's Christian Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Marquette University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySheboygan-Manitowoc Communi…Local Community Service Org…Education Scholarships & Su…Family FoundationsLocal Recreation & Conserva…Charter Schools and Educati…Performing Arts Organizatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%3%<5yr16%5%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr14%18%20–35yr11%21%35–55yr13%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%1%<5yr16%11%5–10yr20%27%10–20yr14%9%20–35yr11%16%35–55yr13%37%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/51
the rest of the field
13%
548/4,248

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/44
Grantees still filing
30/44
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SHEBOYGAN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT — $160,000 · OtherSHEBOYGAN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTHSHS - ST NICHOLAS FOUNDATION — $150,000 · OtherHSHS - ST NICHOLAS FOUNDATIONSHARON S RICHARDSON HOSPICE HOME — $115,000 · OtherSHARON S RICHARDSON HOSPICE HOMEABOVE & BEYOND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $105,000 · OtherABOVE & BEYOND CHILDREN'S MUSEUMSHEBOYGAN HUMANE SOCIETY — $97,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC — $92,500 · OtherCAMP EVERGREEN KIDDIES CAMP — $91,000 · OtherSTEFANIE H WEILL CENTER — $69,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC — $65,000 · Other+79 more — $961,215 · Other+79 moreNOURISH FARMS INC — $290,000 · Food & NutritionNOURISH FARMS…SHEBOYGAN COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $165,000 · Food & NutritionSHEBOYGAN COU…LAKELAND UNIVERSITY — $242,392 · EducationLAKELAND U…BOOKWORM GARDENS INC — $65,000 · EducationBOOKWORM G…FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC — $38,500 · EducationFAMILY RES…+7 more — $12,625 · EducationA MILLION DREAMZ INC — $250,000 · Human ServicesA MILLION …FRIENDS OF CAMP ANOKIJIG INC — $56,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF…Sheboygan County YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC — $35,000 · Human ServicesSheboygan …+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesJOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ARTS CENTER INC — $317,500 · Arts & CultureJOHN MICH…+2 more — $12,500 · Arts & CultureLAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC — $152,250 · HealthREINS INC — $112,500 · Health1907 Club — $10,000 · HealthUNITED WAY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC — $219,027 · Philanthropy
Other$1,906,215Food & Nutrition$455,000Education$358,517Human Services$351,000Arts & Culture$330,000Health$274,750Philanthropy$219,027

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ARTS CENTER INC — $317,500 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetNOURISH FARMS INC — $290,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetA MILLION DREAMZ INC — $250,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetLAKELAND UNIVERSITY — $242,392 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC — $219,027 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetSHEBOYGAN COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $165,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetLAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC — $152,250 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetREINS INC — $112,500 over 7y, 10% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC — $92,500 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetBOOKWORM GARDENS INC — $65,000 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC — $65,000 over 8y, 5.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF CAMP ANOKIJIG INC — $56,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetMANITOU COUNCIL INC D/B/A GIRL SCOUTS OF MANITOU COUNCIL — $40,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC — $38,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetSheboygan County YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC — $35,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY LAKESIDE INC — $30,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL RESEARCH CENTERINC — $27,000 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetGLACIAL LAKES CONSERVANCY INC — $22,500 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetDogs to Dog Tags Inc — $20,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE BROUGHTON — $18,500 over 3y, 14% of budgetBAY-LAKES COUNCIL #635 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC — $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF STEVENS POINT — $13,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budget1907 Club — $10,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetSHEBOYGAN THEATRE COMPANY — $9,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetICE AGE TRAIL ALLIANCE INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDARE TO DREAM THEATRE INC — $7,500 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetPARTNERS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHEBOYGAN FALLS CHAMBER MAIN STREET — $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTHEATER FOR YOUNG AUDIENCES — $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetBELLIN COLLEGE INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMACALESTER COLLEGE — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMarquette University — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORKBOUND INC — $2,500 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetRebuilding Together Sheboygan Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetCALDWELL COUNTY UNITED FUND INC — $2,376 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIAN UNIVERSITY INC — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHLAND COLLEGE — $625 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ARTS CENTER INC
  • Who funds NOURISH FARMS INC
  • Who funds A MILLION DREAMZ INC
  • Who funds LAKELAND UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC
  • Who funds SHEBOYGAN COUNTY FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds LAKESHORE COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE INC
  • Who funds REINS INC
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC
  • Who funds BOOKWORM GARDENS INC
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CAMP ANOKIJIG INC
  • Who funds MANITOU COUNCIL INC D/B/A GIRL SCOUTS OF MANITOU COUNCIL
  • Who funds FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC
  • Who funds Sheboygan County YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY LAKESIDE INC
  • Who funds SHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL RESEARCH CENTERINC
  • Who funds GLACIAL LAKES CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds Dogs to Dog Tags Inc
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE BROUGHTON

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Frank G & Frieda K Brotz Family Foundation IncWI59.8× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Frank G & Frieda K Brotz Family Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Kohler Foundation Inc · Hayssen Family Foundation Inc · Garton Family Foundation · Lakeshore Community Foundation Inc · Ruth St John & John Dunham West Foundation Inc · The Zieve Foundation · Catharine B Stayer Family Foundation Inc · Terry Kohler Family Foundation Inc · United Way of Sheboygan County Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fk Bemis Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fk Bemis Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Fk Bemis Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 111 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph