Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gentine Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$665k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$1.5MHealth$760kReligion$305kCrime & Legal$270kAnimals$220kArts & Culture$80kHuman Services$65kYouth Development$64kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $350k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEMENTIA INNOVATIONS$300,000
SETON CATHOLIC SCHOOLS$100,000
LAKESHORE REGIONAL CHILD ADVOCACY$100,000
HSHS ST NICHOLAS FOUNDATON$100,000
ABOVE AND BEYOND CHILDRENS MUSEUM$50,000
DUCKS UNLIMITED$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Lakeshore Regional Child Advocacy Center: $50k → 6%LAKESHORE REGIONAL CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $40k → 6%The Crossing of Manitowoc County: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 8 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
28

Total granted

$1.4M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-16%
-16%

Still filing today

38%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $450k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    Seton Catholic Schools
    4× · 2022–2025 · $450k
  • VO
    Valley of Our Lady Monastery
    2× · 2021–2022 · $250k
  • RC
    RONCALLI CATHOLIC SCHOOLS
    2× · 2022–2023 · $200k

Funded once

  • X
    x
    one grant, 2021 · $250k
  • OC
    Oostburg Christian School
    one grant, 2023 · $150k
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue -16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pathways of Wisconsin Inc

Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.

Human Services
2
Lakeshore Community Services Inc

The mission of lakeshore is to enhance the ability of persons with mental and physical disabilities to live as independently as possible through acquisition of skills and utilization of services that promote each individual's self…

Human Services
3
Progress Lakeshore Inc

To assist local businesses in their growth in the manitowoc county area and to attract new businesses to the manitowoc county area.

Community Improvement
4
Safe Harbor of Sheboygan County Inc

To empower those impacted by domestic and sexual violence through compassionate support and comprehensive services, while fostering a community rooted in safety, equity, and healthy relationships. we strive to prevent future violence…

Human Services
5
Sunshine House Inc

Sunshine resources of door county enriches lives to nurture and inspire the human spirit with care, compassion, partnership and integrity.

Human Services
6
Sheboygan County Food Bank Inc

Lead sheboygan county's efforts to increase the food security of its residents by distributing healthy emergency food and fostering innovative partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
7
Samaritan's Hand Inc

Hope for the hopeless & healing for the hurting. the hopelessness from addiction & healing from the hurt stemming from the addiction.

Public Benefit
8
Humane Society of the Lakes

To provide services for abandoned, stray or unwanted animals while they await life long homes. our vision is that all animals are cared for with dignity and respect.

Animals
9
Lifeways of Wisconsin Inc

Operation of childcare centers based on the waldorf teaching method. nurturing children, families, caregivers and communities. lifeways welcomes children and families of any race, religion,

Human Services
10
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
11
Autism Society of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Dedicated to improving the lives of all who are impacted by autism spectrum disorders by providing information, resources, and support, while raising awareness and acceptance in our community.

12
Family Connections Inc

To assist childcare providers and parents needing childcare.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters Wi Shoreline Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rightway Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
5/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Seton Catholic Schools — $450,000 · OtherSeton Catholic SchoolsValley of Our Lady Monastery — $250,000 · OtherValley of Our Lady Monasteryx — $250,000 · OtherxRONCALLI CATHOLIC SCHOOLS — $200,000 · OtherRONCALLI CATHOLIC SCHOOLSCAMP EVERGREEN CORPORATION INC — $200,000 · OtherCAMP EVERGREEN CORPORATION INCLAKESHORE REGIONAL CHILD ADVOCACY — $150,000 · OtherLAKESHORE REGIONAL CHILD ADVOCACYOostburg Christian School — $150,000 · OtherOostburg Christian SchoolRONCALLI CATHOLICS SCHOOLS — $100,000 · OtherSheboygan Lutheran High SChool — $100,000 · OtherHSHS ST NICHOLAS FOUNDATON — $100,000 · OtherOOSTBURG CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS — $100,000 · Other+17 more — $499,300 · Other+17 moreDEMENTIA INNOVATIONS INC — $300,000 · HealthDEMENTIA INN…RIGHTWAY CLUB INC — $50,000 · HealthRIGHTWAY CLU…REINS INC — $35,000 · HealthREINS INCHUMANE SOCIETY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC — $150,000 · AnimalsBOOKWORM GARDENS INC — $50,000 · EducationLAKESHORE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · EducationLAKESHORE REGIONAL CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $90,000 · Human ServicesTHE CROSSING OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyDogs to Dog Tags Inc — $50,000 · Public BenefitPLYMOUTH ADVANCEMENT ASSOCIATION LEE GENTINE — $15,000 · Community Improvement
Other$2,549,300Health$385,000Animals$150,000Education$100,000Human Services$95,000Philanthropy$50,000Public Benefit$50,000Community Improvement$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAMP EVERGREEN CORPORATION INC — $200,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC — $150,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetLAKESHORE REGIONAL CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $90,000 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetBOOKWORM GARDENS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetLAKESHORE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetRIGHTWAY CLUB INC — $50,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetDogs to Dog Tags Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetREINS INC — $35,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetPLYMOUTH ADVANCEMENT ASSOCIATION LEE GENTINE — $15,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS WI SHORELINE INC — $14,300 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE CROSSING OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL RESEARCH CENTERINC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DEMENTIA INNOVATIONS INC
  • Who funds CAMP EVERGREEN CORPORATION INC
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC
  • Who funds LAKESHORE REGIONAL CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC
  • Who funds BOOKWORM GARDENS INC
  • Who funds LAKESHORE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds RIGHTWAY CLUB INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INC
  • Who funds Dogs to Dog Tags Inc
  • Who funds REINS INC
  • Who funds PLYMOUTH ADVANCEMENT ASSOCIATION LEE GENTINE
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS WI SHORELINE INC
  • Who funds THE CROSSING OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC
  • Who funds SHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL RESEARCH CENTERINC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Frank G & Frieda K Brotz Family Foundation IncWI28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Frank G & Frieda K Brotz Family Foundation Inc · Lakeshore Community Foundation Inc · Ruth St John & John Dunham West Foundation Inc · The Sartori Family Foundation Inc · Melitta S and Joan M Pick Charitable Trust · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Joseph & Evelyn Richardson Foundation · Garton Family Foundation · Hayssen Family Foundation Inc · Fk Bemis Family Foundation Inc · Randall J & Judith F Hake Family Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gentine Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gentine Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Gentine Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph