Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jos & Catherine JOHNSON FAMILY FDN

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$311k
Granted FY2025still arriving
63
Grants FY2025still arriving
23
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$674kEnvironment$214kHealth$166kAnimals$134kHuman Services$76kFood & Nutrition$71kEducation$55kInternational$39kOther$0
02FY2025 · 63 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k59 grants · $181k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$3,000
Median grant
23
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Diocese of Ikot Ekpene$80,000
St Peter Catholic Church$30,000
Sacred Heart South Missions Housing$10,000
Water 1st International$10,000
The Elephant Sanctuary$8,000
National Parks Conservation Assoc$8,000
Savory Institute$5,000
Kiss the Ground$5,000
Luekemia Lymphoma Society$5,000
The Rodale Institute$5,000
Trees for the Future$5,000
Crane Trust$5,000
Blood Cancer United$5,000
Pollinator Partnership$5,000
Northern Illinois Food Bank$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $111k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Boystown: $3k → 12%ANGEL FLIGHT: $5k → 15%Casting Carolinas: $2k → 12%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION: $4k → 8%Christian Appalachian Project: $5k → 26%Boystown: $2k → 12%Casting Carolinas: $2k → 12%RIVERBENDERCOM COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 12%Warrior Canine Connection: $3k → 8%Christian Appalachian Project: $5k → 26%DIOCESE OF IKOT EKPENE OFFICE FOR THE MISSIONS USA: $20k → 8%RIVERBENDERCOM COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 12%Warrior Canine Connection: $3k → 8%Christian Appalachian Project: $3k → 26%Charity Water: $5k → 17%Warrior Canine Connection: $3k → 8%CHRISTIAN APPLACHIAN PROJECT: $2k → 26%CHARITY WATER: $5k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $5k → 17%CRISIS FOOD CENTER: $2k → 12%CHARITY WATER: $3k → 17%Crisis Food Center: $2k → 12%Charity Water: $3k → 17%RIVERBENDERCOM COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 12%Charity Water: $2k → 17%Charity Water: $2k → 17%CRISIS FOOD CENTER: $2k → 12%Crisis Food Center: $2k → 12%CRISIS FOOD CENTER: $2k → 12%COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IN
PA
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 74 repeat orgs$193k to everyone else

74 repeat relationships: 45 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

74
27

Total granted

$1.3M
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+58%

Still filing today

65%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +57%
  • WILD SALMON CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +371%
  • CHARITY GLOBAL INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $24k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • DO
    DIOCESE OF IKOT EKPENE OFFICE FOR THE MISSIONS USAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +58%
  • MS
    MADELEINE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • AB
    ALTON BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
2
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
3
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
4
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
5
Wildlife Alliance Inc

Wildlife alliance is the leader in direct protection of forests and wildlife in tropical asia. our mission is to combat deforestation, biodiversity loss, climate change, and poverty by partnering with local communities and governments.…

Animals
6
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
7
Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

Environment
8
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
9
African Wildlife Foundation Inc

Awf's mission is to ensure wildlife and wild lands thrive in modern africa. we work to equip african governments, institutions, business, and communities with the tools, insights, and support they need to define, own, and realize a…

Animals
10
Endangered Species International

Endangered Species International is strongly committed to reversing the trend of human-induced species extinction, saving endangered animals, and preserving wild places.

Animals
11
Wild Landscapes Inc

Wild landscapes, inc. (wli) is dedicated to conserving large and connected landscapes globally significant to wildlife and crucial to local communities. our environmental conservation strategy is to empower communities, conservationists,…

Animals
12
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wild Salmon Center; the most unlike its peers is Diocese of Ikot Ekpene Office for the Missions Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
75/75
Grantees still filing
40/75
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DIOCESE OF IKOT EKPENE: $470,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF IKOT EKPENESt Peter Catholic Church: $102,000 · OtherSt Peter Catholic ChurchLEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY (OSWIM CHAPTER): $64,500 · OtherLEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY (OSWIM CHAPTER)+65 more: $469,787 · Other+65 moreINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $29,000 · AnimalsWILD SALMON CENTER: $27,999 · AnimalsNative Fish Society Inc: $18,000 · AnimalsTREEHOUSE WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $17,000 · AnimalsTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $10,000 · AnimalsTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $7,800 · AnimalsWILD CANID SURVIVAL AND RESEARCH CENTER INC DBA ENDANGERED WOLF CENTER: $5,500 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $4,000 · Animals+1 more: $500 · AnimalsCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $24,000 · Human ServicesDIOCESE OF IKOT EKPENE OFFICE FOR THE MISSIONS USA: $20,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesWARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC: $12,999 · Human ServicesCRISIS FOOD CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesRIVERBENDERCOM COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesOregon Community Warehouse Inc: $7,000 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $5,000 · Human ServicesANGEL FLIGHT INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCasting Carolinas Inc: $4,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $22,000 · EnvironmentHEALTHY GULF: $10,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $9,000 · EnvironmentSustainable Harvest International: $8,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $8,000 · EnvironmentFIVE VALLEYS LAND TRUST: $7,000 · EnvironmentSAVORY INSTITUTEORG INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentPollinator Partnership: $5,000 · EnvironmentTREES FOR THE FUTURE INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentOCEANA INC: $4,000 · EnvironmentALDO LEOPOLD NATURE CENTER INC: $4,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $4,000 · Environment+7 more: $17,500 · EnvironmentWATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL: $27,500 · PhilanthropyST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyST LOUIS CARDINALS COMMUNITY FUND: $2,000 · PhilanthropyBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $15,000 · HealthST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $8,000 · HealthCASTING FOR RECOVERY: $5,000 · HealthWARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · HealthCulver Educational Foundation: $14,000 · EducationPROJECT DRAWDOWN: $10,000 · EducationALTON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationA RED CIRCLE: $1,500 · Education
Other$1,106,287Animals$119,799Human Services$111,499Environment$108,500Philanthropy$35,500Health$32,000Education$30,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $29,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWILD SALMON CENTER: $27,999 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL: $27,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $24,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $22,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDIOCESE OF IKOT EKPENE OFFICE FOR THE MISSIONS USA: $20,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetORGANIC SEED ALLIANCE: $19,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetNative Fish Society Inc: $18,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTREEHOUSE WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $17,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $17,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMADONNA RENEWAL CENTER: $14,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetCulver Educational Foundation: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC: $12,999 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMax McGraw Wildlife Foundation: $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRISIS FOOD CENTER INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetHEALTHY GULF: $10,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT DRAWDOWN: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERBENDERCOM COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $8,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSustainable Harvest International: $8,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $7,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLY FISHERS INTERNATIONAL: $7,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFIVE VALLEYS LAND TRUST: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOregon Community Warehouse Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOne-Eighty Place: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILD CANID SURVIVAL AND RESEARCH CENTER INC DBA ENDANGERED WOLF CENTER: $5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL GAME FISH ASSOCIATION INC: $5,160 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRodale Institute: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASTING FOR RECOVERY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKISS THE GROUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetWILD OCEANS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGIRLS ON THE FLY: $4,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetOCEANA INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALDO LEOPOLD NATURE CENTER INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WILD SALMON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE FOREVER ↗
  • Who funds DIOCESE OF IKOT EKPENE OFFICE FOR THE MISSIONS USA ↗
  • Who funds ORGANIC SEED ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Native Fish Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds TREEHOUSE WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MADONNA RENEWAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Culver Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS FOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY GULF ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT DRAWDOWN ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PatagoniaorgCA15.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Patagoniaorg · Meyer Memorial Trust · Clif Family Foundation · Kohnstamm Family Foundation · Rose E Tucker Charitable Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · The Collins Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Pledgeling Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Nature Conservancy

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jos & Catherine JOHNSON FAMILY FDN funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jos & Catherine JOHNSON FAMILY FDN. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Wild Salmon Center: 49% of income from government
  • Native Fish Society Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Oregon Community Warehouse Inc: 24% of income from government
  • The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Ecotrust: 14% of income from government
  • Warrior Canine Connection Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Solve: 5% of income from government
  • International Game Fish Association Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Bird Alliance of Oregon Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jos & Catherine JOHNSON FAMILY FDN?

Find your warmest path to Jos & Catherine JOHNSON FAMILY FDN through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jos & Catherine JOHNSON FAMILY FDN’s filings →

More from the funding graph