Skip to content

· Public charity

Join

JOIN supports the efforts of homeless individuals and families to transition out of homelessness into permanent housing and supports housing stabilization by providing critical supportive services after transition from homelessness.

$2.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$191k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$4.1M
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $483,875, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,636,818 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,152,943 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $159k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $325k
$48,456
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SE UPLIFT$191,298
COALITION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS$80,160
NATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHWEST$53,892
MENTAL HEALTH & ADDICTION ASSOCIATION OF OREGON$48,456
NORTH WILLIAMS HOUSING ASSOCIATES$44,630
EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO$35,768
CENTRAL CITY CONCERN$29,671
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%URBAN LEAGUE: $226k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE: $171k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE: $123k → 12%EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATLICO: $262k → 12%EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATLICO: $237k → 12%EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $177k → 12%EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $36k → 12%YWCA OF GREATER PORTLAND: $127k → 12%YWCA OF GREATER PORTLAND: $116k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 10 repeat orgs$226k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$3.8M
$181k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+40%

Still filing today

90%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SU
    SOUTHEAST UPLIFT NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRAM INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $857k · revenue +4% · 47% of their budget
  • EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO
    4× · 2022–2025 · $711k · revenue +92%
  • NA
    NATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHWEST INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $554k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • NH
    NORTHWEST HEALTH FOUNDATION FUND II
    one grant, 2022 · $125k · revenue -77%
  • CASCADIA HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $56k · revenue +40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cascade Aids Project

We promote well-being and advance equity by providing inclusive health and wellness services for lgbtq+ people, people affected by hiv, and all those seeking compassionate care.

Health
2
Northwest Housing Alternatives

Northwest housing alternatives (nha)s mission is to create opportunity through housing. nha develops, builds, and manages affordable rental housing for families, seniors, and people with disabilities across oregon. these homes help…

Housing & Shelter
3
Cultivate Initiatives

The organization collectively works alongside those on the margins to empower individuals and communities through an inclusive range of services and support in east portland.

Housing & Shelter
4
Welcome Home Coalition

Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…

Community Improvement
5
Chicago House & Social Service Agency

Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids

Health
6
Healthright 360

To give hope and change lives. we do this by offering a continuum of prevention, intervention, behavioral health and wellness services to adults and families throughout california. these services aim to reduce costs of societal problems by…

—
7
Eastern Oregon Health and Wellness Inc

Eastern oregon health & wellness provides recovery housing and outpatient services that support individuals and families impacted by substance use disorder through safe housing, trauma-informed care, and community-based support.

Health
8
Jamhi Health & Wellness Inc

We provide a comprehensive, co occurring disorder-capable, community behavioral health center. we provide quality care using best practices designed to promote health, wellness, self-determination, and recovery. the service area is the…

Health
9
Cornerstone Montgomery

Empowering people living with mental health and substance use disorders to thrive in their community through collaboration, treatment, education and advocacy.

—
10
Bonita House Inc

To empower people living with mental health and co-occurring substance use challenges to achieve recovery, self-sufficiency, and deeply connected, meaningful lives within their communities.we do this by: delivering culturally responsive…

—
11
Congregations for the Homeless

Providing shelter, housing, food, and case management services to men experiencing homelessness on the east side of king county, wa.

Housing & Shelter
12
Canvas Health Inc

To be a recognized leader in community mental health, respected for our clinical quality, innovation, and adaptation to a rapidly changing health care and social services environment.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coalition of Community Health Clinics; the most unlike its peers is The Bridge Housing Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $711,001 · Human ServicesEL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICOURBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INC: $520,299 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INCYWCA OF GREATER PORTLAND: $242,704 · Human ServicesYWCA OF GREATER PORTLANDNATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHWEST INC: $554,255 · HealthNATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION ASS…Coalition of Community Health Clinics: $322,657 · HealthCoalition of Community Health Clin…Central City Concern: $176,803 · HealthCentral City ConcernNORTHWEST HEALTH FOUNDATION FUND II: $125,000 · HealthNORTHWEST HEALTH FOUNDATION FUND I…CASCADIA HEALTH: $56,118 · HealthSOUTHEAST UPLIFT NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRAM INC: $857,348 · Crime & LegalSOUTHEAST UPLIFT NEIGHB…Mental Health Association of Oregon: $262,456 · OtherMental Heal…CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $107,102 · OtherCATHOLIC CH…NORTH WILLIAMS HOUSING ASSOCIATES: $44,630 · OtherNORTH WILLI…THE BRIDGE HOUSING CORPORATION: $80,000 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$1,474,004Health$1,234,833Crime & Legal$857,348Other$414,188Housing & Shelter$80,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHEAST UPLIFT NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRAM INC: $857,348 over 4y, 47% of budgetEL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $711,001 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHWEST INC: $554,255 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INC: $520,299 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCoalition of Community Health Clinics: $322,657 over 4y, 17% of budgetMental Health Association of Oregon: $262,456 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetYWCA OF GREATER PORTLAND: $242,704 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCentral City Concern: $176,803 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST HEALTH FOUNDATION FUND II: $125,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE BRIDGE HOUSING CORPORATION: $80,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetCASCADIA HEALTH: $56,118 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR22.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · Careoregon Inc · Seeding Justice · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Join funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Join. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 33%
  • The Bridge Housing Corporation: 100% of income from government
  • Northwest Health Foundation Fund Ii: 81% of income from government
  • Coalition of Community Health Clinics: 46% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association of Oregon: 41% of income from government
  • Urban League of Portland Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Native American Rehabilitation Association of the Northwest Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Ywca of Greater Portland: 15% of income from government
  • El Programa Hispano Catolico: 13% of income from government
  • Central City Concern: 10% of income from government
  • Cascadia Health: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Join’s filings →

More from the funding graph