· Public charity
Join
JOIN supports the efforts of homeless individuals and families to transition out of homelessness into permanent housing and supports housing stabilization by providing critical supportive services after transition from homelessness.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $483,875 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,636,818 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,152,943 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $159k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $325k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SE UPLIFT | $191,298 |
| COALITION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS | $80,160 |
| NATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHWEST | $53,892 |
| MENTAL HEALTH & ADDICTION ASSOCIATION OF OREGON | $48,456 |
| NORTH WILLIAMS HOUSING ASSOCIATES | $44,630 |
| EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO | $35,768 |
| CENTRAL CITY CONCERN | $29,671 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SUSOUTHEAST UPLIFT NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRAM INC4× · 2022–2025 · $857k · revenue +4% · 47% of their budget
EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO4× · 2022–2025 · $711k · revenue +92%- NANATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHWEST INC4× · 2022–2025 · $554k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- NHNORTHWEST HEALTH FOUNDATION FUND IIone grant, 2022 · $125k · revenue -77%
CASCADIA HEALTHgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $56k · revenue +40%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…
Eastern oregon health & wellness provides recovery housing and outpatient services that support individuals and families impacted by substance use disorder through safe housing, trauma-informed care, and community-based support.
Northwest housing alternatives (nha)s mission is to create opportunity through housing. nha develops, builds, and manages affordable rental housing for families, seniors, and people with disabilities across oregon. these homes help…
We promote well-being and advance equity by providing inclusive health and wellness services for lgbtq+ people, people affected by hiv, and all those seeking compassionate care.
Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids
The organization collectively works alongside those on the margins to empower individuals and communities through an inclusive range of services and support in east portland.
To give hope and change lives. we do this by offering a continuum of prevention, intervention, behavioral health and wellness services to adults and families throughout california. these services aim to reduce costs of societal problems by…
Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.
We provide a comprehensive, co occurring disorder-capable, community behavioral health center. we provide quality care using best practices designed to promote health, wellness, self-determination, and recovery. the service area is the…
Csnw's mission is to provide high quality, integrated mental health, addictions and housing services, focusing on individual strengths and recovery. our vision is a healthy community. we lead the way by assuring access to mental health,…
To empower people living with mental health and co-occurring substance use challenges to achieve recovery, self-sufficiency, and deeply connected, meaningful lives within their communities.we do this by: delivering culturally responsive…
Providing shelter, housing, food, and case management services to men experiencing homelessness on the east side of king county, wa.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coalition of Community Health Clinics and the most unlike its peers is The Bridge Housing Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOUTHEAST UPLIFT NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN REHABILITATION ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTHWEST INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INC ↗
- Who funds Coalition of Community Health Clinics ↗
- Who funds Mental Health Association of Oregon ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF GREATER PORTLAND ↗
- Who funds Central City Concern ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HEALTH FOUNDATION FUND II ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CASCADIA HEALTH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · Careoregon Inc · Seeding Justice · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Join funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Bridge Housing Corporation — 100% of income from government
- Northwest Health Foundation Fund Ii — 81% of income from government
- Coalition of Community Health Clinics — 46% of income from government
- Mental Health Association of Oregon — 41% of income from government
- Urban League of Portland Inc — 33% of income from government
- Native American Rehabilitation Association of the Northwest Inc — 16% of income from government
- Ywca of Greater Portland — 15% of income from government
- El Programa Hispano Catolico — 13% of income from government
- Central City Concern — 10% of income from government
- Cascadia Health — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.