Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Joia Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.1M
Granted FY2023
15
Grants FY2023
7
States reached
$3.5M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Joia Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Joia Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $4M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
21
11
22
13
23
0
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Philanthropy$33MInternational$5.5MHealth$600kEducation$400kHuman Services$340kCrime & Legal$70kReligion$50kCivil Rights$50kOther$0
02FY2023 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $450k
  • $250k+1 grant · $3.5M
$20,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$19k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$3,500,000
BROWN UNIVERSITY$100,000
SAVING TEENS IN CRISIS COLLABORATIVE INC$100,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION (DBA BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL)$100,000
SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND$100,000
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC$50,000
GLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS INC (DBA GLAD)$20,000
FAMILY PROMISE METROWEST INC$20,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC$20,000
NATICK SERVICE COUNCIL INC$20,000
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND INC$15,000
THE BAIL PROJECT INC$10,000
OUT METROWEST INC$10,000
LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC$10,000
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $550k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%SAVING TEENS IN CRISIS COLLABORATIVE INC: $100k → 14%SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND: $100k → 8%SAVING TEENS IN CRISIS COLLABORATIVE INC: $100k → 14%SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND: $100k → 8%SAVING TEENS IN CRISIS COLLABORATIVE INC: $100k → 14%SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND: $50k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.6M · 12 repeat orgs$210k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$6.6M
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+17%

Still filing today

92%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
Civil RightsHealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    3× · 2021–2023 · $300k · revenue +41%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE METROWEST INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $40k · revenue +44%
  • NS
    NATICK SERVICE COUNCIL INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $40k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • Trustees of Tufts College
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +17%
  • FC
    FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
12
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naacp Legal Defense & Educ Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $32,534,595 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND+2 more — $340,000 · Community ImprovementPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $5,500,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEAL…Children's Hospital Corporation — $300,000 · Health+1 more — $50,000 · HealthSAVINGTEENS IN CRISIS COLLABORATIVE INC — $300,000 · Human ServicesSKY'S THE LIMIT FUND — $250,000 · Human ServicesTrustees of Tufts College — $100,000 · EducationFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH — $50,000 · OtherGLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS INC (DBA GLAD) — $40,000 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE METROWEST INC — $40,000 · OtherTHE BAIL PROJECT INC — $20,000 · OtherNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $30,000 · Civil RightsLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC — $20,000 · Civil RightsOUT METROWEST INC — $20,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $10,000 · Civil RightsWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $40,000 · International
Community Improvement$32,874,595Health$5,850,000Human Services$550,000Education$100,000Other$150,000Civil Rights$80,000International$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $32,534,595 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $5,500,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAVINGTEENS IN CRISIS COLLABORATIVE INC — $300,000 over 3y, 38% of budgetSKY'S THE LIMIT FUND — $250,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE METROWEST INC — $40,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetNATICK SERVICE COUNCIL INC — $40,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOUT METROWEST INC — $20,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA11.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Joia Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 9%
  • Trustees of Tufts College13% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • Out Metrowest Inc9% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph