Skip to content
Johns Hopkins All Children's Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Johns Hopkins All Children's Foundation Inc

Johns hopkins all children's foundation, inc.

$16M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$9.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$80MEducation$295kRecreation & Sports$58kPhilanthropy$50k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $15,455,807, the rows itemized in this filing. The $15,799,701 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $343,894 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $232k
  • $250k+3 grants · $15M
$123,931
Median grant
1
States reached
$183M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$9,488,454
ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC$3,793,414
PEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES$1,896,804
WEST COAST NEONATOLOGY$123,931
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA$108,316
COPPERHEAD CHARITIES$25,000
ALL CHILDRENS HEALTH SYSTEM$12,388
DYSAUTONOMIA PROJECT INC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $130k → 13%LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $15k → 8%SWIM ACROSS AMERICA: $13k → 10%KIDS HOME CARE INC: $23k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $108k → 13%SWIM ACROSS AMERICA: $13k → 10%COPPERHEAD CHARITIES: $25k → 12%USF FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 13%SWIM ACROSS AMERICA: $13k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $19k → 13%SWIM ACROSS AMERICA: $13k → 10%COPPERHEAD CHARITIES: $25k → 12%CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER: $15k → 13%JOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $9.5M → 12%ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $8.1M → 12%ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $6.0M → 12%ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $4.9M → 12%ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $4.8M → 12%ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $3.8M → 12%ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $3.7M → 12%ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $3.5M → 12%ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $3.4M → 12%JOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S HOPSITAL INC: $3.2M → 12%JOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S HOPSITAL INC: $3.1M → 12%JOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S HOPSITAL INC: $2.7M → 12%PEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC: $2.6M → 12%JOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC: $2.3M → 12%ALL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $2.3M → 12%PEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES: $1.9M → 12%PEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC: $1.9M → 12%JOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1.7M → 12%PEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC: $1.6M → 12%JOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC: $1.6M → 12%PEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC: $1.5M → 12%ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $1.4M → 12%PEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES: $1.2M → 12%ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $1.1M → 12%PEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES: $1.0M → 12%PEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC: $645k → 12%WEST COAST NEONATOLOGY: $264k → 12%WEST COAST NEONATOLOGY: $219k → 12%WEST COAST NEONATOLOGY: $124k → 12%JOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC: $109k → 12%WEST COAST NEONATOLOGY: $50k → 12%WEST COAST NEONATOLOGY INC: $43k → 12%WEST COAST NEONATOLOGY INC: $40k → 12%WEST COAST NEONATOLOGY INC: $35k → 12%ALL CHILDRENS HEALTH SYSTEM: $12k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$81M · 8 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$81M
$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+2%

Still filing today

88%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $41M · revenue +128% · 81% of their budget
  • JH
    JOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27M · revenue +102%
  • PP
    PEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $12M · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • University of South Florida Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +58%
  • KH
    KIDS HOME CARE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $23k · revenue -88%
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Johns Hopkins All Children's Foundation Inc

Johns hopkins all children's foundation, inc. supports the mission of johns hopkins all children's hospital, inc., all children's health system, inc., all children's research institute, inc. and other 501(c)(3) organizations through…

Health
2
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
3
Dana-Farber Children's Hospital Cancer Care Inc

To oversee, coordinate and support the Pediatric Oncology Programs at Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc.

Health
4
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
5
Johns Hopkins Medical Services Corporation

Johns hopkins medical services corporation provides healthcare services to the population of the us family health plan (usfhp).

Health
6
Children's Medical Center Corporation

To operate exclusively for the benefit of The Children's Hospital Corporation and its affiliated organizations in the conduct of their charitable, educational and scientific functions.

Health
7
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
8
Texas Children's

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education, and research.

Health
9
Children's Health Foundation

Children's health foundation (chf) supports children's health system (chs) and children's hospital of the king's daughters (chkd). chf is organized and operated to carry out the charitable, educational and scientific purposes of chs and…

Health
10
The Association of Chrmc and University Physicians

Children's university medical group (cumg) is the non-profit pediatric group practice established to support the academic, research and clinical missions of its corporate members, university of washington school of medicine (uwsom) and…

Health
11
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
12
Children's Specialty Group Inc

The mission of children's specialty group, inc. ("csg") is to provide the highest quality specialty health care services to infants, children and adolescents and to advance the effectiveness of health care through education and the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is All Children's Health System Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $40,633,008 · HealthALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INCJOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC: $26,514,242 · HealthJOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC+6 more: $94,588 · HealthPEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC: $12,337,516 · OtherPEDIATRIC PHYSICIA…WEST COAST NEONATOLOGY INC: $774,605 · OtherWEST COAST NEONATO…+2 more: $265,216 · OtherSwim Across America Inc: $50,000 · PhilanthropyCOPPERHEAD CHARITIES INC: $49,500 · PhilanthropyUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $25,000 · Education
Health$67,241,838Other$13,377,337Philanthropy$99,500Education$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALL CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $40,633,008 over 9y, 81% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC: $26,514,242 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetPEDIATRIC PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC: $12,337,516 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetWEST COAST NEONATOLOGY INC: $774,605 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetSwim Across America Inc: $50,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOPPERHEAD CHARITIES INC: $49,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL CHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $24,242 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetKIDS HOME CARE INC: $22,846 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetREAL HOPE FOR CDH: $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetDYSAUTONOMIA PROJECT INC: $7,500 over 1y, 3.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Johns Hopkins All Chi…Community Foundation …Network for GoodFidelity Investments …
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital IncMD15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Johns Hopkins All Children's Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Johns Hopkins All Children's Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Johns Hopkins All Children's’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home