· Private foundation
John y & Reiko E Sato Foundation Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k22 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OVERLAKE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| MARY BRIDGE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $14,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON | $11,000 |
| MULTICARE HEALTH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON | $5,000 |
| EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER | $5,000 |
| KEIRO NORTHWEST | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| DENSHO | $1,500 |
| YOUTHCARE | $1,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $1,000 |
| UNION GOSPEL MISSION | $1,000 |
| PROVIDENCE MOUNT ST VINCENT FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| CHICAGO YOUTH PROGRAMS | $1,000 |
| TREEHOUSE | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MFMULTICARE FOUNDATIONS8× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +163%
- OHOVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION6× · 2019–2024 · $45k · revenue +27%
- DDENSHO8× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- EAEISENHOWER ARMY MEDICAL CENTERone grant, 2017 · $3k
- LRLIBERTY ROBOTICS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $2k
Mercy Ships Internationalgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +115%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.
We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.
Partnering for healing and a healthy future through philanthropy.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Overlake Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MULTICARE FOUNDATIONS ↗
- Who funds OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENSHO ↗
- Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
- Who funds KEIRO NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE MOUNT ST VINCENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
- Who funds THE RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds CENTRALIA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTHCARE ↗
- Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
- Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF YOUTH ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Swim Across America Inc ↗
- Who funds Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Apex Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization John y & Reiko E Sato Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.