Skip to content

· Private foundation

John T Stevens Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$533k
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$71k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$736kHuman Services$653kRecreation & Sports$525kEducation$514kHealth$277kArts & Culture$215kFood & Nutrition$202kYouth Development$150kOther$0
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $100k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $362k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $71k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOWN OF KERSHAW$71,000
MT CALVARY OUTREACH CENTER$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$30,000
LANCASTER CHILDREN'S HOME INC$30,000
CROSS ROAD BAPTIST CHURCH$23,000
NEW HORIZON COMMUNITY CHURCH$20,000
OPERATION RUDOLPH$20,000
KERSHAW AREA RESOURCE EXCHANGE$15,000
FOOD FOR THE SOUL$15,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF KERSHAW COUNTY$15,000
LANCASTER SPCA$15,000
COMMUNITY MEDICAL CLINIC OF KERSHAW COUNTY$15,000
NORTH CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL$14,000
CAMDEN HIGH SCHOOL$13,500
LANCASTER COUNTY COUNCIL OF THE ARTS$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $575k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $8k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $8k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%MT CALVARY OUTREACH CENTER: $33k → 11%MT CALVARY OUTREACH CENTER: $30k → 11%KERSHAW AREA RESOURCE EXCHANGE: $27k → 11%OPERATION RUDOLPH: $20k → 11%MT CALVARY OUTREACH CENTER: $20k → 11%KARE: $18k → 11%KERSHAW AREA RESOURCE EXCHANGE: $15k → 11%MT CALVARY OUTREACH CENTER: $15k → 11%KERSHAW AREA RESOURCE EXCHANGE: $15k → 11%MT CALVARY OUTREACH CENTER: $15k → 11%MT CALVARY OUTREACH CENTER: $15k → 11%OPERATION RUDOLPH: $15k → 11%OPERATION RUDOLPH: $15k → 11%KARE: $15k → 11%KERSHAW AREA RESOURCE EXCHANGE: $15k → 11%OPERATION RUDOLPH: $15k → 11%KERSHAW AREA RESOURCE EXCHANGE: $13k → 11%OPERATION RUDOLPH: $12k → 11%OPERATION RUDOLPH: $12k → 11%OPERATION RUDOLPH: $12k → 11%KERSHAW AREA RESOURCE EXCHANGE: $12k → 11%OPERATION RUDOLPH: $10k → 11%MT CALVARY OUTREACH CENTER: $10k → 11%MT CALVARY OUTREACH CENTER: $10k → 11%MT CALVARY OUTREACH CENTER: $10k → 11%OPERATION RUDOLPH: $10k → 11%LANCASTER COUNTY COUNCIL OF AGING: $10k → 11%LANCASTER COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $8k → 11%LANCASTER COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $8k → 11%LANCASTER COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $8k → 11%LANCASTER COUNTY COUNCIL OF AGING: $8k → 11%LANCASTER COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $8k → 11%CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $7k → 11%CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $7k → 11%CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $7k → 11%CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $6k → 11%CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $4k → 11%CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $3k → 11%CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $3k → 11%CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 78 repeat orgs$466k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

78 repeat relationships: 42 still active in FY2025, 36 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

78
55

Total granted

$3.4M
$422k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+29%

Still filing today

29%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MT CALVARY OUTREACH CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $158k · revenue +18% · 31% of their budget
  • LC
    LANCASTER CHILDRENS HOME
    8× · 2018–2025 · $136k · revenue +138%
  • KA
    KERSHAW AREA RESOURCE EXCHANGE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $129k · revenue +403%

Funded once

  • SB
    SECOND BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $35k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • MU
    MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lancaster Community Safety Coalition

Enhance public safety and the quality of life in lancaster by engaging the community and advancing current crime prevention strategies.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Care-Net of Lancaster

The best healthcare, for the lowest cost, for the most people.

—
3
Lancaster Public Library

The lancaster public library inspires, empowers, and strengthens our community by connecting people with information, ideas, and enriching experiences.

Education
4
Lancaster County Chamber of Commerce Inc

Support member businesses through education and promotion, and support the quality of life in lancaster county through promoting compatible economic development.

Community Improvement
5
Lancaster Community Center

The mission of Lancaster Community Center is to work for local non-profits, organizations, and churches to provide a facility for fundraising, community service, and education.

Human Services
6
Children's Museum of Lancaster

The children's museum of lancaster (hands-on-house) has the following mission: creating landmark learning experiences for children and their families through play.

Arts & Culture
7
Library System of Lancaster County

Provide resources, services, and expertise in a collaborative manner to and with the member libraries in order to effectively serve our communities

—
8
Lancaster Science Center

To inspire curiosity, creativity, and confidence by fostering an inclusive environment for hands-on stem exploration. we actively seek to make our facility and educational programs accessible to all.

Arts & Culture
9
Lancaster County Chamber of Commerce

Promote business in lancaster county, south carolina

Community Improvement
10
Chambersburg Area Council for the Arts

Support the arts locally through local cultural experiences

Arts & Culture
11
Boys & Girls Club of Lancaster Inc

To empower all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as caring, responsible, productive citizens.

—
12
The Community Library Inc

The lancaster community library is a center for the cultural, intellectual, and recreational pursuits of the community. through its materials, programs, and services, the library promotes literacy, provides lifetime learning opportunities,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Kershaw County; the most unlike its peers is The Lancaster County Partners for Youth. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 137 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
23/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TOWN OF KERSHAW: $391,027 · OtherTOWN OF KERSHAWFOOD FOR THE SOUL: $226,000 · OtherFOOD FOR THE SOULABNEY BAPTIST CHURCH: $150,500 · OtherLANCASTER CHILDRENS HOME: $136,000 · Other+114 more: $1,979,977 · Other+114 moreMT CALVARY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $158,000 · Human ServicesMT CALVARY OUTRE…KERSHAW AREA RESOURCE EXCHANGE: $129,000 · Human ServicesKERSHAW AREA RES…OPERATION RUDOLPH INC: $121,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION RUDOLP…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $75,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nationa…LANCASTER COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $52,000 · Human ServicesLANCASTER COUNTY…Christian Services Inc: $39,500 · Human ServicesChristian Servic…ARTS CENTER OF KERSHAW COUNTY INC: $74,771 · Arts & CultureLANCASTER COUNTY COUNCIL OF THE ARTS: $67,460 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL STEEPLECHASE MUSEUM INC: $14,500 · Arts & CultureKERSHAW AREA MUSIC SUPPORTERS: $12,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureKERSHAW COMMUNITY PARK COUNCIL INC: $56,000 · Recreation & SportsLANCASTER DIXIE BASEBALL INC: $35,000 · Recreation & SportsLANCASTER SPCA: $67,500 · AnimalsUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation: $40,000 · EducationEducational Foundation of USCL Inc: $20,000 · EducationCAMDEN PRIMARY PARTNERS INC: $3,300 · EducationPALMETTO COUNCIL INC SCOUTING AMERICA: $31,500 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Girls Club of Kershaw County: $30,000 · Youth Development
Other$2,883,504Human Services$574,500Arts & Culture$169,231Recreation & Sports$91,000Animals$67,500Education$63,300Youth Development$61,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMT CALVARY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $158,000 over 9y, 31% of budgetLANCASTER CHILDRENS HOME: $136,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetKERSHAW AREA RESOURCE EXCHANGE: $129,000 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetOPERATION RUDOLPH INC: $121,000 over 9y, 100% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $75,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetARTS CENTER OF KERSHAW COUNTY INC: $74,771 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetLANCASTER SPCA: $67,500 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTY COUNCIL OF THE ARTS: $67,460 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetKERSHAW COMMUNITY PARK COUNCIL INC: $56,000 over 7y, 43% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $52,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetSISTERCARE INC: $44,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Services Inc: $39,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetLANCASTER DIXIE BASEBALL INC: $35,000 over 7y, 10% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KERSHAW COUNTY: $32,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetPALMETTO COUNCIL INC SCOUTING AMERICA: $31,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Kershaw County: $30,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetEducational Foundation of USCL Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LANCASTER COUNTY INC: $17,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL STEEPLECHASE MUSEUM INC: $14,500 over 2y, 15% of budgetDOBY'S MILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTA: $14,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetKERSHAW AREA MUSIC SUPPORTERS: $12,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetHISTORIC CAMDEN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLancaster County Community Center: $6,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetCOLUMBUS PARKER TRACK CLUB: $5,500 over 4y, 12% of budgetCAMDEN PRIMARY PARTNERS INC: $3,300 over 1y, 13% of budgetThe Childrens Council: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Lancaster County Partners for Youth: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CAMDEN ARCHIVES & MUSEUM: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MT CALVARY OUTREACH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER CHILDRENS HOME ↗
  • Who funds KERSHAW AREA RESOURCE EXCHANGE ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION RUDOLPH INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds ARTS CENTER OF KERSHAW COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER SPCA ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY COUNCIL OF THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds KERSHAW COMMUNITY PARK COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds SISTERCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds University of South Carolina Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Christian Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER DIXIE BASEBALL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF KERSHAW COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PALMETTO COUNCIL INC SCOUTING AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nutramax Family FoundationSC28.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nutramax Family Foundation · The Springs Close Foundation Inc · Comporium Foundation Inc · Arras Foundation · Central Carolina Community Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Brady Foundation · Leadership Kershaw Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Health Foundation of Kershaw County · Kershawhealth · Sisters of Charity Foundation of South Carolina

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John T Stevens Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John T Stevens Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John T Stevens Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John T Stevens Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 137 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John T Stevens’ filings →

    More from the funding graph