Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Kershawhealth

KERSHAWHEALTH continues to work to improve the health and well-being of the residents of kershaw county and surrounding communities.

$672k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$2.4MFood & Nutrition$531kHousing & Shelter$275kPhilanthropy$125kRecreation & Sports$81kArts & Culture$57kYouth Development$52kEducation$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $178k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $475k
$32,230
Median grant
1
States reached
$113M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY MEDICAL CLINIC$200,000
UNITED WAY OF KERSHAW COUNTY$175,000
FOOD FOR THE SOUL$100,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF KERSHAW COUNTY$34,000
KERSHAW COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT$33,825
KNIGHTS HILL HISTORIC PRESERVATION$32,230
LYTTLETON STREET UNITED METHODIST$25,000
SANTEE-WATEREE COMMUNITY MENTAL$25,000
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$17,850
FCA OF KERSHAW COUNTY$10,000
ORDINARY CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%YMCA OF COLUMBIA: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Kershawhealth’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in SC; read by stated purpose it is 95% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Kershawhealthlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.5M · 8 repeat orgs$153k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$3.5M
$68k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+2713%

Still filing today

63%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    COMMUNITY MEDICAL CLINIC OF KERSHAW
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +272% · 47% of their budget
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF KERSHAW COUNTY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $583k · revenue +110%
  • FF
    FOOD FOR THE SOUL-KERSHAW COUNTY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $376k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • IS
    IRON SHARPENS INRON CONSULTING GROU
    one grant, 2022 · $38k
  • TY
    The Young Men's Christian Assoc of Columbia SC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +7%
  • AC
    ASSOCIATED CHARITIES OF KERSHAW COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue ×28 · 30% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Community Ministries of Kershaw County

Christian Community Ministries is a financial crisis ministry helping those who fall within our definition of crisis. Except for one paid administrator, we are a totally volunteer organization. We operate as an extension of the servant…

Religion
2
Sc Chamber of Commerce

Enhancing the quality of life for all south carolinians, achieving global competiteveness and ultimately increasing prosperity for sc citizens.

3
Clemson Area Chamber of Commerce Inc

Our mission is to deliver invaluable information, outstanding services, and impactful advocacy to members by empowering businesses and individuals and contributing to the prosperity of the clemson area.

4
College of Charleston Alumni Association

The association works to build a culture of pride and engagement by ensuring alumni from the college of charleston stay informed, get involved, and give back.

Education
5
Kershaw Foundation
Unclassified
6
Kerr County United Way

Kerr county united way (kcuw) provides an avenue for consolidating the fund raising efforts of many charities into one fund drive. kcuw has an annual fund drive and then grants funds to non-profits in kerr county that have applied for…

7
Kershaw Community Park Council Inc

Making improvments to the revitalization of and ongoing maintenance of stevens park in kershaw, south carolina. we focus on enhancing the natural areas for outdoor enjoyment and the building of additional recreational facilities to…

Recreation & Sports
8
Kansas City Country Club

The kansas city country club is a traditional, private, family-oriented country club dedicated to providing outstanding year-round dining, social and athletic activities to its members and their guests through superior services, staff and…

9
Kershaw County Farmers Market

Farmers market for the local community

Community Improvement
10
Foundation for the Carolinas

Inspiring philanthropy and strengthening our region through innovative community initiatives and quality services to donors and constituents.

Philanthropy
11
Sumter County Commission On Alcohol and Drug Abuse

Empowering people in sumter county sc to live free from substance abuse through a continuum of high quality services.

Health
12
South Carolina Christian Chamber of Commerce

To unify christians in south carolina by connecting commerce and community to positively impact our culture for christ.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Kershaw County and the most unlike its peers is Associated Charities of Kershaw County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY MEDICAL CLINIC OF KERSHAW — $2,028,919 · HealthCOMMUNITY MEDICAL CLINIC OF KERSHAWKERSHAW COUNTY COMMISSION ON ALCOHO DRUG ABUSE — $94,916 · HealthUNITED WAY OF KERSHAW COUNTY — $582,564 · OtherUNITED WAY OF KERSHAW COUNTYUSC School of Medicine Greenville — $155,277 · OtherUSC School of Medicine Greenvil…KERSHAW COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT — $148,201 · OtherKERSHAW COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTKNIGHTS HILL HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD INC — $57,230 · OtherKNIGHTS HILL HISTORIC PRESERVAT…IRON SHARPENS INRON CONSULTING GROU — $37,697 · Other+3 more — $37,500 · OtherFOOD FOR THE SOUL-KERSHAW COUNTY INC — $375,775 · EducationFOOD FOR THE …University of South Carolina Educational Foundation — $25,000 · EducationUniversity of…CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $17,850 · EducationBoys & Girls Club of Kershaw County — $51,600 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Young Men's Christian Assoc of Columbia SC — $25,000 · Human Services
Health$2,123,835Other$1,018,469Education$418,625Youth Development$61,600Human Services$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY MEDICAL CLINIC OF KERSHAW — $2,028,919 over 8y, 47% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KERSHAW COUNTY — $582,564 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetFOOD FOR THE SOUL-KERSHAW COUNTY INC — $375,775 over 5y, 19% of budgetKERSHAW COUNTY COMMISSION ON ALCOHO DRUG ABUSE — $94,916 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Kershaw County — $51,600 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetThe Young Men's Christian Assoc of Columbia SC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $17,850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATED CHARITIES OF KERSHAW COUNTY — $5,000 over 1y, 30% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Health Foundation of Kershaw CountySC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Health Foundation of Kershaw County · John T Stevens Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kershawhealth funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kershawhealth?

    Find your warmest path to Kershawhealth through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph