Skip to content
John Randolph Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

John Randolph Foundation Inc

The john randolph foundation is a community-based foundation organized exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes including, but not limited to, the promotion of health in the city of hopewell, virginia and the surrounding area.

$586k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$627kHealth$599kEducation$240kRecreation & Sports$53kPublic Safety & Disaster$48kPhilanthropy$45kCommunity Improvement$40kHousing & Shelter$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $288,292, the rows itemized in this filing. The $586,120 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $297,828 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k12 grants · $236k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$19,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL VIRGINIA HEALTH SERVICES$52,000
HISTORIC HOPEWELL FOUNDATION$47,200
SOUTHEAST 4-H EDUCATIONAL CENTER$23,833
LAMB CENTER FOR ARTS AND HEALING$23,500
AMERICAN RED CROSS OF CAPITAL VA$20,000
APPOMATTOX REGIONAL LIBRARY SYSTEM$19,700
WOOD DALE SWIM CLUB FOUNDATION$19,600
CULTUREWORKS INC$19,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC$15,000
ATLANTIC EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS INC$14,167
APPOMATTOX REGIONAL GOVERNOR'S SCHOOL$12,292
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF RICHMOND$12,000
PROJECT HOMES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF CAPITAL VA: $23k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF CAPITAL VA: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 7 repeat orgs$519k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +120% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
18

Total granted

$1.6M
$379k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+120%
+40%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $139k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterScience & TechRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CV
    CENTRAL VIRGINIA HEALTH SERVICES INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $484k · revenue +120%
  • HH
    HISTORIC HOPEWELL FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $391k · revenue +194% · 68% of their budget
  • TC
    THE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $119k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • PG
    PRINCE GEORGE COUNTY SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2023 · $71k
  • GR
    GREATER RICHMOND FIT4KIDS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $45k · revenue -9%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE LOWER APPOMATTOX RIVERgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southwest Virginia Community Health Systems Inc

Provide comprehensive primary medical care to the communities served.

Health
2
SeniorNavigatorcom

SeniorNavigator and its family of websites are national models for aging, disability and veteran information. By combining online assistance with a network of community-based centers, the websites bring over 26,000 community resources,…

Community Improvement
3
Virginia Community Food Connections

Our mission is to ensure the availability, access, and affordability of locally produced food by connecting local farmers and all members of the community through programs, awareness, and advocacy.

Food & Nutrition
4
Federation of Virginia Food Banks

Facilitating statewide collaboration among Virginia's food banks, partners, and neighbors to improve nutrition security and empower strong, healthy communities.

—
5
Charlottesville Regional Chamber of Comm

The charlottesville regional chamber of commerce is a non-profit corporation organized under the laws of the commonwealth of virginia for the purpose of representing private enterprise, promoting business, economic growth and vitality, and…

—
6
Virginia Community Action Partnership Inc

Virginia community action partnership (vacap) is the statewide membership association for virginia's thirty-one non-profit and public community action agencies. vacaps mission is to build the capacity and competencies of virginias…

Human Services
7
Community Health Center of Richmond Inc

The organization's mission is to sustain a vibrant, healthy and strong community through affordable, culturally competent, quality primary health care.

Health
8
The Commonwealth Institute for

To use policy, research, and analysis to advance the well-being of Virginia communities, and improve the economic security and social opportunities of all Virginians.

Public Benefit
9
Community Memorial Hospital

To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.

Health
10
Virginia Center for Inclusive Communities

VCIC works with schools, businesses, and communities to achieve success through inclusion.

Civil Rights
11
Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce

Chamberrva is the trusted voice for modern business in the richmond virginia region. we are change agents, rallying to do the hard things that will create a more connected, prosperous, health and equitable community.

—
12
Greater Richmond Partnership Inc

GRP's mission is to aggressively generate economic opportunities that create quality jobs for residents in the region and increase the tax base for needed community services.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Virginia Health Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is CultureWorks Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BEACON THEATER 2012 LLC: $282,735 · OtherBEACON THEATER 2012 LLCAPPOMATTOX REGIONAL LIBRARY SYSTEM: $183,883 · OtherAPPOMATTOX REGIONAL LIBRARY SYSTEMPRINCE GEORGE COUNTY SCHOOLS: $71,274 · OtherPRINCE GEORGE COUNTY SCHOOLS+18 more: $290,691 · Other+18 moreCENTRAL VIRGINIA HEALTH SERVICES INC: $484,283 · HealthCENTRAL VIRGINIA HEALTH SERVICES IN…THE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC: $118,813 · HealthTHE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC+3 more: $41,625 · Health+3 moreHISTORIC HOPEWELL FOUNDATION INC: $391,136 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC HOPEWELL FOUND…LAMB CENTER FOR ARTS AND HEALING: $23,500 · Arts & CultureLAMB CENTER FOR ARTS AN…+1 more: $12,000 · Arts & CultureELDERHOMES CORPORATION: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterGREATER RICHMOND FIT4KIDS INC: $44,700 · PhilanthropyAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $43,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE LOWER APPOMATTOX RIVER: $35,000 · Environment
Other$828,583Health$644,721Arts & Culture$426,636Housing & Shelter$50,000Philanthropy$44,700Human Services$43,000Environment$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTRAL VIRGINIA HEALTH SERVICES INC: $484,283 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHISTORIC HOPEWELL FOUNDATION INC: $391,136 over 9y, 68% of budgetTHE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC: $118,813 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetELDERHOMES CORPORATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER RICHMOND FIT4KIDS INC: $44,700 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $43,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LOWER APPOMATTOX RIVER: $35,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetTHE MADDIE MANN FOUNDATION FOR ACCESSIBLE PLAY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 67% of budgetSOUTHSIDE VIRGINIA EMERGENCY CREW INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHOPEWELL DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP INC: $23,271 over 1y, 15% of budgetREACH OUT FOR LIFE: $20,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCOMMONWEALTH CENTER FOR ADVANCED MANUFACTURING: $19,618 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCultureWorks Inc: $19,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMETROPOLITAN RICHMOND SPORTS BACKERS: $17,420 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOLONIAL HEIGHTS FOOD PANTRY INC: $16,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetConexus: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetChildren's Museum of Richmond: $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe James House InterventionPrevention Services Inc: $8,580 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCRATER COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $6,625 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVIRGINIA DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION: $5,854 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John Randolph Foundat…The Cameron FoundationThe Community Foundat…The Titmus FoundationDominion Energy Chari…Altria Companies Empl…Robins FoundationRichmond Memorial Hea…The Mary Morton Parso…Carmax FoundationColeman a Hunter - Ir…The Pauley Family Fou…
John Randolph Foundation Support Fund IncVA43.2× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John Randolph Foundation Support Fund Inc · The Cameron Foundation · The Community Foundation Inc · The Titmus Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Altria Companies Employee Community Fund · Robins Foundation · Richmond Memorial Health Foundation · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Coleman a Hunter - Irr Tr Chari · The Pauley Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John Randolph Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John Randolph Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John Randolph’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home