· Public charity
John Q Hammons Foundation Inc
None
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2018.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under $10k13 grants · $104k
- $10k–50k30 grants · $653k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $182k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDRENS SMILE CENTER | $72,969 |
| SILVER DOLLAR CITY FOUNDATION | $55,440 |
| FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES | $53,891 |
| SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN | $49,179 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE OZARKS INC | $41,793 |
| CARDINALS CARE FOUNDATION | $38,724 |
| CHANCES OF STONE COUNTY INC | $36,010 |
| MUSIC THERAPY OF THE OZARKS | $33,377 |
| LEGAL SERVICES OF SOUTHERN MISSOURI | $30,113 |
| A SPORTING CHANCE | $26,908 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE OZARKS | $23,537 |
| THE ARC OF THE OZARKS FOUNDATION | $22,985 |
| CHRISTIAN COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS CENTER | $22,740 |
| CHAMPIONS COMMITTED TO KIDS | $22,143 |
| CONVOY OF HOPE | $22,044 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $127k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
39 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2018, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES2× · 2017–2018 · $117k · revenue +120%
- SDSILVER DOLLAR CITY FOUNDATION INC2× · 2017–2018 · $110k · revenue +36%
- CSCHILDRENS SMILE CENTER CSC2× · 2017–2018 · $108k · revenue +211%
Funded once
- TSTHE SUMMIT PREPARATORY SCHOOL OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURIgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +52%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ALUMNI ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To be a leader in service delivery for persons with disabilities by providing an array of supports and services to integrate them into their communities and to enhance the quality of their lives.
Child safe of central missouri's mission is to respond to and prevent child abuse by providing advocacy, support, and resources to children who are alleged victims of abuse and other traumatic crimes, and to their non-offending family…
To provide year-round sports training and athletic competition in a variety of olympic-type sports for all children and adults with intellectual disabilities giving them continuing opportunities to develop physical fitness, demonstrate…
To render constructive civic service, including the sponsorship of social, educational, and economic projects for the promotion of the welfare of the community and the citizens of the ozarks situated in baxter, boone, marion, newton,…
Developmental center of the ozarks makes a positive difference in the community by providing services which enable individuals to reach and maintain their optimal level of development.
The mission of the community clinic of southwest missouri is to improve the health of people in our community without access to medical, dental, or mental health care.
Nova center of the ozarks, inc strives to make possible the potential for positive change in the quality of life for every individual with a developmental disability, regardless of the nature of that disability.
Renewing the land of opportunity by simplifying government and solving generational problems for the next generation.
True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.
Reduce the stigma and promote awareness surrounding mental health within the communities we serve, promote wellness, and provide individualized care with an integrated approach.
To provide high quality care and set the standards of excellence for those we serve.
Provide integrated, patient-centered health services designed to meet the needs of all patients, regardless of ability to pay; help the healthcare industry better serve patients & community by promoting public health; supporting…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc and the most unlike its peers is Silver Dollar City Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds SILVER DOLLAR CITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS SMILE CENTER CSC ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
- Who funds BURRELL INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS CARDINALS COMMUNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds CHANCES OF STONE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Legal Services of Southern Missouri ↗
- Who funds White River Valley Electric Trust INC ↗
- Who funds A SPORTING CHANCE ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SPRINGFIELD INC ↗
- Who funds MUSIC THERAPY OF THE OZARKS ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF THE OZARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE OZARKS ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SPRINGFIELD INC ↗
- Who funds CHAMPION ATHLETES OF THE OZARKS ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME GROUP OF THE OZARKS ↗
- Who funds HEART OF THE OZARKS JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WHETSTONE BOYS RANCH ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS CENTER DBA FREEDOMS REST ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI JUNIOR GOLF SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL OZARK EM ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DIAPER BANK OF THE OZARKS ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds NAMI of Southwest Missouri Inc ↗
- Who funds FORDLAND CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds DOGWOOD RANCH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Missouri Sports Hall of Fame · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Rick and Marsha Floyd Foundation · Robert M - Bobby - Allison Charitable Tr · Arvest Foundation · Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Musgrave Foundation · United Way of the Ozarks Inc · Cook Family Foundation · Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation · Timken Foundation of Canton
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization John Q Hammons Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to John Q Hammons Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to John Q Hammons Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.