Skip to content
John Pritzker Family Fund at a glance

· Private foundation

John Pritzker Family Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17M
Granted FY2024still arriving
98
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$67MArts & Culture$28MEnvironment$14MRecreation & Sports$13MInternational$8.7MEducation$7.9MPhilanthropy$7.8MHuman Services$4.4MOther$0
02FY2024 · 98 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k40 grants · $818k
  • $50k–250k35 grants · $3.6M
  • $250k+13 grants · $13M
$35,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Metropolitan Museum of Art$5,000,000
University of California San Francisco Foundation$2,500,000
University of California San Francisco Foundation$1,666,667
Menlo College$500,000
Illuminate the Arts$500,000
American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc$500,000
The Metropolitan Museum of Art$355,000
Jewish Federation Bay Area$333,333
IsraAID (US) Global Humanitarian Assistance Inc$250,000
PEF Israel Endowment Funds Inc$250,000
Jewish Community Relations Council$250,000
Corporation of the Fine Arts Museums$250,000
Contina Impact (formerly Policy Impact)$250,000
Anti-Defamation League$200,000
KQED Inc$200,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Peninsula Jewish Community Center: $100k → 7%Osher Marin Jewish Community Center: $100k → 8%Workmoney Foundation Inc: $100k → 17%Peninsula Jewish Community Center: $100k → 7%Osher Marin Jewish Community Center: $100k → 8%Workmoney Foundation Inc: $100k → 17%Peninsula Jewish Community Center: $100k → 7%Osher Marin Jewish Community Center: $100k → 8%Peninsula Jewish Community Center: $50k → 7%Osher Marin Jewish Community Center: $50k → 8%Peninsula Jewish Community Center: $50k → 7%Osher Marin Jewish Community Center: $50k → 8%Jewish Silicon Valley (formerly Addison-Penzak Jew: $45k → 8%Jewish Silicon Valley (formerly Addison-Penzak Jew: $25k → 8%Jewish Silicon Valley (formerly Addison-Penzak Jew: $25k → 8%Jewish Silicon Valley (AKA Addison-Penzak Jewish): $25k → 8%More in Common Inc: $250k → 17%Addison-Penzak Jewish Community Center: $25k → 8%More in Common Inc: $250k → 17%Jewish Community Center of the East Bay: $50k → 10%Jewish Community Center of the East Bay: $50k → 10%Jewish Community Center of the East Bay: $50k → 10%Jewish Community Center of the East Bay: $25k → 10%Jewish Community Center of the East Bay: $25k → 10%Jewish Community Center of San Francisco: $200k → 10%Jewish Community Center of San Francisco: $200k → 10%Jewish Community Center of San Francisco: $155k → 10%Jewish Community Center of San Francisco: $150k → 10%Jewish Community Center of San Francisco: $100k → 10%Jewish Community Center of San Francisco: $100k → 10%Jewish Community Center of San Francisco: $100k → 10%Jewish Community Center of San Francisco: $100k → 10%Jewish Community Center of San Francisco: $75k → 10%Jewish Community Center of San Francisco: $50k → 10%Jewish Community Center of San Francisco: $50k → 10%Tides Center Shalom Bayit: $25k → 10%Jewish Community Center of San Francisco: $50k → 10%Tides Center Shalom Bayit: $25k → 10%Tides Center Shalom Bayit: $25k → 10%Children's Council of San Francisco: $25k → 10%Women in Need Inc: $50k → 17%Jewish Family and Children's Services: $133k → 10%Jewish Family and Children's Services: $50k → 10%Mind Share Partners: $75k → 10%Mind Share Partners: $75k → 10%Mind Share Partners: $50k → 10%Mind Share Partners: $50k → 10%Mind Share Partners: $50k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DE
NC
DC
HI
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$122M · 140 repeat orgs$42M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

140 repeat relationships: 65 still active in FY2024, 75 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

140
133

Total granted

$122M
$41M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+28%

Still filing today

88%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $668k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    6× · 2019–2024 · $13M · revenue +76%
  • THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND
    5× · 2017–2023 · $13M · revenue +109%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART
    7× · 2017–2024 · $10M · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • TR
    THE REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF CA
    one grant, 2017 · $29M
  • UO
    Univ of CA San Fran Foundation Dept of Psychiatry
    one grant, 2023 · $3.2M
  • UO
    Univ of CA San Fran Foundation Nancy Pritzker Bldg
    one grant, 2023 · $2.5M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Sandler Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy
3
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
4
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
5
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
6
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
7
Sf Partnership

SF Partnership is an organization comprised of SF's leading employers dedicated to supporting an equitable, resilient, and vibrant economy shared by all people working and living in San Francisco. Through education, advocacy, and research,…

—
8
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
9
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
10
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
11
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
12
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma; the most unlike its peers is Hyatt Hotels Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

243 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 243 of the 300 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
35
Early backer (in before they grew)
239/243
Grantees still filing
165/243
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF CA: $28,750,000 · OtherTHE REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF CASan Francisco Recreation & Parks: $5,442,450 · OtherSan Francisco Recreation & ParksUniv of CA San Fran Foundation Dept of Psychiatry: $3,166,667 · OtherUniv of CA San Fran Foundation Nancy Pritzker Bldg: $2,500,000 · OtherCONGREGATION EMANU-EL: $2,381,550 · Other+113 more: $28,533,333 · Other+113 moreUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $29,541,084 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNI…NLI USA INC: $2,500,000 · EducationNLI USA INC+20 more: $2,621,000 · Education+20 moreMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $13,123,334 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEU…SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $10,367,500 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO MUSE…KQED INC: $1,325,000 · Arts & Culture+19 more: $2,920,833 · Arts & Culture+19 moreTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $12,597,550 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST F…GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY: $2,212,500 · EnvironmentGOLDEN GATE…CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $1,050,000 · EnvironmentCLEAN AIR T…+4 more: $908,333 · Environment+4 moreJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $3,693,834 · PhilanthropyTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $3,331,500 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyHOPEWELL FUND: $725,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $462,500 · PhilanthropyTHE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES: $400,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $380,000 · Philanthropy+10 more: $533,750 · PhilanthropyThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $2,470,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF IR DAVID INC: $666,666 · InternationalTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $620,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $400,000 · InternationalTilting Futures Incorporated: $350,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $285,000 · International+6 more: $760,000 · InternationalSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE: $4,345,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP RAMAH IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $155,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$70,774,000Education$34,662,084Arts & Culture$27,736,667Environment$16,768,383Philanthropy$10,526,584International$5,551,666Recreation & Sports$4,500,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $29,541,084 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $13,123,334 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $12,597,550 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $10,367,500 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE: $4,345,000 over 7y, 25% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $3,693,834 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $3,331,500 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetNLI USA INC: $2,500,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $2,470,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY: $2,212,500 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA: $1,935,000 over 7y, 6.7% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $1,330,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetKQED INC: $1,325,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,205,000 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetPROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT: $1,100,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetMENLO COLLEGE: $1,052,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $1,050,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $925,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetBRING CHANGE 2 MIND: $925,000 over 6y, 9.7% of budgetCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $855,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND: $725,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF IR DAVID INC: $666,666 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetSAFE & SOUND: $627,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $620,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND: $600,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetPEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC: $600,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $575,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetILLUMINATE THE ARTS: $510,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetCENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL: $500,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetSTATES UNITED DEMOCRACY CENTER INC: $500,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetMORE IN COMMON INC: $500,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetTHE JEWISH HOME AND SENIOR LIVING FOUNDATION: $475,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $462,500 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetTHE COMMONWEALTH CLUB - WORLD AFFAIRS OF CALIFORNIA: $418,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetTAWONGA JEWISH COMMUNITY CORPORATION: $405,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetThe Center for Election Innovation & Research: $400,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetTHE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES: $400,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPENINSULA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $400,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetBERNARD OSHER MARIN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $400,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $400,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNeighbors for a Better San Francisco: $399,000 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetCONTINA IMPACT: $387,500 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetBOOKER T WASHINGTON COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER: $385,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $383,334 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $380,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThat Man May See Inc DBA All May See Foundation: $375,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetMIND SHARE PARTNERS: $360,000 over 6y, 7.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA ↗
  • Who funds TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds NLI USA INC ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIN & PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds MENLO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds BRING CHANGE 2 MIND ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF IR DAVID INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE & SOUND ↗
  • Who funds THE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND ↗
  • Who funds PEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ILLUMINATE THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL ↗
  • Who funds STATES UNITED DEMOCRACY CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Fede…Lisa Stone Pritzker F…The San Francisco Fou…Koret FoundationLisa & Douglas Goldma…Marin Community Found…The Shimon Ben Joseph…Silicon Valley Commun…The William & Flora H…Ralph & Marsha Guggen…Howard and Irene Levi…The Laszlo N Tauber F…
Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA91.1× affinity60 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Lisa Stone Pritzker Family Fund · The San Francisco Foundation · Koret Foundation · Lisa & Douglas Goldman Fund · Marin Community Foundation · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Ralph & Marsha Guggenheim Family Foundation · Howard and Irene Levine Family Foundation · The Laszlo N Tauber Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John Pritzker Family Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John Pritzker Family Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    7get no government money at all
    52report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John Pritzker Family Fund?

    Find your warmest path to John Pritzker Family Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 300 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John Pritzker Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home