Skip to content

· Private foundation

John P Kavooras Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$300k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$514kReligion$410kArts & Culture$245kFood & Nutrition$243kInternational$150kPublic Benefit$65kYouth Development$33kHealth$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $270k
$19,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARK GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH$43,400
XCEL FLORIDA MENTORING NETWORK$33,300
BOYNTON CULTURAL CENTRE INC$33,300
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$26,000
MERCY HOMES FOR BOYS AND GIRLS$25,000
NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK$25,000
WATERORG$20,000
WILLOW CREEK COMMUNITY CHURCH$19,000
JUDICIAL WATCH$15,000
FAMILY LIFE$10,000
HEARTLIGHT MINISTRIES$10,000
BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL$10,000
MORNING STAR MISSION MINISTRIES$9,000
CHILDRENS HEALTH DEFENSE$8,000
WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHARITY GLOBAL INC: $2k → 17%BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%HEARTLIGHT MINISTRIES: $10k → 16%MORNING STAR MISSION MINISTRIES: $9k → 7%HEARTLIGHT MINISTRIES: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
CA
MO
AR
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 20 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
4

Total granted

$1.6M
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+17%

Still filing today

65%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalArts & CultureFood & NutritionEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Global
    6× · 2020–2025 · $193k · revenue +82%
  • BC
    BOYNTON CULTURAL CENTRE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $190k · revenue +14%
  • NI
    NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $176k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue +17%
  • LC
    LAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER DBA A SAFE PLACE
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • GL
    GREEN LAKE ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +51%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
2
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
5
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
6
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
7
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
8
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
9
World Coffee Research

World coffee research unites the global coffee industry to drive science-based agricultural solutions to urgently secure a diverse and sustainable supply of quality coffee today and for generations to come. our mission is to grow, protect,…

International
10
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
11
International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management Inc I

To end hunger and advance sustainable development by 2030 through science and innovation to transform food, land and water systems with aquatic foods for healthier people and planet.

—
12
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Waterorg; the most unlike its peers is Green Lake Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH OF ST MARK OF BOCA RATON FLORIDA INC: $250,200 · OtherGREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH OF ST MARK OF BOCA RAT…WILLOW CREEK COMMUNITY CHURCH INC: $97,000 · OtherWILLOW CREEK COMMUNITY CHURCH INCMERCY HOMES FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $95,000 · OtherMERCY HOMES FOR BOYS AND GIRLSFAMILY LIFE: $40,000 · OtherFAMILY LIFEXCEL FLORIDA MENTORING NETWORK: $33,300 · OtherLONG GROVE CHURCH: $30,000 · OtherWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC: $23,000 · OtherBRIGHT HOPE INT'L MISSIONARY ENTERPRISES: $23,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $28,000 · Other+5 more: $54,000 · Other+5 moreBOYNTON CULTURAL CENTRE INC: $189,900 · Arts & CultureBOYNTON CULTURAL…INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $55,000 · Arts & CultureINTERLOCHEN CENT…Ronald McDonald House Global: $193,000 · HealthRonald McDon…AID TO VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE INC: $156,600 · Human ServicesAID TO VICTI…HEARTLIGHT MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesHEARTLIGHT M…BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 · Human ServicesMORNING STAR MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $9,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $176,000 · Food & NutritionNORTHERN ILL…GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $8,000 · Food & NutritionWATERORG: $82,000 · InternationalWATERORGBread for the World Institute: $50,000 · InternationalBread for t…INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $45,000 · InternationalINTERNATION…JUDICIAL WATCH INC: $45,000 · Public Benefit
Other$673,500Arts & Culture$244,900Health$193,000Human Services$192,600Food & Nutrition$184,000International$177,000Public Benefit$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $193,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBOYNTON CULTURAL CENTRE INC: $189,900 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $176,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAID TO VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE INC: $156,600 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetWATERORG: $82,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $55,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBread for the World Institute: $50,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $45,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $28,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTE: $20,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHEARTLIGHT MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN LAKE ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
  • Who funds BOYNTON CULTURAL CENTRE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds AID TO VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERORG ↗
  • Who funds INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Bread for the World Institute ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTE ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLIGHT MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MORNING STAR MISSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds LAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GREEN LAKE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John P Kavooras Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John P Kavooras Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John P Kavooras’ filings →

    More from the funding graph