Skip to content

· Private foundation

John L & Margaret Riegel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$60kEducation$54kHealth$45kPhilanthropy$24kInternational$14kHousing & Shelter$11kFood & Nutrition$10kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$107k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Manomet$10,000
Michael J Fox Foundation$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
East Woods School$2,000
Berkshire School$2,000
Neighborhood Coalition$2,000
Williams College$1,500
Darien Foundation$1,000
NPR$1,000
Flying Kites$1,000
Riegelsville Library$1,000
Tufts University$1,000
Second Harvest Food Bank$1,000
Cooper Union$1,000
Riegelsville Historical Society$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Red Cross: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
MO
MD
AZ
TN
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 18% of John L & Margaret Riegel Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

John L & Margaret Riegel Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$195k · 23 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
14

Total granted

$195k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
0%

Still filing today

57%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MI
    MANOMET INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +76%
  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    6× · 2020–2025 · $24k · revenue +250%
  • TB
    THE BERKSHIRE SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • HC
    HOUR CHILDCARE
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • ES
    EMPTY STOCKING FUND FORMERLY BGL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +123%
  • GL
    GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +66%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
8
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
9
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
10
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
11
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Empty Stocking Fund Formerly Bgl Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
19/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNeighborhood Coalition: $10,500 · OtherNeighborhood CoalitionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $6,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKRIEGELSVILLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6,000 · OtherRIEGELSVILLE HISTORICAL SOCIETYRiegelsville Library: $6,000 · OtherRiegelsville LibraryCooper Union: $5,500 · OtherCooper UnionPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $3,000 · Other+17 more: $13,800 · Other+17 moreMANOMET INC: $60,000 · EnvironmentMANOMET INCTHE BERKSHIRE SCHOOL INC: $8,750 · EducationTHE BERKSHIRE SCHO…Trustees of Tufts College: $5,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts …GRIFFIN NURSERY SCHOOL: $5,000 · EducationGRIFFIN NURSERY SC…THE DARIEN FOUNDATION INC: $4,800 · EducationTHE DARIEN FOUNDAT…TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON…Williams College: $4,000 · EducationWilliams CollegeTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $3,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF DEERFI…EAST WOODS SCHOOL INC: $2,000 · Education+2 more: $2,000 · EducationTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $24,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL…+1 more: $300 · HealthROCKEFELLER FAMILY FUND INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER…PERSON TO PERSON INC: $2,700 · PhilanthropyPERSON TO P…EMPTY STOCKING FUND FORMERLY BGL FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyFLYING KITES INC: $7,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $500 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $500 · International+1 more: $400 · InternationalLATINITAS INC: $2,300 · Youth Development
Other$66,800Environment$60,000Education$38,550Health$24,300Philanthropy$23,700International$14,400Youth Development$2,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMANOMET INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROCKEFELLER FAMILY FUND INC: $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BERKSHIRE SCHOOL INC: $8,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFLYING KITES INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $5,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DARIEN FOUNDATION INC: $4,800 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWilliams College: $4,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPERSON TO PERSON INC: $2,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLATINITAS INC: $2,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEAST WOODS SCHOOL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEMPTY STOCKING FUND FORMERLY BGL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKS SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILTON ACADEMY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCURE TAY-SACHS FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC CITIZEN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MANOMET INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER FAMILY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BERKSHIRE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds FLYING KITES INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds GRIFFIN NURSERY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE DARIEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Williams College ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds PERSON TO PERSON INC ↗
  • Who funds LATINITAS INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST WOODS SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds EMPTY STOCKING FUND FORMERLY BGL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MILTON ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds PASADENA HUMANE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Alameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John L & Margaret Riegel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John L & Margaret Riegel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Manomet Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Person to Person Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Milton Academy: 0% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John L & Margaret Riegel’s filings →

More from the funding graph