Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

John J & Josephine Thomas Charitable

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2022
19
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$15k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of John J & Josephine Thomas Charitable’s FY2023 grant dollars went to The Fund For Charitable Giving, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year John J & Josephine Thomas Charitable named its own grantees at scale: 12 organizations, $64k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
20
12
21
12
22
0
23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202023.

Philanthropy$1.3MFood & Nutrition$45kHealth$43kReligion$22kHuman Services$19kEducation$14kHousing & Shelter$12kCrime & Legal$4kOther$0
02FY2022 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k17 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST VINCENT DE PAUL KITCHEN$15,000
ST ANTHONYST GEORGE MARONITE$10,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH$6,000
WYOMING VALLEY CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION$4,500
PATHWAYS COUNSELING & GROWTH CENTER$4,500
COMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY OF$4,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICE CENTER INC$3,000
ANTHONY THOMAS MEMORIAL LECTURE SERIES$3,000
FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF WYOMING$2,000
UNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY$2,000
VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER$1,634
CROHN'S AND COLITIS FOUNDATION OF$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
HOYT LIBRARY$1,000
OSTERHOUT FREE LIBRARY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 15%VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 15%VALLEY SANTA INC: $1k → 15%VALLEY SANTA INC: $1k → 15%VALLEY SANTA INC: $1k → 15%VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$175k · 20 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
1

Total granted

$175k
$3k

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY OF LUZERNE COUNTY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $12k · revenue +37%
  • PC
    PATHWAYS COUNSELING AND GROWTH CENTER
    3× · 2020–2022 · $11k · revenue +62%
  • WV
    WYOMING VALLEY CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $10k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • AT
    ANTHONY THOMAS MEMORIAL LECTURE SERIES
    one grant, 2022 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayne Memorial Community Health Centers

Wayne Memorial Community Health Centers creates and sustains healthy rural communities by providing accessible, high quality medical, dental and behavioral health care for all, while recognizing and addressing other factors that influence…

Health
2
Crime Victims' Center of Chester County

The crime victims' center of chester county, inc. (cvc) is a nonprofit agency providing free, immediate, and confidential crisis response and compassionate support to children and adults impacted by sexual violence and all other crime. we…

3
Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center

Strive to make better health easier by providing access to affordable, high quality health services through equitable, innovative, and inclusive care models that support patient care, education, research, & community service.

Health
4
Valley Community Library

Public lending library

5
Community Resources of Fayette County Inc

To prevent victimization, advocate for, and lessen suffering of victims of crime by providing services in a supportive, inclusive, and safe environment in fayette county.

Health
6
Victim Services Center of Montgomery County Inc

Vsc's mission is to provide advocacy and counseling for all who have been affected by sexual violence and other crimes against the person, and to promote sensitivity and awareness in the community through education.

Human Services
7
Adams County Library System Inc

The mission of the adams county library system (acls) is to connect people to opportunities that enrich their lives through the core values of stewardship, excellence and trustworthiness. the acls provides programming that centers on early…

8
Domestic Violence Center of Chester County

THE MISSION OF THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER OF CHESTER COUNTY IS TO REDUCE domestic violence by supporting survivors and advancing prevention strategies.

Human Services
9
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

10
Young Womens Christian Association of Hanover Pennsylvania

The ywca hanover is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

Environment
11
Wilkes-Barre Academy

Concerned with the development of their elementary/middle school students, the objective is to meet the academic, social, and personal needs and interests of the students for their growth and maturation toward independence, decision…

12
United Way of Berks County Inc

United way of berks county improves lives by inspiring collaboration, volunteerism and financial support to build a stronger community.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Wyoming Valley and the most unlike its peers is Hoyt Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE FUND FOR CHARITABLE GIVING — $1,292,391 · PhilanthropyTHE FUND FOR CHARITABLE GIVING+1 more — $5,000 · PhilanthropyST VINCENT DE PAUL KITCHEN — $44,653 · OtherST VINCENT…ST ANTHONYST GEORGE MARONITE — $22,000 · OtherST ANTHONY…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH — $18,000 · OtherST JUDE CH…PATHWAYS COUNSELING AND GROWTH CENTER — $11,000 · OtherPATHWAYS C…FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF WYOMING — $9,000 · OtherFAMILY SER…Individual grant recipient — $7,500 · OtherIndividual…CROHN'S AND COLITIS FOUNDATION OF — $4,500 · Other+5 more — $15,000 · Other+5 moreCOMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY OF LUZERNE COUNTY — $12,000 · Housing & ShelterDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICE CENTER INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesVICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER — $3,634 · Human ServicesVALLEY SANTA INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesWYOMING VALLEY CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION — $9,500 · HealthKING'S COLLEGE — $3,000 · EducationHOYT LIBRARY — $3,000 · EducationWILKES UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · Education
Philanthropy$1,297,391Other$131,653Housing & Shelter$12,000Human Services$11,634Health$9,500Education$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE FUND FOR CHARITABLE GIVING — $1,292,391 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCOMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY OF LUZERNE COUNTY — $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPATHWAYS COUNSELING AND GROWTH CENTER — $11,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetWYOMING VALLEY CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION — $9,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICE CENTER INC — $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER — $3,634 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKING'S COLLEGE — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOSTERHOUT FREE LIBRARY — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOYT LIBRARY — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY SANTA INC — $3,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetWILKES UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WYOMING VALLEY AREA YMCA — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FUND FOR CHARITABLE GIVING
  • Who funds COMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY OF LUZERNE COUNTY
  • Who funds PATHWAYS COUNSELING AND GROWTH CENTER
  • Who funds WYOMING VALLEY CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICE CENTER INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY
  • Who funds VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER
  • Who funds KING'S COLLEGE
  • Who funds OSTERHOUT FREE LIBRARY
  • Who funds HOYT LIBRARY
  • Who funds VALLEY SANTA INC
  • Who funds WILKES UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds GREATER WYOMING VALLEY AREA YMCA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

William G McGowan Charitable FundIL19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: William G McGowan Charitable Fund · The Tambur Family Foundation · Moses Taylor Foundation Inc · The Luzerne Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Nesbitt Family Charitable Foundation · Sordoni Foundation Inc · United Way of Wyoming Valley · Allone Foundation · Benco Family Foundation Fka Cohen Family Charitable Foundation · Allone Charities · Sordoni Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization John J & Josephine Thomas Charitable funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John J & Josephine Thomas Charitable?

    Find your warmest path to John J & Josephine Thomas Charitable through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph