· Private foundation
John Hung Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $171k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHINATOWN HEALTH CLINIC FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| CHINATOWN MANPOWER PROJECT | $30,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY GREATER NY | $21,000 |
| THE BUDDHIST SOCIETY | $20,000 |
| KHAWALUNG FOUNDATION USA | $10,000 |
| DHARMA SEAL MONASTERY | $10,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| VISITING NURSE SERVICE NY | $5,000 |
| YOUTH BUDDHISM COMMUNICATION | $3,000 |
| CHINESE FREEMASONS ATHLETIC CLUB | $3,000 |
| UNITED EAST ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| UNICEF | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
33 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CMCHINATOWN MANPOWER PROJECT INC4× · 2021–2024 · $90k · revenue +67%
- BTBUDDHIST TZU CHI MEDICAL FOUNDATION2× · 2019–2020 · $75k · revenue +24%
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC5× · 2017–2022 · $28k · revenue +98%
Funded once
- DLDORJE LING BUDDHIST CENTERone grant, 2021 · $10k
- CHCALVARY HOSPITAL INCone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +2%
- PHPROJECT H O P E INCone grant, 2020 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Chinese hospital, a community-owned, not-for-profit organization, exists primarily to deliver quality health care in a cost effective way, responsive to the community's ethnic and cultural uniqueness, providing access to health care and…
The Chinese American Medical Society (the Society) was created in the State of NY in 1964. Its mission is to improve the health status of Chinese Americans and to promote excellence in health care for all through the mobilization of health…
At apicha community health center, our mission is to provide high quality, equitable, whole person, and culturally responsive care delivered in an inclusive and welcoming manner.
Cpc's mission is to promote social and economic empowerment of chineseamerican, immigrant and low-income communities.
Chn provides a broad range of health services including but not limited to primary and preventative care, and mental health services to a largely medically underserved population.
To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.
Vns health is one of the nation's largest nonprofit home and community-based health care organizations. we help people live, age, and heal where they feel most comfortable. please refer to schedule o for additional information.
The chinese methodist center corporation (cmcc) serves families in nyc downtown community by providing affordable educational and enrichment programs for children and youth so they can build stronger foundations for a better life. cmcc is…
To broaden health care access, provide educational opportunities and services with a professional health team in a culturally sensitive fashion to the chinese population in the community. its objective is to meet the unmet healthcare needs…
Human rights in china, founded by chinese students and scholars in march 1989, is an international, chinese, nongovernmental organization with a mission to promote international human rights and advance the institutional protection of…
The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.
UFCH is dedicated to providing or facilitating access to critical medical care for Chinas most disadvantaged groups, including orphans, the homeless, abused women, migrants, and other groups in need of care
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brooklyn Chinese-American Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is New York City Rescue Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHINATOWN HEALTH CLINIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHINATOWN MANPOWER PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds BUDDHIST TZU CHI MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH BUDDHISM COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds HOUR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds CHARLES B WANG COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED EAST ATHLETICS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC ↗
- Who funds HAMILTON-MADISON HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CALVARY HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds DHARMA SEAL MONASTERY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds CHINESE FREE MASON ATHLETIC CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds CHINATOWN PARTNERSHIP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds AMITOFO CHARITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CREATE IN CHINATOWN INC ↗
- Who funds GARDEN OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN CHINESE-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Asian American Federation Inc · Asian American Coalition for Children and Families Inc · Cathay Bank Foundation · The Ong Family Foundation Co Law Office · American Express Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization John Hung Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.