Skip to content
John H Boner Community Center Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

John H Boner Community Center Inc

The john h.

$950k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$182kArts & Culture$145kHousing & Shelter$78kHuman Services$50kCommunity Improvement$41kRecreation & Sports$36kFood & Nutrition$13kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $36,862, the rows itemized in this filing. The $949,760 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $912,898 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$36,862
Median grant
1
States reached
$59M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EAST 10TH UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$36,862
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%ALLIANCE FOR STRONG FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES: $50k → 17%LYN HOUSE: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$449k · 6 repeat orgs$99k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
10

Total granted

$449k
$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
+149%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CAT HEAD PRESS PRINTSHOP AND ARTIST COLLABORATIVE
    3× · 2019–2021 · $140k · revenue +91% · 86% of their budget
  • NE
    NEAR EASTSIDE INNOVATION SCHOOL CORP
    3× · 2019–2023 · $77k · revenue +132%
  • EC
    Englewood Community Development Corp
    4× · 2017–2023 · $76k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOCIAL CURRENT INCgraduated
    2× · 2019–2020 · $50k · revenue +149%
  • IP
    INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2023 · $31k
  • IF
    INDY FOOD COOP II
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Enroll Indy Inc

Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…

Education
2
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
3
Industrial Council of Nearwest Chicago

Strengthen companies in the kinzie industrial corridor and facilitate economic and community development by providing services and incubator space.

—
4
Kipp Indianapolis Inc

KIPP Indy is a network of tuition-free, open-enrollment, college preparatory, public charter schools. KIPP Indy's mission is to create a network of schools that provides educationally underserved children with a rigorous education that…

Education
5
Integrated Community Solutions Inc

Bringing people together with quality services that promote self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
6
Enterprise Community Investment Inc

All our efforts support our strategic goals to increase housing supply, advance racial equity and build resilience and upward mobility.the organization raises private capital through investment and by forming effective partnerships.…

Housing & Shelter
7
Westside Community Development Corporation

Entity operates housing development programs for low-income individuals and economic development programs for a specified area within the city of indianapolis, indiana.

—
8
Northeast Indiana Innovation Center Inc

We are a comprehensive entrepreneurial center whose mission is putting business growth, innovation and entrepreneurship to work for northeast indiana

Community Improvement
9
Westside Neighborhood School

Wns is committed to creating a deeply caring community of lifelong learners that nurtures students from diverse backgrounds to reach their full potential, develop cultural competency, and inspire the world with their curiosity, innovation,…

Education
10
Intend Indiana Inc

Intend indiana connects people to opportunity and advances collaborative community development through financing and housing solutions.

Housing & Shelter
11
Early Learning Indiana Inc

Early learning indiana (eli) is on a mission to ensure every child is empowered with essential skills to thrive in kindergarten and beyond. (see schedule o for continuation)

Human Services
12
Near North Development Corporation

Inner-city housing and economic development focusing on low-income individuals.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Near Eastside Innovation School Corp; the most unlike its peers is Cat Head Press Printshop and Artist Collaborative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAT HEAD PRESS PRINTSHOP AND ARTIST COLLABORATIVE: $140,000 · OtherCAT HEAD PRESS PRINTSHOP AND ARTIST COLLABORATI…LANTERNS FOUNDATION INC: $45,500 · OtherLANTERNS FOUNDATION INCINDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $31,410 · OtherINDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLSINDY FOOD COOP II: $8,256 · Other+3 more: $2,600 · OtherEnglewood Community Development Corp: $75,643 · Housing & ShelterEnglewood Community Dev…NEAR EAST AREA RENEWAL INC: $37,630 · Housing & ShelterNEAR EAST AREA RENEWAL …+1 more: $2,130 · Housing & ShelterNEAR EASTSIDE INNOVATION SCHOOL CORP: $77,000 · EducationNEAR EASTSIDE IN…+1 more: $2,130 · EducationEAST 10TH CHILDREN AND YOUTH CENTERINC: $73,724 · Youth DevelopmentEAST 10TH CHILD…SOCIAL CURRENT INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesSOCIAL CUR…+1 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesINDIANAPOLIS PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$227,766Housing & Shelter$115,403Education$79,130Youth Development$73,724Human Services$51,500Recreation & Sports$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAT HEAD PRESS PRINTSHOP AND ARTIST COLLABORATIVE: $140,000 over 3y, 86% of budgetNEAR EASTSIDE INNOVATION SCHOOL CORP: $77,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetEnglewood Community Development Corp: $75,643 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetEAST 10TH CHILDREN AND YOUTH CENTERINC: $73,724 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetSOCIAL CURRENT INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetRENEW INDIANAPOLIS INC F/K/A THE LAND BANK OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $1,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLYN HOUSE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Indianapolis Foun…Central Indiana Commu…United Way of Central…Lilly Endowment IncThe Mind Trust IncRichard M Fairbanks F…Indianapolis Neighbor…Teachers Treasures IncNicholas H Noyes Jr M…Local Initiatives Sup…Natl Christian Charit…Fidelity Investments …
The Indianapolis Foundation IncIN25.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · The Mind Trust Inc · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Indianapolis Neighborhood Housing Partnership Inc · Teachers Treasures Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John H Boner Community Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John H Boner Community Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John H Boner Community Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home