· Public charity
Indianapolis Neighborhood Housing Partnership Inc
to create affordable housing solutions for people with low and moderate incomes, and collaborate to enhance the quality of life in Indianapolis neighborhoods.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 14 grants below total $1,068,298 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,048,920 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,980,622 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $52k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $750k
- $250k+1 grant · $251k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Near East Area Renewal (NEAR) | $250,500 |
| Martindale Brightwood Development Corporation (MBDC) | $145,000 |
| Near North Development Corporation (NNDC) | $139,000 |
| Southeast Neighborhood Development Corporation (SEND) | $113,048 |
| Partners in Housing Development Corporation | $102,500 |
| Community Action of Greater Indianapolis (CAGI) | $100,000 |
| Mapleton Fall Creek Development Corporation (MFCDC) | $100,000 |
| Westside Community Development Corporation | $50,000 |
| Cliff's Construction LLC | $20,000 |
| Greater Indianapolis Progress Committee | $12,000 |
| Local Initiative Support Corporation (LISC) | $10,000 |
| Corporation for Supportive Housing | $10,000 |
| Indy Chamber | $8,750 |
| Indianapolis Urban League | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $306k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
39 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NNNear North Development Corporation8× · 2017–2024 · $984k · revenue +50% · 41% of their budget
- SNSoutheast Neighborhood Development Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $739k · revenue +414% · 31% of their budget
- MFMAPLETON FALL CREEK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION8× · 2017–2024 · $713k · revenue +90%
Funded once
- E1Equity 1821 Incone grant, 2022 · $30k
- GIGreater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +154%
- IDINSIGHT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONone grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue -115%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.
Indianapolis Downtown Marketing, Inc. (IDMI) exists to improve downtown Indianapolis. IDMI focuses on marketing downtown businesses, destinations, organizations, activities and events.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Plan, coordinate and provide affordable housing to low-income individuals and families in Southeastern Indiana.
to create affordable housing solutions for people with low and moderate incomes, and collaborate to enhance the quality of life in Indianapolis neighborhoods.
Strengthen companies in the kinzie industrial corridor and facilitate economic and community development by providing services and incubator space.
Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…
To serve its members and local associations by providing leadership programs and services to sustain a healthy real estate market in indiana. in providing these services, the association will raise the standards of the real estate…
The construction and renovation of homes for low income families.
To mobilize people, ideas, and investments to make this a community where all individuals have equitable opportunity to reach their full potential - no matter place, race or identity.
GWIs mission is to foster the sustained regeneration, improvement and management of the environment by developing community-based partnerships which empower people, businesses and organizations to promote environmental, economic & social…
To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Intend Indiana Inc and the most unlike its peers is Roots International Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEAR EAST AREA RENEWAL INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Near North Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds HEARTS & HANDS OF INDIANA CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Southeast Neighborhood Development Inc ↗
- Who funds MAPLETON FALL CREEK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Englewood Community Development Corp ↗
- Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds JOHN H BONER COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds RILEY AREA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Martindale Brightwood Community Development Center ↗
- Who funds RENEW INDIANAPOLIS INC F/K/A THE LAND BANK OF INDIANAPOLIS INC ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds INTEND INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds MIDTOWN INDIANAPOLIS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN LEGAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds Shepherd Community Inc ↗
- Who funds BIG CAR MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds West Indianapolis Development Corp ↗
- Who funds CICOA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Servants at Work Inc ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORLINK INDIANAPOLIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR HOMELESSNESS INTERVENTION AND PREVENTION OF GREATER INDPLS INC ↗
- Who funds Harrison Center for the Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER INDIANAPOLIS ↗
- Who funds Indianapolis Private Industry Council ↗
- Who funds UNITED NORTH EAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BROOKSIDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Eastern Star Jewel Human Services Corporation ↗
- Who funds KEEP INDIANAPOLIS BEAUTIFUL INC ↗
- Who funds KENNEDY KING MEMORIAL INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds GROUNDWORK USA INC ↗
- Who funds INDY GATEWAY INC ↗
- Who funds Equity 1821 Inc ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING ↗
- Who funds Greater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds INSIGHT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds COBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN II INC ↗
- Who funds GROUNDED SOLUTIONS NETWORK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · National Urban League Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · Indianapolis Neighborhood Resource Center Inc · Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation · Indiana University Health Inc · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Indianapolis Neighborhood Housing Partnership Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.