Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

John G Rangos Sr Charitable Foundation U/A DTD 12/17/1987

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Education$1.9MHealth$1.6MInternational$420kScience & Tech$365kReligion$159kArts & Culture$121kHuman Services$100kEmployment$85kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k4 grants · $450k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.4M
$150,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$33M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPMC CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION$500,000
DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY$475,000
John Hopkins Medicine$400,000
CARNEGIE SCIENCE CENTER$150,000
THE MEDAL OF HONOR FOUNDATION$100,000
INTERNATIONAL ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES$100,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS DONATION$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%VET REST: $25k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of John G Rangos Sr Charitable Foundation U/A DTD 12/17/1987’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 76% of the giving stays in PA; read by stated purpose it is 66% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

John G Rangos Sr Charitable Foundation U/A DTD 12/17/1987lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.2M · 8 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
19

Total granted

$3.2M
$611k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+10%

Still filing today

75%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationInternationalHuman ServicesEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT
    5× · 2018–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +24%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $400k · revenue +6%
  • CI
    CARNEGIE INSTITUTE
    4× · 2019–2025 · $315k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $150k
  • MO
    MEDAL OF HONOR SCHOLORSHIP
    one grant, 2020 · $110k
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH
    one grant, 2018 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

3
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
4
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

5
The Pittsburgh Promise Foundation

The pittsburgh promise promotes high educational aspirations among urban youth, funds scholarships for post-secondary access, and fuels a prepared and diverse regional workforce.

Philanthropy
6
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
7
Pittsburgh Mercy Health System Inc

We, pittsburgh mercy health system (pittsburgh mercy) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. pittsburgh mercy is a member of trinity…

Health
8
Upmc

Support of subsidiary tax-exempt healthcare, education and research organizations (see schedule o)

Health
9
University of Pittsburgh

The university of pittsburgh, founded in 1787, is one of the oldest institutions of higher education in the united states and one of the nation's top public research universities. for more than two centuries, the university of pittsburgh…

Education
10
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

11
Pittsburgh Business Group On Health

An employer-led coalition that champions outcomes-based, cost-effective healthcare through education, market expertise, group purchasing, comparative data and decision support.

12
Shadyside Hospital of Pittsburgh

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carnegie Institute and the most unlike its peers is Vet R E S T. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT — $1,785,000 · EducationDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT+1 more — $15,000 · EducationUPMC CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $500,000 · OtherUPMC CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH …John Hopkins Medicine — $400,000 · OtherJohn Hopkins MedicineIndividual grant recipient — $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST VLADIMIR'S ORTHODOX CHURCH — $125,000 · OtherST VLADIMIR'S ORTHODOX CHURCHMEDAL OF HONOR SCHOLORSHIP — $110,000 · OtherMEDAL OF HONOR SCHOLORSHIPTUNNEL TO TOWERS DONATION — $100,000 · OtherTUNNEL TO TOWERS DONATIONCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH — $100,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGHUPMC — $60,000 · Other+12 more — $160,550 · Other+12 moreCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $400,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $30,000 · HealthBLOOD CANC…+1 more — $10,000 · HealthCARNEGIE INSTITUTE — $315,000 · Arts & CultureCARNEGIE …Medal Of Honor Foundation Inc — $100,000 · Arts & CultureMedal Of …+1 more — $10,000 · Arts & CultureINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC — $420,000 · InternationalINT'L ORT…PITTSBURGH HIRES VETERANS — $85,000 · EmploymentVET R E S T — $25,000 · Human Services
Education$1,800,000Other$1,705,550Health$440,000Arts & Culture$425,000International$420,000Employment$85,000Human Services$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT — $1,785,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC — $420,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $400,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCARNEGIE INSTITUTE — $315,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPITTSBURGH HIRES VETERANS — $85,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL PITTSBURGH — $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSHADYSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBoca Raton Police Athletic League — $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSYRIA SHRINERS — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT
  • Who funds INT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CARNEGIE INSTITUTE
  • Who funds Medal Of Honor Foundation Inc
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH HIRES VETERANS
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds VET R E S T
  • Who funds READING IS FUNDAMENTAL PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds SHADYSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Three Rivers Young Peoples Orchestras
  • Who funds Boca Raton Police Athletic League
  • Who funds SYRIA SHRINERS
  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization John G Rangos Sr Charitable Foundation U/A DTD 12/17/1987 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph