Skip to content

· Private foundation

John E Desmond and Janet C Desmond Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$159k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$366kYouth Development$188kHuman Services$122kEmployment$104kCommunity Improvement$67kInternational$26kEducation$9kHousing & Shelter$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
$11,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RICHFIELD SPARTAN FOUNDATION$66,500
NORMANDALE FOUNDATION$30,000
BIG IDEAS INC$17,000
CORNERHOUSE$12,000
HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATI$11,000
BANYAN COMMUNITY$8,000
MINNESOTA STATE FAIR FOUNDATION$5,000
NORTHWOOD TECHNICAL COLLEGE$4,000
SMILE NETWORK INTERNATIONAL$3,500
MIDWEST SHOWMEN'S FOUNDATION$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BIG IDEAS INC: $18k → 8%NORMANDALE FOUNDATION: $46k → 11%BIG IDEAS INC: $17k → 8%NORMANDALE FOUNDATION: $46k → 11%MINNESOTA STATE FAIR FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%BIG IDEAS INC: $17k → 8%NORMANDALE FOUNDATION: $40k → 11%MINNESOTA STATE FAIR FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%BIG IDEAS INC: $15k → 8%NORMANDALE FOUNDATION: $40k → 11%MINNESOTA STATE FAIR FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%NORMANDALE FOUNDATION: $38k → 11%NORMANDALE FOUNDATION: $35k → 11%NORMANDALE FOUNDATION: $35k → 11%NORMANDALE FOUNDATION: $30k → 11%LOVE ONE ANOTHER FKA MINNEAPOLIS RECREATION DEVELOPMENT INC: $6k → 11%CORNER HOUSE: $16k → 11%CORNER HOUSE: $16k → 11%CORNER HOUSE: $16k → 11%CORNERHOUSE: $16k → 11%CORNER HOUSE: $16k → 11%CORNER HOUSE: $15k → 11%CORNER HOUSE: $15k → 11%CORNERHOUSE: $12k → 11%HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATI: $15k → 11%HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $13k → 11%HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $13k → 11%HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATI: $11k → 11%HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATI: $11k → 11%HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $11k → 11%RICHFIELD SPARTAN FOUNDATION: $67k → 11%BANYAN COMMUNITY: $15k → 11%SPARTAN FOUNDATION: $18k → 11%BANYAN COMMUNITY: $15k → 11%RICHFIELD SPARTAN FOUNDATION: $17k → 11%BANYAN COMMUNITY: $13k → 11%SPARTAN FOUNDATION: $17k → 11%BANYAN COMMUNITY: $10k → 11%SPARTAN FOUNDATION: $17k → 11%BANYAN COMMUNITY: $10k → 11%SPARTAN FOUNDATION: $17k → 11%BANYAN COMMUNITY: $10k → 11%SPARTAN FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%BANYAN COMMUNITY: $10k → 11%SPARTAN FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%BANYAN COMMUNITY: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$985k · 14 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against -15% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$985k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
-15%

Still filing today

64%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    CORNERHOUSE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $122k · revenue +71%
  • HT
    HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $104k · revenue +125%
  • TB
    The Banyan Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $91k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • LG
    LET'S GO FISHING SCOTT COUNTY AREA
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • NS
    NORTHERN STAR COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -15%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
2
Minnesota State Bar Foundation

The minnesota state bar foundation mobilizes legal community philanthropy to achieve access to justice for all minnesotans.

Crime & Legal
3
St Cloud Downtown Alliance Foundation

Enhancing and strengthening our community and our regional core.

—
4
Minnesota State College Southeast Foundation

Minnesota state college southeast foundation assists the college in achieving excellence in technical education for employment by developing financial and community resources for students, employers, and communities within our service area.

Education
5
Northland Foundation

The northland foundation supports northeastern minnesota people and communities working toward a future where everyone feels they belong and can thrive.

Philanthropy
6
Minnesota Forest Industries Inc

To inform and educate the public about forest industries practices in minnesota.

—
7
The Minnesota Camp Fire Foundation

Ensure camp fire minnesota's strong future. with nature as the catalyst, camp fire minnesota energizes youth to discover their spark so their futures glow brighter.

Youth Development
8
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
9
Minneapolis Downtown Council

To create an extraordinary downtown minneapolis, applying the core values of leadership, collaboration, advocacy and innovation.

—
10
Minneapolis Community & Technical College Foundation

The minneapolis community & technical college foundation helps solve issues of affordability and access to higher education through funds and provides part or all of the funding to the college to develop technical college foundation…

Education
11
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
12
Minneapolis Regional Chamber Development Foundation

The mission of the minneapolis regional chamber development foundation is to offer innovative ways of reducing unemployment, improve educational opportunities for disadvantaged youth, initiate and conduct leadership development programs…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minnesota State Fair Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Big Ideas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORMANDALE FOUNDATION: $309,500 · OtherNORMANDALE FOUNDATIONSPARTAN FOUNDATION: $97,000 · OtherSPARTAN FOUNDATION+7 more: $27,500 · Other+7 moreHENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $104,000 · EducationHENNEPIN TECHNICAL CO…Richfield Spartan Foundation Inc: $83,000 · EducationRichfield Spartan Fou…+1 more: $3,000 · EducationThe Banyan Foundation: $91,000 · Community ImprovementThe Banyan Foundat…BIG IDEAS INC: $66,976 · Community ImprovementBIG IDEAS INCCORNERHOUSE: $121,500 · Crime & LegalCORNERHOUSEMINNESOTA STATE FAIR FOUNDATION: $55,000 · PhilanthropySMILE NETWORK INTERNATIONAL: $24,000 · HealthMinneapolis Recreation Development Inc Love One Another: $9,000 · Youth DevelopmentMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,000 · International
Other$434,000Education$190,000Community Improvement$157,976Crime & Legal$121,500Philanthropy$55,000Health$24,000Youth Development$9,000International$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCORNERHOUSE: $121,500 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetHENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $104,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetThe Banyan Foundation: $91,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetRichfield Spartan Foundation Inc: $83,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetBIG IDEAS INC: $66,976 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetMINNESOTA STATE FAIR FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSMILE NETWORK INTERNATIONAL: $24,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetMinneapolis Recreation Development Inc Love One Another: $9,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMIDWEST SHOWMEN'S FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetNORTHERN STAR COUNCIL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DEPOT FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CORNERHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Banyan Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Richfield Spartan Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BIG IDEAS INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA STATE FAIR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SMILE NETWORK INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Minneapolis Recreation Development Inc Love One Another ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST SHOWMEN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN STAR COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DEPOT FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John E Desmond and Janet C Desmond Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John E Desmond and Janet C Desmond Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John E Desmond and Janet C Desmond Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John E Desmond and Janet C Desmond Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John E Desmond and Janet C Desmond’s filings →

    More from the funding graph