Skip to content

· Private foundation

John E and Mary E King Family Foundation Inc C/O Sterling Fdn Mgmt

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$159k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$71k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$426kArts & Culture$405kCivil Rights$175kEducation$114kEmployment$25kHuman Services$25kCommunity Improvement$20kHealth$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $66k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $71k
$7,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER$71,000
YEAR UP UNITED$25,000
WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ART$25,000
JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES (MAKOM)$16,000
ST BRENDAN PARISH SCHOOL$7,500
WASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS$6,000
CALLEN-LORDE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$5,000
SAN MIGUEL SCHOOL INC$1,000
EASTER SEALS UCP NC & VA INC$1,000
YOUTH APOSTLES INSTITUTE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES (MAKOM): $16k → 8%JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES: $3k → 8%JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES (MAKOM): $1k → 8%JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES (MAKOM): $1k → 8%JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES: $1k → 8%JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES: $1k → 8%JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 14 repeat orgs$228k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$1.0M
$203k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+68%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER
    8× · 2018–2025 · $426k · revenue +277%
  • WT
    WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
    4× · 2022–2025 · $310k · revenue +10%
  • AC
    American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia
    3× · 2018–2021 · $75k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • JF
    JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTSgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $70k · revenue +68%
  • EF
    EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +102%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through advocacy and lobbying.

—
2
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
3
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
4
National Veterans Legal Services Program Inc

To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.

—
5
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Iowa

The foundation works to defend and promote the constitution of the united states, focusing especially on the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and 14th amendments. the foundation also works to defend and promote the constitution of the…

Civil Rights
6
American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa

The union works to advocate and advance a public policy agenda to support and protect the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of iowa. it works to maintain throughout the united states the rights of free…

—
7
Civic Works Inc

Strengthening baltimore's communities through education, skills development and community service.

Education
8
American Civil Liberties Union

The american civil liberties union of west virginia (aclu-wv) is a non-partisan, non-profit membership organization whose mission is to fulfill the promise of the bill of rights for all west virginians and expand the reach of its…

—
9
Liberty Justice Center

To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…

Crime & Legal
10
Volunteer Legal Advocates

To advocate for domestic violence victims, at-risk children, and other vulnerable individuals by providing over $22.8m in pro bono legal services, social service referrals, and on-going support; to train and support a strong network of…

Housing & Shelter
11
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
12
American Civil Liberties Union Inc

As noted in its articles of incorporation, the mission of the aclu is "to maintain and advance civil liberties, including, without limitation, the freedoms of association, press, religion and speech, and the rights to the franchise, to due…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wolf Trap Foundation for the Performing Arts; the most unlike its peers is Creative Growth Art Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER: $425,500 · Crime & LegalLEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTERWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $310,000 · Arts & CultureWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFO…JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $70,000 · Arts & CultureJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERF…American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia: $75,000 · OtherAmerican Civil Liberti…ST BRENDAN PARISH SCHOOL: $55,000 · OtherST BRENDAN PARISH SCHO…EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFE…MOUNT VERNON LADIES ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · OtherMOUNT VERNON LADIES AS…YOUTH APOSTLES INSTITUTE: $13,500 · OtherYOUTH APOSTLES INSTITU…SOME INC: $10,000 · OtherST BRENDAN SCHOOL: $10,000 · Other+6 more: $17,000 · Other+6 moreWASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $42,000 · EducationYEAR UP INC: $25,000 · EducationAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Civil RightsJEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES INC: $23,500 · Human ServicesBUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INC: $20,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT INC: $10,000 · HealthCreative Growth Art Center: $5,000 · HealthEASTER SEALS UCP NORTH CAROLINA & VIRGINIA INC: $3,000 · Health
Crime & Legal$425,500Arts & Culture$380,000Other$250,500Education$67,000Civil Rights$50,000Human Services$23,500Community Improvement$20,000Health$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER: $425,500 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $310,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Virginia: $75,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $70,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $42,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES INC: $23,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOME INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCreative Growth Art Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEASTER SEALS UCP NORTH CAROLINA & VIRGINIA INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia ↗
  • Who funds JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON SCHOOL FOR GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Creative Growth Art Center ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS UCP NORTH CAROLINA & VIRGINIA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John E and Mary E King Family Foundation Inc C/O Sterling Fdn Mgmt funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John E and Mary E King Family Foundation Inc C/O Sterling Fdn Mgmt. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to John E and Mary E King Family Foundation Inc C/O Sterling Fdn Mgmt?

Find your warmest path to John E and Mary E King Family Foundation Inc C/O Sterling Fdn Mgmt through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John E and Mary E King Family Foundation Inc C/O Sterling Fdn Mgmt’s filings →

More from the funding graph