· Private foundation
John and Ursula Kanel Charitable Foundation co Alan T Yoshitake
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 53% of John and Ursula Kanel Charitable Foundation co Alan T Yoshitake’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $160k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| California Institute of Technology | $100,000 |
| UCLA Cancer Center Foundation | $60,000 |
| Shriners Hospital for Children | $40,000 |
| Samaritan's Purse | $20,000 |
| Hawaii Community Foundation | $10,000 |
| Blind Childrens Center | $10,000 |
| Mission Viejo YMCA Golf | $6,500 |
| Triton Booster Club Girls | $6,000 |
| Friends of Wonderland | $5,000 |
| Crean Lutheran High School | $5,000 |
| Centenary United Methodist Church | $5,000 |
| Rafu Shimpo Foundation | $2,500 |
| Pasadena Humane Society | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| The Wesley School | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CICALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY5× · 2020–2024 · $455k · revenue +18%
- TJTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2021 · $96k · revenue +50%
- TBThe Blind Childrens Center Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +171%
Funded once
- HTHAWAII TAX INSTITUTE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +560%
- SASalvation Army of Southern Californone grant, 2022 · $10k
- PFPARTNERS FOR PEDIATRIC PROGRESSone grant, 2020 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
The specific purpose for which the los angeles mission college foundation has been established is to advance the college's educational and cultural goals.
The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…
A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life. we work with public school systems, establishing relationship with superintendents, principals, educators, and community partners to…
Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…
Friends of hta supports and fosters the advancement of hawaii technology academy through the solicitation of financial, human resource and community support for the school and engaging in other activities that further the organization's…
We inspire and educate young minds through engaging science-based programs and exhibits to create a meaningful impact on the communities we serve.
We are committed to breaking the cycle of poverty and creating programs that drive change. by addressing students' basic needs, including food, housing, utilities, transportation, and healthcare, we enable low-income students to enroll,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaii Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Wonderland. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Blind Childrens Center Inc ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Friends of Wonderland ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds HAWAII TAX INSTITUTE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS - MIRA CATALINA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PASADENA HUMANE ↗
- Who funds THE RAFU SHIMPO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds 1979 LEGACY CORP ↗
- Who funds THE WESLEY SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization John and Ursula Kanel Charitable Foundation co Alan T Yoshitake funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to John and Ursula Kanel Charitable Foundation co Alan T Yoshitake?
Find your warmest path to John and Ursula Kanel Charitable Foundation co Alan T Yoshitake through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.