Skip to content

· Private foundation

John & Susan Wilder Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$251k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.8MEducation$111kHuman Services$89kPhilanthropy$73kCommunity Improvement$30kHealth$21kInternational$17kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $204k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$55M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HIGHLAND PARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$150,000
CORNERSTONE CHURCH$54,307
THE SALVATION ARMY$10,300
HIGH SOARING EAGLE CENTER INC$10,300
UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC$10,000
KIDS ACROSS AMERICA$8,000
GLOSTER BAPTIST CHURCH$5,000
TEXAS RESOURCES FOUNDATION$2,060
WORLD VISION$780
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CROSSROADS CAMPUS: $4k → 14%HIGH SOARING EAGLE CENTER INC: $10k → 14%HIGH SOARING EAGLE CENTER INC: $10k → 14%CITY SQUARE: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
CA
MO
VA
AR
TN
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 14 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
14

Total granted

$2.1M
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+44%

Still filing today

36%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionPhilanthropyEducationArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HP
    HIGHLAND PARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M
  • CC
    CORNERSTONE CHURCH
    7× · 2019–2025 · $174k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $80k

Funded once

  • LC
    LIONHEART CHILDREN'S ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +165%
  • CF
    COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $23k
  • TR
    TEAM RUBICON INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Trinity Charter School

The trinity charter schools system has 11 campuses in texas. all 11 campuses work with youth who have emotional difficulties, and need active engagement in planning and guiding their own academic careers through student led credit…

Education
3
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
4
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
5
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
6
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
7
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
8
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
9
The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…

—
10
Worldatwork

To sponsor and conduct educational conferences, seminars, workshops and symposia for purposes of informing members and other interested parties on current research, legislation and practices in all phases of employee reward programs…

Membership Benefit
11
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
12
Hill Country Montessori School Inc

Provide quality education for students from pre school through middle school using the Montessori method of learning and teaching.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Crossroads Campus. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HIGHLAND PARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $1,525,000 · OtherHIGHLAND PARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCHCORNERSTONE CHURCH: $174,307 · OtherCORNERSTONE CHURCHTHE SALVATION ARMY: $80,300 · Other+17 more: $156,525 · Other+17 moreKIDS ACROSS AMERICA: $38,180 · ReligionLIONHEART CHILDREN'S ACADEMY: $25,000 · ReligionUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyHIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $45,000 · EducationHigh Soaring Eagle Center Inc: $20,300 · Human ServicesCITYSQUARE: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE CROSSROADS CAMPUS: $3,500 · Human ServicesTEAM RUBICON INC: $10,000 · Public Safety & DisasterWORLD VISION INC: $7,020 · International
Other$1,936,132Religion$63,180Philanthropy$50,000Education$45,000Human Services$28,800Public Safety & Disaster$10,000International$7,020

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetKIDS ACROSS AMERICA: $38,180 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLIONHEART CHILDREN'S ACADEMY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHigh Soaring Eagle Center Inc: $20,300 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $7,020 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCITYSQUARE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTD CLUB FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CROSSROADS CAMPUS: $3,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLSU ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE: $275 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIDS ACROSS AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds LIONHEART CHILDREN'S ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds High Soaring Eagle Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYSQUARE ↗
  • Who funds TD CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CROSSROADS CAMPUS ↗
  • Who funds LSU ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John & Susan Wilder Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John & Susan Wilder Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John & Susan Wilder’s filings →

    More from the funding graph