Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Pamela Beckert Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$144k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$222kFood & Nutrition$162kInternational$120kArts & Culture$107kHuman Services$62kCrime & Legal$47kEducation$45kPhilanthropy$32kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $98k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Planned Parenthood$38,000
Mpower Now$25,000
Alliance of Idaho$25,000
Crossroads Community Service$10,000
North Texas Food Bank$7,500
Sun Valley Writers Conference$5,800
Anti Defamation League$5,000
Uplift Education$5,000
Sun Valley Music Festival$3,000
Healthy Futures of Texas$2,500
Hunger Coalition$2,500
KERA$1,500
The Circle$1,200
Center for Reproductive Rights$1,000
Texas Tribune$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $100 → 11%LOCAL MEDIA FDN: $1k → 13%ACTIVE HEROES INC: $270 → 15%GIDEONS PROMISE: $1k → 13%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $5k → 14%METROCREST SERVICES: $17k → 14%Metrocrest Services: $3k → 14%DALLAS FURNITURE BANK: $100 → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $500 → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $150 → 14%METROCREST SERVICES: $12k → 14%METROCREST SERVICES: $10k → 14%METROCREST SERVICES: $4k → 14%METROCREST SERVICES: $1k → 14%METROCREST SERVICES: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$933k · 42 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
57

Total granted

$933k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+22%

Still filing today

69%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MN
    MPOWER NOW INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $145k · revenue +167% · 50% of their budget
  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +105%
  • AO
    ALLIANCE OF IDAHO INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $65k · revenue +236%

Funded once

  • E
    EPCF
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR EUROPEAN POLICY ANALYSIS
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -10%
  • CC
    CLUB CORP EMPLOYEE PARTNERS
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
2
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
3
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
4
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
5
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
6
Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…

Civil Rights
7
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
8
Dallas Regional Chamber

Together, with our business leaders and community partners, we will help lead the dallas region to become the best place in the united states for all people to live, work, and do business.

—
9
Dallas Bar Association

The Dallas Bar Association is a nonprofit corporation chartered by the State of Texas to protect and advance the professional interests of persons licensed to practice law in the Dallas area, to improve the relations between the Bench, the…

—
10
Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center

To engage and educate communities to prevent sexual violence and to support survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.

Human Services
11
COMMIT2DALLAS

Our mission is that by 2040, at least half of all 25 to 34 year old residents of Dallas County, irrespective of race, will earn a living wage. Together, we cultivate a collaborative educational ecosystem with school systems, higher…

Education
12
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dallas Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
67/67
Grantees still filing
49/67
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $79,765 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $46,775 · OtherSHARE OUR STRENGTHDallas Holocaust and Human Rights: $16,798 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherEPCF: $15,000 · Other+63 more: $153,819 · Other+63 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD: $228,784 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD+7 more: $13,862 · Health+7 moreMPOWER NOW INC: $145,000 · InternationalMPOWER NOW INCALLIANCE OF IDAHO INC: $65,000 · InternationalALLIANCE OF IDAHO INCSUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE INC: $35,500 · EducationUPLIFT EDUCATION: $32,150 · EducationTEXAS TRIBUNE INC: $7,000 · EducationUNITED TO LEARN: $5,515 · Education+5 more: $2,550 · EducationSUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC: $38,080 · Arts & CultureNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $13,600 · Arts & CultureDallas Museum of Art: $7,996 · Arts & CultureDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $5,100 · Arts & CultureTHE NASHER SCULPTURE CENTER: $2,837 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $35,010 · Food & NutritionBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC: $16,740 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $4,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $100 · Food & NutritionMETROCREST SERVICES: $46,173 · Human ServicesDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $5,000 · Human Services+6 more: $3,220 · Human Services
Other$328,157Health$242,646International$210,000Education$82,715Arts & Culture$69,613Food & Nutrition$55,850Human Services$54,393

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $228,784 over 7y, 61% of budgetMPOWER NOW INC: $145,000 over 9y, 50% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $79,765 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE OF IDAHO INC: $65,000 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $46,775 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMETROCREST SERVICES: $46,173 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC: $38,080 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE INC: $35,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $35,010 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUPLIFT EDUCATION: $32,150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC: $16,740 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $13,600 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR EUROPEAN POLICY ANALYSIS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $9,950 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Museum of Art: $7,996 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS TRIBUNE INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED TO LEARN: $5,515 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHY FUTURES OF TEXAS: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $5,350 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $5,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK TIE DINNER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRETINA FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTHWEST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NASHER SCULPTURE CENTER: $2,837 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $2,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALING HANDS MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG THOUGHT: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Women's Foundation: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUN VALLEY CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER PREVENTION INITIATIVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIDEONS PROMISE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Public Policy Priorities: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOCAL MEDIA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEE PESKY LEARNING CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Family Place: $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $512 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS CONTEMPORARY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSalesmanship Club of Dallas: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ↗
  • Who funds MPOWER NOW INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE OF IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds METROCREST SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds UPLIFT EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR EUROPEAN POLICY ANALYSIS ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Museum of Art ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TRIBUNE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED TO LEARN ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY FUTURES OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds THE DALLAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum ↗
  • Who funds BLACK TIE DINNER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds RETINA FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds OFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationTX25.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · The Addy Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Perot Foundation · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Make It Count Family Foundation · Todd a Williams Family Foundation · Harry Bass Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Pamela Beckert Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Pamela Beckert Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John and Pamela Beckert Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph