Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Linda Muckel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$312k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$685kArts & Culture$237kReligion$193kHealth$175kAnimals$76kInternational$51kEnvironment$33kHousing & Shelter$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $41k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$360
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TORRANCE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$175,000
COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG FOUNDATION$75,000
FAITH PARTNERSLIBERTY UNIVERSITY$41,000
HOPE CHAPEL$9,923
GATEWAY COMMUNITY CHURCH$5,000
GLORY MINISTRIES$2,500
DELTA RESCUE$1,200
SACRED HEART ELEMENTARY$1,000
BIBLE LEAGUE INTERNATIONAL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GROVELAND EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH: $25k → 14%GATEWAY COMMUNITY CHURCH: $6k → 19%FREEDOM WITHIN THE WALLS: $10k → 10%CRU: $5k → 13%WITHIN THESE WALLS: $5k → 13%SAMARITANS PURSE INTERNATIONAL RELIEF: $5k → 21%COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG FOUNDATION: $75k → 7%WITHIN THE WALLS: $5k → 8%LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $10k → 20%GROVELAND EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH: $13k → 14%GATEWAY COMMUNITY CHURCH: $5k → 19%CRU: $4k → 13%SAMARITANS PURSE INTERNATIONAL RELIEF: $4k → 21%COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG FOUNDATION: $20k → 7%GLORY MINISTRIES: $5k → 8%FAITH PARTNERSLIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $41k → 20%GROVELAND EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH: $10k → 14%SAMARITANS PURSE INTERNATIONAL RELIEF: $4k → 21%COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG FOUNDATION: $20k → 7%GLORY MINITRIES: $5k → 8%LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $20k → 20%HELPING HANDS: $5k → 14%SAMARITANS PURSE INTERNATIONAL RELIEF: $4k → 21%LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $13k → 20%GROVELAND COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS BASKET PROGRAM: $5k → 14%LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $12k → 20%GROVELAND EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH: $5k → 14%LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $11k → 20%GEFC: $5k → 14%LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $10k → 20%GROVELAND EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH: $5k → 14%FAITH PARTNERS LIBERTY U: $5k → 20%HELPING HANDS: $5k → 14%FAITH PARTNERS LIBERTY U: $4k → 20%GEFC: $5k → 14%LIBERTY GODPARENT FOUNDATION: $4k → 20%FAITH PARTNERS LIBERTY U: $4k → 20%HOPE CHAPEL: $57k → 14%HOPE CHAPEL: $51k → 14%HOPE CHAPEL: $50k → 14%HOPE CHAPEL: $10k → 14%HOPE CHAPEL HERMOSA BEACH: $59k → 14%HOPE CHAPEL HERMOSA BEACH: $55k → 14%HOPE CHAPEL HERMOSA BEACH: $51k → 14%HOPE CHAPEL HERMOSA BEACH: $51k → 14%HOPE CHAPEL HERMOSA BEACH: $50k → 14%TORRANCE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $175k → 14%SALVATION ARMY: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
AZ
NC
SC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 46 repeat orgs$254k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
16

Total granted

$1.3M
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+37%

Still filing today

39%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $216k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsReligionArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Colonial Williamsburg Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $235k · revenue +17%
  • LU
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $76k · revenue +75%
  • UR
    UNION RESCUE MISSION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $30k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • FW
    FREEDOM WITHIN THE WALLS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • GC
    GROVELAND COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS BASKET PROGRAM
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • WT
    Within These Wall Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -56% · 70% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sacramento Zoological Society

The sacramento zoo inspires appreciation, respect and a connection with wildlife and nature through education, recreation and conservation.

Animals
2
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…

—
3
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
4
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
5
Zoological Society of San Diego

San diego zoo wildlife alliance is committed to saving species worldwide by uniting our expertise in wildlife care and conservation science with our dedication to inspiring passion for nature.

Animals
6
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
7
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
8
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
9
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
10
Animal Rescue Mission

To rescue and rehabilitate dogs and cats and place them in forever homes.

Animals
11
The Trust for Public Land

The trust for public land creates parks and protects land for people, ensuring healthy, livable communities for generations to come. in the past year, we helped communities to plan for parks and conservation, fund parks and conservation,…

Environment
12
Conservation Farms & Ranches

Preserving and enhancing the habitat of wildlife, such as sandhill cranes, waterfowl, raptors, which habitat expenses are supported by agricultural activities.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canine Companions for Independence Inc; the most unlike its peers is Within These Wall Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
20/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOPE CHAPEL HERMOSA BEACH: $265,500 · OtherHOPE CHAPEL HERMOSA BEACHHOPE CHAPEL: $167,923 · OtherHOPE CHAPELGROVELAND EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH: $57,500 · OtherGROVELAND EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCHFAITH PARTNERSLIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $41,000 · Other+43 more: $346,056 · Other+43 moreColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $235,000 · Arts & CultureColonial Williams…+1 more: $1,500 · Arts & CultureTorrance Memorial Medical Center Health Care Foundation: $175,000 · HealthTorrance Memo…+1 more: $200 · HealthLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $76,000 · EducationSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $28,100 · ReligionIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $27,570 · ReligionWithin These Wall Inc: $5,000 · Religion+1 more: $1,950 · ReligionUNION RESCUE MISSION: $30,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $16,050 · Human ServicesDedication and Everlasting Love to Animals: $21,200 · AnimalsYANKEE GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE INC: $9,900 · AnimalsGOLDEN RETRIEVER CLUB OF GREATER LA RESCUE: $3,000 · AnimalsLOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $3,000 · AnimalsPet Rescue of Mercer Inc: $1,500 · Animals+1 more: $769 · Animals
Other$877,979Arts & Culture$236,500Health$175,200Education$76,000Religion$62,620Human Services$46,050Animals$39,369

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $235,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTorrance Memorial Medical Center Health Care Foundation: $175,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $76,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $30,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $28,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $27,570 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDedication and Everlasting Love to Animals: $21,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $16,050 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $13,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS OF GROVELAND: $10,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetYANKEE GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE INC: $9,900 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION: $9,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $9,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWithin These Wall Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 70% of budgetGOLDEN RETRIEVER CLUB OF GREATER LA RESCUE: $3,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL CARE FOUNDATION INC: $2,375 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCommunity Bible Study: $1,950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPet Rescue of Mercer Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPALOS VERDES PENINSULA LAND CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $769 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAIM AT MELANOMA: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Torrance Memorial Medical Center Health Care Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Dedication and Everlasting Love to Animals ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOSEMITE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS OF GROVELAND ↗
  • Who funds YANKEE GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Within These Wall Inc ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN RETRIEVER CLUB OF GREATER LA RESCUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Linda Muckel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Linda Muckel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John and Linda Muckel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph