Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Helen Murphey Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$291k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$127k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.5MHousing & Shelter$278kHealth$272kHuman Services$243kFood & Nutrition$218kArts & Culture$108kPhilanthropy$100kYouth Development$90kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $116k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $127k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Arizona Foundation$127,000
Community Food Bank$20,000
Primavera Foundation$20,000
Pima Community College Foundation$16,000
Planned Parenthood$15,000
Emerge Center for Domestic Abuse$15,000
Education Enrichment Foundation$10,000
Mobile Meals of Southern Arizona$10,000
Literacy Connects$10,000
YMCA$7,500
Arizona Theatre Company$7,500
Sister Jose Womens Shelter$7,500
Big Brothers Big Sisters$5,000
St Elizabeth of Hungry Clinic$2,500
Tucson Symphony Society$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YMCA: $8k → 15%YMCA: $8k → 15%YMCA: $8k → 15%YMCA: $8k → 15%YMCA: $8k → 15%YMCA: $8k → 15%YMCA: $8k → 15%YMCA: $8k → 15%YMCA: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 25 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
2

Total granted

$2.8M
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
-7%

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Arizona Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +109%
  • TP
    The Primavera Foundation Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $178k · revenue +54%
  • PC
    PIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $104k · revenue +395%

Funded once

  • CT
    CAREGIVER TRAINING INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -7%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Center for the Future of Arizona

Bringing arizonans together to create a stronger and brighter future for our state.

Community Improvement
3
Tempe Community Action Agency Inc

TCAA's mission is to eliminate poverty and advance equitable communities. This mission is achieved through the delivery of comprehensive human services programs designed to improve housing stability, increase food security, improve health…

Community Improvement
4
United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc

Our vision is a community where every child receives a high-quality education from birth to career, every adult has the opportunity to thrive financailly and in the workplace, and every older person can retire and age with dignity and…

Philanthropy
5
Tucson Values Teachers

To elevate the teaching profession in southern arizona by empowering and celebrating prek-12 teacher excellence through community engagement and investment.

Employment
6
Southern Arizona Leadership Council Inc

To improve greater tucson and the state of arizona by bringing together resources and leadership to enhance the economic climate and quality of life in our communities.

—
7
Impact of Southern Arizona

Impact of southern arizona is a private non-profit volunteer based organization which empowers southern arizonans with the resources required to pursue a stabilized and enhanced quality of life.

Community Improvement
8
Tucson Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce

The Tucson Metro Chamber is a membership-based business advocacy and community development organization that represents 1,500 businesses employing more than 160,000 employees in Tucson and Pima County. The Tucson Metro Chamber is committed…

—
9
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
10
Phoenix Conservatory of Music

The organization is committed to unleashing the power of music by providing high-quality music education and experiences that are affordable and accessible. its vision is to be a leader in music education with a focus on creative youth…

Arts & Culture
11
Cala Alliance

CelebracinArtstica de lasAmricas(CALA)Alliancecollaborates with artists and arts organizations to nurture artistic talent, focusing onartistsfrom the Latin American diaspora.Through innovative artist residencies, commissions, community…

Arts & Culture
12
Social Venture Partners Tucson

Svp tucson is an ever expanding community of engaged philanthropists dedicated to building the capacity, strength and impact of nonprofits in addressing social problems. we accomplish this through: thoughtful and strategic investments and…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Literacy Connects; the most unlike its peers is City Center for Collaborative Learning. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Arizona Foundation: $1,226,000 · EducationUniversity of Arizona FoundationLITERACY CONNECTS: $87,500 · EducationLITERACY CONNECTSEDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION: $47,500 · Education+1 more: $20,000 · EducationPlanned Parenthood: $155,000 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodEmerge Center for Domestic Abuse: $152,500 · OtherEmerge Center for Domestic Abus…PIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $104,000 · OtherPIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI…Community Foundation of Southern AZ: $100,000 · OtherCommunity Foundation of Souther…Big Brothers Big Sisters: $90,000 · OtherBig Brothers Big SistersHabitat for Humanity: $40,000 · OtherTHE HAVEN: $35,000 · Other+8 more: $119,871 · Other+8 moreThe Primavera Foundation Inc: $177,500 · Housing & ShelterThe Prima…Sister Jose Women's Center: $60,000 · Housing & ShelterSister Jo…Community Food Bank Inc: $157,500 · Food & NutritionMOBILE MEALS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC: $60,000 · Food & NutritionArizona Theatre Company: $62,500 · Arts & CultureTucson Symphony Society: $22,500 · Arts & CultureTUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INC: $22,500 · Arts & CultureValley of the Sun Young Men's Christian Association: $67,500 · Human ServicesTHE CHILD LANGUAGE CENTER INC: $37,500 · Youth Development
Education$1,381,000Other$796,371Housing & Shelter$237,500Food & Nutrition$217,500Arts & Culture$107,500Human Services$67,500Youth Development$37,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $1,226,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetThe Primavera Foundation Inc: $177,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc: $157,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $104,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetLITERACY CONNECTS: $87,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetValley of the Sun Young Men's Christian Association: $67,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetArizona Theatre Company: $62,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMOBILE MEALS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC: $60,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetSister Jose Women's Center: $60,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetEDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION: $47,500 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetTHE CHILD LANGUAGE CENTER INC: $37,500 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetTHE HAVEN: $35,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTucson Symphony Society: $22,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INC: $22,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCity Center for Collaborative Learning: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCAREGIVER TRAINING INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds The Primavera Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds PIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY CONNECTS ↗
  • Who funds Valley of the Sun Young Men's Christian Association ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Theatre Company ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE MEALS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC ↗
  • Who funds Sister Jose Women's Center ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD LANGUAGE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Tucson Symphony Society ↗
  • Who funds TUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INC ↗
  • Who funds City Center for Collaborative Learning ↗
  • Who funds CAREGIVER TRAINING INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ28× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Donald Pitt Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · Arizona Community Foundation · The Gordon Foundation · The Stocker Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Iverson Family Foundation · The Stonewall Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Helen Murphey Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Helen Murphey Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John and Helen Murphey Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to John and Helen Murphey Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John and Helen Murphey’s filings →

    More from the funding graph