· Public charity
The Stonewall Foundation
To support medical, cultural, educational and environmental organizations qualified as exempt under 501(c)(3), headquartered in the tucson, az area and as identified in the foundation's amended and restated articles of incorporation.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 23 grants below total $2,558,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $11,924,311 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $9,366,311 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2021
- $10k–50k13 grants · $308k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $540k
- $250k+5 grants · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ARIZONA SONORA DESERT MUSEUM | $530,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $350,000 |
| TUCSON SYMPHONY SOCIETY | $300,000 |
| ARIZONA THEATER COMPANY | $280,000 |
| ARIZONA PUBLIC MEDIA | $250,000 |
| DESERT SURVIVORS | $150,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $130,000 |
| THE HAVEN | $100,000 |
| NAMI OF SOUTEHRN ARIZONA | $100,000 |
| TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS | $60,000 |
| TUCSON GIRLS CHORUS ASSOCIATION | $35,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD BANK | $35,000 |
| TUCSON MUSEUM OF ART | $33,000 |
| REVEILLE MEN'S CHORUS | $30,000 |
| CLINICA AMISTAD | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ADARIZONA-SONORA DESERT MUSEUM4× · 2017–2021 · $620k · revenue +31%
- ATArizona Theatre Company5× · 2017–2021 · $615k · revenue +9%
- TSTucson Symphony Society5× · 2017–2021 · $498k · revenue +44%
Funded once
- THTMC HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $35k · revenue +390%
- IRISKASHITAA REFUGEE NETWORKgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +41%
- FOFRIENDS OF TUCSONS BIRTHPLACone grant, 2017 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.
The Arts Foundation mission is to advance artistic expression, civic participation, and equitable economic growth of our diverse community by supporting, promoting, and advocating for arts and culture in our region.
CORAZÓN-AZ's mission is to cultivate and foster a welcoming and safe community of Arizonans from vast faith traditions and beliefs, schools, and allied organizations; united in expanding our democracy, economic dignity, immigrant justice,…
Our mission is to lead, serve, empower and advocate for the Tucson urban American Indian community and others by providing culturally appropriate health, wellness and social services.
The Tucson Investigative Reporting Center educates and informs Southern Arizonans about the community challenges & unique culture of our borderlands through independent local journalism.
Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…
Our vision is a community where every child receives a high-quality education from birth to career, every adult has the opportunity to thrive financailly and in the workplace, and every older person can retire and age with dignity and…
Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tucson Museum of Art and Historic Block Inc and the most unlike its peers is Reveille Gay Mens Chorus. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARIZONA-SONORA DESERT MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Arizona Theatre Company ↗
- Who funds Tucson Symphony Society ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity Tucson Inc ↗
- Who funds TUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY CONNECTS ↗
- Who funds Desert Survivors Inc ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI of Southern Arizona ↗
- Who funds TUCSON BOTANICAL GARDENS ↗
- Who funds Tucson Girls Chorus Association Inc ↗
- Who funds THE HAVEN ↗
- Who funds Community Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds IMAGO DEI MIDDLE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds AMISTAD Y SALUD ↗
- Who funds REVEILLE GAY MENS CHORUS ↗
- Who funds Southern Arizona AIDS Foundation ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF TUCSON'S BIRTHPLACE ↗
- Who funds CASA DE LOS NINOS ↗
- Who funds Tucson Interfaith HIVAIDS Network ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR CREATIVE BROADCASTING ↗
- Who funds TMC HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH OUTDOOR EXPERIENCE ↗
- Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
- Who funds ISKASHITAA REFUGEE NETWORK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · Arts Foundation for Tucson and Southern Arizona · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Arizona Community Foundation · Donald Pitt Family Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · The Gordon Foundation · Jade Tree Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Stonewall Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.