· Public charity
John and Ginger Niemeyer Foundation
The John and Ginger Niemeyer Foundation is a supporting organization of the oregon community foundation (ocf).
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- $10k–50k15 grants · $543k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $398k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Linn-Benton Community College | $85,000 |
| Bethel School District | $75,000 |
| Clackamas Community College Foundation | $69,992 |
| J Bar J Youth Services | $68,200 |
| Northwest Children's Theater & School | $50,000 |
| The Family Nurturing Center | $50,000 |
| Pine Eagle School District 61 | $49,431 |
| Oregon 4-H Foundation | $48,300 |
| ScienceWorks Hands-On Museum | $40,000 |
| Friends of the Children - Central Oregon | $40,000 |
| Pendleton Children's Center | $40,000 |
| Illinois Valley 2010 Community Response Team | $40,000 |
| Arts in Education of the Gorge | $40,000 |
| Autism Family Support of Rural Clackamas County | $40,000 |
| Lane Arts Council | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $320k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 15 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $636k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HHHELPING HANDS REENTRY OUTREACH CENTERS2× · 2020–2022 · $1.0M · revenue +127%
- LCLutheran Community Services Northwest5× · 2019–2023 · $150k · revenue +66%
Oregon State University Foundation3× · 2018–2020 · $121k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- CRCOMMUNITY RESOURCE TRone grant, 2018 · $250k · revenue -99%
- SKSALEM KEIZER PUBLIC SCHOOLSone grant, 2020 · $50k
- FTFAMILY TREE RELIEF NURSERYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +194%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Partnering with parents to provide a rich, innovative, and effective home- based education that nurtures academic success and personal growth.
The family center provides affordable, high quality education for children. our community is a cooperative effort between families and center staff to raise happy, healthy and socially confident children.
Oregon child development coalition is dedicated to improving the lives of children and families by providing early childhood education, care and advocacy with unique and supportive services to enhance family growth and community success.
Cascades academy is an engaged, vibrant community that weaves challenging academics with experiential learning to inspire socially responsible individuals ready for a diverse and changing world.
To ensure children and youth in oregon have access to high quality, comprehensive services and resources to address child abuse.
Mobilizing the community to uplift children and families impacted by foster care in Oregon.
We work collectively to educate and advocate for systems that elevate the vital work of care and caregiving in its many forms within our community.
To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.
The mission of young roots oregon is to creatively help young families build healthy foundations. our multi-generational vision is to give pregnant and parenting adolescents through age 24 and their children equitable opportunities for…
The mission of oregon children's theater is to create exceptional theater experiences that transform lives. we do this by producing professional stage plays for young audiences, and through arts education classes and programs.
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
Head start & other children services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the Children-Portland and the most unlike its peers is Glide Revitalization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HELPING HANDS REENTRY OUTREACH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds Clackamas Community College Foundation ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCE TR ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OREGON AND SW WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds Lutheran Community Services Northwest ↗
- Who funds In4All ↗
- Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds PENDLETON CHILDRENS CENTER ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CONNECTED LANE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds REACH OUT AND READ INC ↗
- Who funds BETHEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds J BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE HISTORIC UNION COMMUNITY HALL ↗
- Who funds OREGON TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds GLADSTONE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OREGON MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY ↗
- Who funds SOUTH LANE FAMILY NURSERY INC ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ROGUE VALLEY CHILDREN'S RELIEF NURSERY ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST CHILDREN'S THEATER AND SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY TREE RELIEF NURSERY ↗
- Who funds Oregon 4-H Foundation ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA PACIFIC ECONOMIC DEVELOPME ↗
- Who funds SOUTH COAST BUSINESS EMPLOYMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Autism Family Support of Rural Clackamas County ↗
- Who funds ARTS IN EDUCATION OF THE GORGE ↗
- Who funds Portland YouthBuilders ↗
- Who funds Teaching Preschool Partners ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Juan Young Trust · The Collins Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Braemar Charitable Trust · JTMF Foundation · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization John and Ginger Niemeyer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Pendleton Childrens Center — 100% of income from government
- Glide Revitalization — 87% of income from government
- Columbia Pacific Economic Developme — 77% of income from government
- J Bar J Youth Services Inc — 71% of income from government
- Family Development Center — 71% of income from government
- Family Building Blocks Inc — 68% of income from government
- Center for Hope and Safety — 68% of income from government
- South Lane Family Nursery Inc — 58% of income from government
- Family Tree Relief Nursery — 57% of income from government
- Families First of Grant County Inc — 55% of income from government
- Baker Relief Nursery Inc — 50% of income from government
- Building Healthy Families — 41% of income from government
- South Coast Business Employment Corporation — 41% of income from government
- The Family Nurturing Center Rogue Valley Children's Relief Nursery — 38% of income from government
- Portland YouthBuilders — 35% of income from government
- Autism Family Support of Rural Clackamas County — 24% of income from government
- College Dreams Inc — 23% of income from government
- Helping Hands Reentry Outreach Centers — 18% of income from government
- Connected Lane County — 17% of income from government
- Friends of the Children- Central Oregon — 16% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Corvallis Inc — 16% of income from government
- Lane Arts Council — 14% of income from government
- Friends of the Historic Union Community Hall — 11% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
- Portland Workforce Alliance — 8% of income from government
- Portland Community College Foundation Inc — 5% of income from government
- Friends of the Children-Portland — 5% of income from government
- Oregon Museum of Science and Industry — 4% of income from government
- Young Mens Christian Assoc Medford dba Rv Family Ymca — 1% of income from government
- Condon Child Care Inc — 1% of income from government
- Caldera — 1% of income from government
- Scienceworks Hands-On Museum — 0% of income from government
- Bird Alliance of Oregon Inc — 0% of income from government
- Clackamas Community College Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Portland State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.