Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Elizabeth Kerrigan Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$108k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$337kReligion$136kYouth Development$27kHuman Services$12kHealth$9kRecreation & Sports$7kPhilanthropy$7kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $71k
$3,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Basic Fund$20,000
Catholic Community - Stanford$20,000
New Camaldoli Hermitage$10,874
Boston College$10,000
Marist Brothers$10,000
Golden Hearts$5,000
Figureskating in Harlem$5,000
Macalester College$5,000
Sacred Heart Schools$4,750
LEMO Foundation$3,000
Ambition Angels$3,000
Street Code Academy$3,000
LifeMoves$2,000
Peter's Place$2,000
Team Esface Community Fund$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Community Cancer Fund: $5k → 12%Larkin Street Youth Services: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
NJ
CA
UT
MO
DE
NC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$587k · 24 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
25

Total granted

$587k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+35%

Still filing today

42%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthReligionYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BASIC FUND
    7× · 2017–2024 · $150k · revenue +82%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $46k · revenue +70%
  • FS
    FIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $14k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • JS
    Jesuit School of Theology
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CANCER FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -2%
  • CJ
    CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
7
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
8
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
11
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Basic Fund; the most unlike its peers is The Journey With Jesus Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Sacred Heart School: $75,532 · OtherSacred Heart SchoolCatholic Community - Stanford: $71,475 · OtherCatholic Community - StanfordMarist Brothers: $68,500 · OtherMarist BrothersSACRED HEART SCHOOLS ATHERTON: $56,874 · OtherSACRED HEART SCHOOLS ATHERTONNew Camaldoli Hermitage: $34,208 · OtherNew Camaldoli HermitageCatholic Community at Stanford: $20,740 · OtherCatholic Community at StanfordIndividual grant recipient: $15,894 · Other+32 more: $39,829 · Other+32 moreTHE BASIC FUND: $150,000 · EducationTHE BASIC FUNDTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $46,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGEAMBITION ANGELS: $8,000 · Education+4 more: $5,555 · EducationFIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC: $13,500 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $300 · Recreation & SportsCOMMUNITY CANCER FUND: $5,000 · Human ServicesLarkin Street Youth Services: $2,093 · Human ServicesPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $6,709 · PhilanthropyFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $3,600 · Youth DevelopmentSTREETCODE ACADEMY: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTER AT OAKLAND: $1,200 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $400 · HealthTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION: $250 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $250 · Health
Other$383,052Education$209,555Recreation & Sports$13,800Human Services$7,093Philanthropy$6,709Youth Development$6,600Health$2,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BASIC FUND: $150,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $46,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC: $13,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAMBITION ANGELS: $8,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $6,709 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMACALESTER COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY CANCER FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $3,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTREETCODE ACADEMY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services: $2,093 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEMOVES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NAPA INSTITUTE: $1,493 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTER AT OAKLAND: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $305 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDYF: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACHIEVE TAHOE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOURNEY WITH JESUS FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITE TO LIGHT INC: $120 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BASIC FUND ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMBITION ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND ↗
  • Who funds MACALESTER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CANCER FUND ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds STREETCODE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
  • Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗
  • Who funds THE NAPA INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTER AT OAKLAND ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DYF ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY15.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Salesforce Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Marin Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Elizabeth Kerrigan Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Elizabeth Kerrigan Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to John and Elizabeth Kerrigan Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to John and Elizabeth Kerrigan Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John and Elizabeth Kerrigan’s filings →

More from the funding graph