Skip to content
John and Elizabeth Endicott Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

John and Elizabeth Endicott Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$347k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$625kPhilanthropy$304kEducation$195kYouth Development$106kReligion$95kHuman Services$69kEnvironment$52kInternational$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $83k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $243k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ATLANTICARE FOUNDATION$100,000
BRETT BOYER FOUNDATION$87,500
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$55,700
ST MATTHEW'S HOUSE$42,825
ST JUDES$25,000
SNIP COLLIER$15,000
FRESH START MINISTRIES$5,000
HANSEN FOUNDATION$5,000
DOWN SYNDROME CONNECTION$3,000
AFSP$2,500
STOCKTON UNIVERSITY$2,000
NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN$1,500
DTCAREORG$1,250
HERITAGE CARES FOUNDATION$850
WREATHS ACROSS AMERICA$311
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAMA'S HOUSE: $20k → 11%THE JOSLYN CENTER: $15k → 11%MAMAS HOUSE: $10k → 11%MAMA'S HOUSE: $5k → 11%YMCA OF THE DESERT: $100 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
IN
PA
NJ
CA
MD
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 15 repeat orgs$216k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
15

Total granted

$1.4M
$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+20%

Still filing today

53%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPublic BenefitEnvironmentPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BRETT BOYER FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $538k · revenue +96%
  • LD
    LIVING DESERT THE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $45k · revenue +39%
  • HF
    HANSEN FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $19k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • SU
    STOCKTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +105%
  • TT
    TRANS-MISS TURF SCHOLARS
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • BW
    Batavia Womans Club
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Camp Del Corazon Inc

Mission statement: camp del corazon is a registered 501(c)3 nonprofit organization that provides year-round experiential opportunities for children faced with the challenges of growing up and living with heart disease. we provide a…

Recreation & Sports
2
Vista Del Mar Child and Family Services

To provide comprehensive, family-centered social, educational and behavioral health services that encourage children, adolescents and their families to lead self reliant, stable and productive lives.

Human Services
3
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
4
Alliance for Childhood Diseases

To advance cures and treatment of childhood cancer and other rare diseases.

Health
5
Child Protection Center Inc

The mission of the child protection center, inc. is the prevention, intervention and treatment of child abuse. we envision a community where children are safe from abuse and free to thrive. to successfully address the issue of child abuse,…

Crime & Legal
6
Pediatric Specialty Group Inc

Pediatric specialty group, inc. (d/b/a nicklaus children's pediatric specialists ("ncps")) is a physician-directed, multi-specialty pediatric group with a regional, national, and international presence in providing pediatric-centric care…

—
7
Children's Clinics for Rehabilitative Services

The children's clinics provides a family centered comprehensive medical home to meet the special needs of children and families.

Health
8
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
9
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
10
Child Study Center

The child study center (csc) provides children with complex developmental and behavioral disabilities the highest quality diagnosis, treatment and education to help them achieve their full potential.

Education
11
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
12
Usc Arcadia Hospital Foundation

Mission statement the mission of usc arcadia hospital foundation educates and inspires the community to generously support quality medical care at usc arcadia hospital.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Botanical Garden Inc; the most unlike its peers is Snip Collier Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ATLANTICARE FOUNDATION: $301,050 · OtherATLANTICARE FOUNDATIONSTOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $118,500 · OtherSTOCKTON UNIVERSITYST JUDES: $89,590 · OtherST JUDESBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $87,250 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBSTOCKTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherSTOCKTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONMEDICAL MINISTRIES OF THE AMERICAS: $45,000 · OtherMEDICAL MINISTRIES OF THE AMERICASIndividual grant recipient: $31,000 · Other+16 more: $93,361 · Other+16 moreTHE BRETT BOYER FOUNDATION INC: $537,820 · HealthTHE BRETT BOYER FOUNDATION INCTEAM TRACE INC: $55,000 · HealthTEAM TRACE INC+3 more: $13,000 · HealthLIVING DESERT THE: $45,000 · EnvironmentNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $6,500 · EnvironmentMAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22: $35,000 · Human ServicesCove Communities Senior Association DBA The Joslyn Center: $15,325 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $42,825 · Housing & ShelterBatavia Womans Club: $25,000 · Public BenefitWreaths Across America: $10,504 · Public BenefitHANSEN FOUNDATION INC: $18,900 · Philanthropy
Other$815,751Health$605,820Environment$51,500Human Services$50,425Housing & Shelter$42,825Public Benefit$35,504Philanthropy$18,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BRETT BOYER FOUNDATION INC: $537,820 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetTEAM TRACE INC: $55,000 over 2y, 41% of budgetSTOCKTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLIVING DESERT THE: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $42,825 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22: $35,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHANSEN FOUNDATION INC: $18,900 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCove Communities Senior Association DBA The Joslyn Center: $15,325 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWreaths Across America: $10,504 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME CONNECTION OF THE BAY AREA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOOLS FOR TOMORROW INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT RECREATION FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BRETT BOYER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM TRACE INC ↗
  • Who funds STOCKTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIVING DESERT THE ↗
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22 ↗
  • Who funds Batavia Womans Club ↗
  • Who funds HANSEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Cove Communities Senior Association DBA The Joslyn Center ↗
  • Who funds SNIP Collier Inc ↗
  • Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWN SYNDROME CONNECTION OF THE BAY AREA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
  • Who funds DTCare ↗
  • Who funds TOOLS FOR TOMORROW INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT ↗
  • Who funds DESERT RECREATION FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bighorn Golf Club Cha…Houston Family Founda…Anderson Childrens Fo…Inland Empire Communi…Arthur J Gallagher Fo…The Pfizer Foundation…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Bighorn Golf Club Charities IncCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc · Houston Family Foundation · Anderson Childrens Foundation · Inland Empire Community Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Elizabeth Endicott Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Elizabeth Endicott Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • Hansen Foundation Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John and Elizabeth Endicott’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home