Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Becky Wright Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$201k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$73k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$225kEducation$163kPhilanthropy$85kHuman Services$81kYouth Development$57kArts & Culture$35kFood & Nutrition$32kReligion$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $123k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION$72,846
BETHANY COLLEGE$50,000
CENTRAL OHIO YOUTH FOR CHRIST$20,000
MID-OHIO FOOD COLLECTIVE$10,000
WEST VIRGINIA NORTHERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$10,000
CHARITY NEWSIES$10,000
FLYING HORSE FARMS$3,000
SALVATION ARMY - ROCHESTER PA$2,500
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$2,000
FRANKLIN COUNTY CHILDREN'S SERVICES$2,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,000
CITIZENS FOR HUMANE ACTION INC$1,500
MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION$1,500
VFW POST 6327$1,454
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FAITH IN ACTION OF THE RIVER CITIES: $500 → 19%CHARITY NEWSIES: $10k → 15%CHARITY NEWSIES: $5k → 15%CHARITY NEWSIES: $5k → 15%CHARITY NEWSIES: $3k → 15%CHARITY NEWSIES: $2k → 15%WOMEN'S CENTER OF BEAVER COUNTY: $1k → 10%WOMEN'S CENTER OF BEAVER COUNTY: $700 → 10%ADOPTION CONNECTION PA: $200 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IA
OH
PA
CO
WV
VA
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$449k · 31 repeat orgs$209k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
20

Total granted

$449k
$153k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+31%

Still filing today

58%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsInternationalArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CENTRAL OHIO YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $48k · revenue +50%
  • MF
    Mid-Ohio Foodbank
    5× · 2018–2024 · $30k · revenue +49%
  • ON
    OHIO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $25k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -31%
  • OG
    OIL GAS & INDUSTRIAL HISTORICAL AS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +22%
  • NC
    NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
2
Greater Cleveland Volunteers

Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…

Philanthropy
3
Community Shelter Board

The community shelter board is ending homelessness by creating collaborations, innovating solutions, and investing in quality programs.

—
4
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
5
Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio

Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio serves and empowers people through God's love in their times of vulnerability. We do so through a full range of local services that engage the community in building solidarity.

Human Services
6
Toledo Northwestern Ohio Food Bank

To enable other community organizations to end hunger. we strive to maximize community resources by effectively obtaining and distributing food through a food collection and distribution system.

Food & Nutrition
7
Montgomery County Community Foundation

The mission of the Montgomery County Community Foundation (MCCF) is to provide leadership in Montgomery County by directing sustainable financial resources that strengthen our community and improve the quality of life for current and…

Philanthropy
8
Central Pennsylvania Blood Bank

The central pennsylvania blood bank (cpbb) is a community based blood program committed to providing a quality blood supply, responsive to community needs, in a cost effective manner. cpbb works to promote, secure, and coordinate 100% of…

Health
9
Wayne County Humane Society

Finding committed, permanent homes for companion animals in our community; measurably reducing companion animal overpopulation; educating and promoting humane values.

Animals
10
Catholic Charities Counseling & Adoption Services of the Diocese of Erie Inc

Provide adoption, counseling services, and refugee assistance

—
11
Community Foundation of Lorain County

The community foundation responds to the changing needs of the community by making grants to local nonprofit organizations, awarding scholarships to help local students, working together with donors to build community endowment and…

Philanthropy
12
Columbus Zoological Park Association

Empowering people. saving wildlife.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio; the most unlike its peers is Mustard Seed Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
23/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED METHODIST FOUNDATION OF: $184,544 · OtherUNITED METHODIST FOUNDATION OFMid-Ohio Foodbank: $29,500 · OtherMid-Ohio FoodbankRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $23,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEWEST VIRGINIA NORTHERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $12,000 · OtherFLYING HORSE FARMS: $15,000 · Other+36 more: $87,104 · Other+36 moreWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSIT…BETHANY COLLEGE: $50,000 · EducationBETHANY COLLEGE+1 more: $500 · EducationAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $72,846 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ENDO…COLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $6,520 · PhilanthropyCOLUMBUS FOUN…MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $6,000 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS F…CENTRAL OHIO YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC: $48,000 · Youth DevelopmentOHIO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION INC: $24,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $9,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER OF BEAVER COUNTY: $1,700 · Human Services+2 more: $700 · Human ServicesOIL GAS & INDUSTRIAL HISTORICAL AS INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureHONOR FLIGHT COLUMBUS INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureADVOCATES SAVING ADOPTABLE PETS INC: $24,500 · AnimalsBEAVER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $6,750 · Animals
Other$351,148Education$150,500Philanthropy$85,366Youth Development$48,000Human Services$35,900Arts & Culture$35,000Animals$31,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $72,846 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY COLLEGE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL OHIO YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC: $48,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetOIL GAS & INDUSTRIAL HISTORICAL AS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank: $29,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION INC: $24,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetADVOCATES SAVING ADOPTABLE PETS INC: $24,500 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetFLYING HORSE FARMS: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF CENTRAL OHIO: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEAVER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $6,750 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $6,520 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHONOR FLIGHT COLUMBUS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER IN MIDLAND PA: $4,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCITIZENS FOR HUMANE ACTION INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBeaver Falls Youth Network Inc: $1,900 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER OF BEAVER COUNTY: $1,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHURCH ARMY USA INC: $1,550 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPINE VALLEY BIBLE CONFERENCE: $1,550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL DBA PATH FROM POVERTY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetVeterans of Foreign Wars Post 6327: $1,454 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE MUSTARD SEED PROJECT: $1,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF BEAVER COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITERACY PITTSBURGH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAdoption Connection PA: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BETHANY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL OHIO YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC ↗
  • Who funds OIL GAS & INDUSTRIAL HISTORICAL AS INC ↗
  • Who funds Mid-Ohio Foodbank ↗
  • Who funds OHIO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATES SAVING ADOPTABLE PETS INC ↗
  • Who funds FLYING HORSE FARMS ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF CENTRAL OHIO ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds BEAVER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HONOR FLIGHT COLUMBUS INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER IN MIDLAND PA ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS FOR HUMANE ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Beaver Falls Youth Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER OF BEAVER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH ARMY USA INC ↗
  • Who funds PINE VALLEY BIBLE CONFERENCE ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL DBA PATH FROM POVERTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA21.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Beaver County Foundation · Nisource Charitable Foundation · United Way of Beaver County · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Columbus Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Becky Wright Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Becky Wright Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John and Becky Wright Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to John and Becky Wright Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John and Becky Wright’s filings →

    More from the funding graph