Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Alice Lloyd Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$112k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$315kInternational$128kEducation$64kRecreation & Sports$43kFood & Nutrition$38kHousing & Shelter$24kArts & Culture$20kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$52,500
Individual grant recipient$17,500
BOOKS & BREAKFAST$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,750
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPO$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
NIJFON (NORTHN IL JUSTICE NEIGHBORS$5,000
PILSON FOOD PANTRY$5,000
DOOR COUNTY FOOD PANTRY COALITION$1,500
DOOR COUNTY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP$1,000
HELP OF DOOR COUNTY INC$1,000
Individual grant recipient$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $285k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $65k → 14%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $65k → 14%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $65k → 14%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50k → 14%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $40k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$871k · 16 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$871k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+338%

Still filing today

44%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHousing & ShelterHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $285k · revenue +28%
  • BA
    BOOKS AND BREAKFAST
    7× · 2019–2025 · $36k · revenue +266%
  • GN
    GOOD NEWS PARTNERS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS NE ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • CO
    Childrens Oncology Services Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
2
Door County Land Trust Inc

The door county land trust is a local, non-governmental non-profit organization whose mission is to preserve door county's exceptional lands and waters forever.

Environment
3
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
4
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
5
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
6
Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Michigan Inc

Goodwill provides exceptional opportunities for people facing employment barriers.

—
7
Residential Opportunities Inc

We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.

Human Services
8
Community Housing Initiatives Inc

The mission of community housing initiatives, inc. is to leverage and maximize opportunities for vibrant and resilient communities.

Housing & Shelter
9
Cap Services Inc

Cap services, inc.'s mission is to transform people and communities to advance social and economic justice.

Human Services
10
Great Lakes Community Action Partnership

The mission of great lakes community action partnership is to create partnerships and opportunites to help individuals, families and communities thrive.

Human Services
11
Community Development Corporation of Long Island Inc

Cdcli invests in the housing and economic aspirations of individuals and families by providing solutions that foster and maintain vibrant, equitable, and sustainable communities.

Community Improvement
12
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shore Community Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Door County Housing Partnership Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $247,315 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $127,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRIMLAND SERVICES: $30,000 · OtherRIMLAND SERVICESIndividual grant recipient: $22,750 · OtherRIMLAND: $20,000 · OtherGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPO: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $19,000 · Other+8 more: $18,250 · OtherSHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $285,000 · Human ServicesSHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INCBOOKS AND BREAKFAST: $36,000 · EducationCOLLEGE BOUND OPPORTUNITIES: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationGOOD NEWS PARTNERS: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterDOOR COUNTY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC: $3,500 · Housing & ShelterGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $10,000 · Food & NutritionHELP OF DOOR COUNTY INC: $4,000 · HealthChildrens Oncology Services Inc: $1,000 · Health
Other$524,815Human Services$285,000Education$41,500Housing & Shelter$23,500Food & Nutrition$10,000Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $285,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetBOOKS AND BREAKFAST: $36,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetGOOD NEWS PARTNERS: $20,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE BOUND OPPORTUNITIES: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHELP OF DOOR COUNTY INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDOOR COUNTY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC: $3,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetChildrens Oncology Services Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGENESYS WORKS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BOOKS AND BREAKFAST ↗
  • Who funds GOOD NEWS PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE BOUND OPPORTUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds HELP OF DOOR COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds DOOR COUNTY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds Childrens Oncology Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds GENESYS WORKS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Alice Lloyd Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Alice Lloyd Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John and Alice Lloyd Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John and Alice Lloyd Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John and Alice Lloyd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph