Skip to content
Joe and Jessie Crump Fund Xxxxx3000 at a glance

· Private foundation

Joe and Jessie Crump Fund Xxxxx3000

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$4.2MReligion$4.1MArts & Culture$900kRecreation & Sports$585kHuman Services$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $155k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $736k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.7M
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$53M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EPISCOPAL THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF$1,355,000
KELSEY RESEARCH FOUNDATION$350,000
CAMP SUMMIT INC$200,000
FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE$115,552
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$100,000
ALL SAINTS HEALTH FOUNDATION$100,000
W I COOK FOUNDATION INC$70,340
SCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN$50,000
MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY$50,000
HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$50,000
MIDLAND CHILDREN'S REHABILITATION$35,000
NEURO ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION$30,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS TEXAS INC$25,000
HELPING EVERYONE REACH OUTSTANDING$20,000
GUIDE DOGS OF TEXAS INC$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GUIDE DOGS OF TEXAS INC: $20k → 16%MANEGAIT: $15k → 5%VARIETY - THE CHILDRENS CHARITY OF TEXAS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 19 repeat orgs$305k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
3

Total granted

$12M
$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
0%

Still filing today

79%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $160k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KR
    Kelsey Research Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +61%
  • WC
    WI Cook Foundation Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $895k · revenue +105%
  • CS
    CAMP SUMMIT INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $660k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • BS
    BAYLOR SCOTT AND WHITE ALL SAINTS HEALTH
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -25%
  • MG
    Mane Gait
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
2
Cook Children's Physician Network

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
3
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
4
Dell Children's Medical Group

Rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. Our Catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
5
Dana-Farber Children's Hospital Cancer Care Inc

To oversee, coordinate and support the Pediatric Oncology Programs at Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc.

Health
6
Camp for All Foundation

Camp For All transforms the world for children and adults with challenging illnesses, disabilities, or special needs.

Youth Development
7
Child Study Center

The child study center (csc) provides children with complex developmental and behavioral disabilities the highest quality diagnosis, treatment and education to help them achieve their full potential.

Education
8
Cook Children's Health Care System

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
9
Children's Cancer Fund of Dallas inc

Children's cancer fund champions kids in their fight against cancer through strategic investments in research and care in north texas.

Health
10
Texas Children's Hospital

Texas children's hospital, headquartered in houston, texas, is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and…

Health
11
Texas Children's

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education, and research.

Health
12
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Variety the Children's Charity of Texas; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EPISCOPAL THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF: $5,441,600 · OtherEPISCOPAL THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OFFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $1,015,552 · OtherFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCEIndividual grant recipient: $287,000 · OtherUNT HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER: $280,000 · Other+3 more: $170,000 · OtherKelsey Research Foundation: $1,450,250 · HealthKelsey Research FoundationWI Cook Foundation Inc: $895,340 · HealthWI Cook Foundation IncAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $636,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $529,744 · HealthCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONAll Saints Health Foundation: $300,000 · HealthAll Saints Health FoundationMIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $200,000 · HealthTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $171,793 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $160,000 · Health+7 more: $300,000 · Health+7 moreCAMP SUMMIT INC: $660,000 · Youth DevelopmentSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $135,000 · Recreation & SportsRISE ADVENTURES INC: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsGuide Dogs of Texas Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesMane Gait: $15,000 · Human ServicesVARIETY THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF TEXAS: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$7,194,152Health$4,643,627Youth Development$660,000Recreation & Sports$155,000Human Services$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKelsey Research Foundation: $1,450,250 over 6y, 11% of budgetWI Cook Foundation Inc: $895,340 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP SUMMIT INC: $660,000 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $636,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $529,744 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAll Saints Health Foundation: $300,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetMIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $200,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $171,793 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $160,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $135,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCANCER CARE SERVICES: $100,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetNEURO ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS OF GREATER HOUSTON INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRISE ADVENTURES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFORTIS THERAPY CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetMane Gait: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL (: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVARIETY THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF TEXAS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…W B and Ellen Gordon …Thomas M Helen McKee …Community Foundation …Paul E Andrews Jr Fou…The Jordan Spieth Fam…Dallas Stars Foundati…Ken W Davis FoundationGil and Dody Weaver F…The Rees-Jones Founda…United Way of Tarrant…The Moody Foundation
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX20.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · W B and Ellen Gordon Stuart Trust Xxxxx1009 · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation · The Jordan Spieth Family Foundation · Dallas Stars Foundation Inc · Ken W Davis Foundation · Gil and Dody Weaver Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · United Way of Tarrant County · The Moody Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joe and Jessie Crump Fund Xxxxx3000 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joe and Jessie Crump Fund Xxxxx3000. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joe and Jessie Crump Fund Xxxxx3000’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home