Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jocson Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$379kInternational$24kEducation$5kHuman Services$5k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPTIME OUTREACH$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PEOPLE LOVING NASHVILLE: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
CA
VA
TN
HI
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$294k · 7 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$294k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+40%

Still filing today

43%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionInternationalEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UPTIME OUTREACH
    3× · 2019–2024 · $32k · revenue +34%
  • IB
    ISLAND BREEZE MINISTRIES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $26k · revenue +60%
  • WH
    World Help
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • EF
    ESSENTIAL FAITH PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2020 · $75k · 79% of their budget
  • SP
    ST PAULS MB CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • BG
    BOYS GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Evangelism Partners International
Religion
2
Upreach Ministry International Inc
—
3
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
4
Faith Speaks World Outreach

World outreach

Religion
5
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
6
Message to All Nations Man

To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost

Human Services
7
Be Hope International
Religion
8
New Heart World Ministries
Religion
9
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
10
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
11
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
12
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids Around the World Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hope International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE HILLS FELLOWSHIP: $155,005 · OtherTHE HILLS FELLOWSHIPNORTH ORANGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $60,500 · OtherNORTH ORANGE CHRISTIAN CHURCHISLAND BREEZE MINISTRIES: $26,300 · OtherISLAND BREEZE MINISTRIESST PAULS MB CHURCH: $11,573 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB: $10,000 · Other+2 more: $8,200 · OtherESSENTIAL FAITH PROJECT INC: $75,000 · ReligionESSENTIAL FAITH PROJECT INCUPTIME OUTREACH: $32,000 · ReligionUPTIME OUTREACH+1 more: $2,300 · ReligionHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 · InternationalCoLink: $10,000 · InternationalBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $5,000 · EducationPEOPLE LOVING NASHVILLE: $5,000 · Human ServicesKIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC: $1,500 · Youth Development
Other$271,578Religion$109,300International$20,000Education$5,000Human Services$5,000Youth Development$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetESSENTIAL FAITH PROJECT INC: $75,000 over 1y, 79% of budgetUPTIME OUTREACH: $32,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetISLAND BREEZE MINISTRIES: $26,300 over 2y, 12% of budgetCoLink: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE LOVING NASHVILLE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWorld Help: $2,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ESSENTIAL FAITH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds UPTIME OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND BREEZE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CoLink ↗
  • Who funds BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE LOVING NASHVILLE ↗
  • Who funds World Help ↗
  • Who funds KIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jocson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jocson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jocson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph