Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jkms Williams Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$215k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$66k
Largest
01What you fund
0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$304kHealth$98kPublic Safety & Disaster$77kYouth Development$67kCivil Rights$61kCrime & Legal$55kEducation$7kInternational$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $146k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $66k
$31,250
Median grant
4
States reached
$821k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BARNERT TEMPLE$66,100
NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE$43,334
PUBLICOLOR$33,334
UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM$31,250
Individual grant recipient$20,360
PACER CENTER$18,000
CALLEN-LORDE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$1,800
NKENGE FOUNDATION INC$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATION: $2k → 4%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $63k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $7k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$752k · 16 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
13

Total granted

$752k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+92%

Still filing today

50%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    4× · 2019–2022 · $77k · revenue +39%
  • PI
    PUBLICOLOR INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $67k · revenue +19%
  • NA
    NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE
    4× · 2020–2025 · $55k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • WU
    WORLD UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE
    one grant, 2017 · $18k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • UF
    UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM EISNER CAMP
    one grant, 2023 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
8
The Foundation for Aids Research

Amfar is dedicated to ending the global aids epidemic through innovative research. (see schedule o)

Health
9
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
10
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
11
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
12
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Roots & Wings Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Daughters of Miriam Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BARNERT MEMORIAL TEMPLE — $205,760 · OtherBARNERT MEMORIAL TEMPLEUNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM — $89,250 · OtherUNION FOR REFORM JUDAISMIndividual grant recipient — $83,160 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE WORLD UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM LTD — $38,160 · OtherTHE WORLD UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM LTDNAZ — $21,000 · OtherWORLD UNION FOR PROGRESSIVE — $18,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $17,600 · Other+14 more — $47,045 · Other+14 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $76,900 · Human ServicesAmerican Na…+1 more — $1,800 · Human ServicesPUBLICOLOR INC — $67,034 · EducationPUBLICOLO…PACER CENTER INC — $57,000 · Civil RightsNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE — $54,834 · Crime & LegalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $14,300 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT INC — $7,400 · HealthBERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC — $1,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION — $1,000 · HealthAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $3,760 · International
Other$519,975Human Services$78,700Education$67,034Civil Rights$57,000Crime & Legal$54,834Health$23,700International$3,760

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $76,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLICOLOR INC — $67,034 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetPACER CENTER INC — $57,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE — $54,834 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $14,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT INC — $7,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSOLUTION PROJECT — $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $3,760 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATION — $1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDAUGHTERS OF MIRIAM FOUNDATION INC — $1,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK — $1,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREWSTER LITTLE LEAGUE INC — $200 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds PUBLICOLOR INC
  • Who funds PACER CENTER INC
  • Who funds NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT INC
  • Who funds THE CONSOLUTION PROJECT
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC
  • Who funds ROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DAUGHTERS OF MIRIAM FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK
  • Who funds BERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BREWSTER LITTLE LEAGUE INC
  • Who funds THE CAMERON KRAVITT FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jkms Williams Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jkms Williams Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Jkms Williams Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph