Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jkf Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$144k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$220kHousing & Shelter$42kHealth$32kRecreation & Sports$30kReligion$13kYouth Development$9kAnimals$8kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $114k
$7,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$938k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NUEVA GENERACION$33,658
MT MERCY UNIVERSITY$20,000
OPEN HEARTLAND$20,000
WINONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
GREATER CEDAR RAPIDS OPEN$10,000
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$7,000
REGINA FOUNDATION$5,000
SHELTER HOUSE IOWA CITY$5,000
WILLIS DADY HOMELESS SERVICES$5,000
NORWAY BASEBALL ASSOCIATION$3,000
CRITTER CRUSADERS OF CEDAR RAPIDS$3,000
WATKINS ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION$2,000
PACC911 CHUCK WAGGIN$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HUMANE BORDERS: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$415k · 15 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$415k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-12%
+35%

Still filing today

60%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WINONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2024 · $65k · revenue +13%
  • OK
    OUR KIDS DBA OPEN HEARTLAND
    5× · 2020–2024 · $44k · revenue ×17
  • WD
    WILLIS DADY EMERGENCY SHELTER INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $21k · revenue +168%

Funded once

  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1Dgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +35%
  • SU
    STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -30%
  • CH
    CR HALL OF FAME - GREATER CR COMMUN
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brett Greenwood Foundation

The mission of the Foundation is to provide scholarships to support student athletes at the University of Iowa who are "walk on" athletes. The Mission of the Foundation is also to provide funds to the University of Iowa Hospital & Clinics…

Philanthropy
2
Iowa West Foundation
—
3
Iowa State University Foundation

Aligning donor passion and generosity to advance iowa state university's land grant ideals.

Education
4
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
5
Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc

The mission of gundersen lutheran medical foundation, inc. is to improve the lives of patients and our larger community through medical education, research, outreach, and the philanthropic support of gundersen health system.

Health
6
Iowa Rugby Collective Foundation
Recreation & Sports
7
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
8
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
9
Northern Illinois University Foundation

The niu foundation's mission is to energize and connect the private sector with the niu community to secure and steward resources that support the future and growth of niu.

Education
10
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
11
Mid-Iowa Health Foundation
Religion
12
Iowa Donor Network

Working together to transform lives through the gift of organ and tissue donation.

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Olympics Iowa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Nueva Generacion. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
5/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NUEVA GENERACION: $88,258 · OtherNUEVA GENERACIONMT MERCY UNIVERSITY: $49,875 · OtherMT MERCY UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $38,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSHELTER HOUSE IOWA CITY: $21,250 · OtherSHELTER HOUSE IOWA CITYWILLIS DADY EMERGENCY SHELTER INC: $21,000 · OtherWILLIS DADY EMERGENCY SHELTER INCPIMA MNTHLY MTG RELIGIOUS SOCIETY FRNDS: $12,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB: $9,000 · Other+5 more: $13,000 · OtherWINONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $65,000 · EducationWINONA STATE UNIVERSI…REGINA FOUNDATION: $12,000 · EducationREGINA FOUNDATIONSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationSTATE UNIVERSITY OF I…OUR KIDS DBA OPEN HEARTLAND: $44,000 · HealthOUR KIDS DBA OPEN H…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $22,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOU…BREAKTHROUGH T1D: $10,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1DGREATER CEDAR RAPIDS OPEN INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyCritter Crusaders of Cedar Rapids Inc: $8,000 · AnimalsSPECIAL OLYMPICS IOWA INC: $2,750 · Recreation & SportsPROSPECT MEADOWS INC: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsHUMANE BORDERS INC: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$252,383Education$82,000Health$76,000Philanthropy$15,000Animals$8,000Recreation & Sports$4,750Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNUEVA GENERACION: $88,258 over 6y, 44% of budgetWINONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetOUR KIDS DBA OPEN HEARTLAND: $44,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $22,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIS DADY EMERGENCY SHELTER INC: $21,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER CEDAR RAPIDS OPEN INC: $15,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetREGINA FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCritter Crusaders of Cedar Rapids Inc: $8,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS IOWA INC: $2,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROSPECT MEADOWS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NUEVA GENERACION ↗
  • Who funds WINONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OUR KIDS DBA OPEN HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WILLIS DADY EMERGENCY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CEDAR RAPIDS OPEN INC ↗
  • Who funds REGINA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds Critter Crusaders of Cedar Rapids Inc ↗
  • Who funds STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS IOWA INC ↗
  • Who funds PROSPECT MEADOWS INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE BORDERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

GreenState Credit UnionIA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: GreenState Credit Union · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jkf Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jkf Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jkf’s filings →

    More from the funding graph