Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jjctmfoundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$91k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$408kHuman Services$76kPublic Safety & Disaster$24kReligion$24kInternational$23kEmployment$18kYouth Development$12kArts & Culture$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $60k
$6,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$193k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY$20,000
MICHAEL J FOX FNDTN FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH$10,000
MAYO CLINIC$10,000
CHILDRENS MERCY HOSPITAL WICHITA CLINIC$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES KANSAS CITY$10,000
KANSAS MENNONITE DISASTER SERVICE$6,000
SAFEHOME OF JOHNSON COUNTY$6,000
HIGGINS BROTHERS SURGICENTER FOR HOPE LLC$6,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$4,000
SEDAN HOSPITAL$3,000
ARC OF THE OZARKS$2,000
UNITY BAPTIST CHURCH$1,500
DON BOSCO CENTERS$1,500
INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%PATHWAYS ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC: $3k → 15%SAFEHOME OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $6k → 5%PATHWAYS ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC: $1k → 15%SAFEHOME OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $1k → 5%PATHWAYS ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC: $1k → 15%DON BOSCO CENTERS: $2k → 15%PATHWAYS ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC: $1k → 15%PATHWAYS ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
CA
CO
MO
KS
SC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$488k · 20 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$488k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+37%

Still filing today

45%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $78k · revenue +578%
  • AO
    ARC OF THE OZARKS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +148%
  • HB
    HIGGINS BROTHERS SURGICENTER FOR HOPE LLC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $17k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • A NEW LEAF INC
    one grant, 2023 · $18k · revenue -20%
  • CC
    CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • LO
    LONGWALK OKLAHOMA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ability Kc

Our mission is to build brighter futures for children and adults with disabilities by providing comprehensive medical, therapeutic, educational, and vocational services.

—
2
Kansas City Care Clinic

The mission of kc care health center is to promote health and wellness by providing quality care, access, research and education to the underserved and all people in our community.

—
3
Kansas City Hospice Inc

To bring expert care, peace of mind, comfort, guidance and hope to people who are affected by serious illness or by grief.

Human Services
4
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
5
Healthcore Clinic Inc

The mission of healthcore clinic, inc is to provide quality family healthcare through improved access and a heightened and unrelenting focus on education and prevention.

Health
6
Mental Health Center of East Central Kansas

To provide dynamic, culturally-sensitive, high quality behavioral healthcare to residents of chase, coffey, greenwood, lyon, morris, osage and wabaunsee counties in the most effective, caring and efficient manner.

Health
7
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
8
Heartland Medical Clinic Inc

Heartland offers high-quality, affordable, behavior ally-enhanced primary care to all community members regardless of income or insurance status. heartland is dedicated to practicing holistic, integrated health care in a model that focuses…

Health
9
Developmental Services of Northwest Kansas Inc

Dsnwk is committed to providing quality community-based services and support to adults and children with developmental disabilites from northwest kansas, regardless of the level of their disabilites.

Human Services
10
Resource Center for Independent Living Inc

The organization is committed to working with individuals, families, and communities to promote independent living and individual choice to persons with disabilities.

Human Services
11
Hope Family Care Center Llc

Hope family care center's mission is to honor god by establishing and operating a health clinic that provides compassionate, high-quality, whole-person care to individuals and families in east kansas city who have had the hardest time…

Health
12
Mercy Health Southwest Missourikansas Communities

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safehome Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jewel Ball. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT DEPT: $120,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT DEPTCHILDRENS MERCY HOSPITAL WICHITA CLINIC: $91,600 · OtherCHILDRENS MERCY HOSPITAL WICHITA CLINICSALVATION ARMY: $40,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYKANSAS MENNONITE DISASTER SERVICE INC: $24,100 · OtherKANSAS MENNONITE DISASTER SERVICE INCARC OF THE OZARKS: $18,500 · OtherA NEW LEAF INC: $17,854 · OtherHIGGINS BROTHERS SURGICENTER FOR HOPE LLC: $17,000 · Other+15 more: $56,900 · Other+15 moreMAYO CLINIC: $80,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $78,050 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR …Ronald McDonald House Charities of Kansas City Inc: $16,000 · HealthRonald McDonald House Charities o…+1 more: $5,000 · HealthWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHOME INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesPathways Adult Learning Center Inc: $6,500 · Human ServicesTHE DON BOSCO CENTERS: $1,500 · Human ServicesINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $5,500 · InternationalJEWEL BALL: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$385,954Health$179,050Human Services$26,000International$5,500Arts & Culture$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $78,050 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetARC OF THE OZARKS: $18,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetA NEW LEAF INC: $17,854 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHIGGINS BROTHERS SURGICENTER FOR HOPE LLC: $17,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Kansas City Inc: $16,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAFEHOME INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPathways Adult Learning Center Inc: $6,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $5,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DON BOSCO CENTERS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Kansas City Inc: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE FUND FOR CHILDREN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds ARC OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds A NEW LEAF INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGGINS BROTHERS SURGICENTER FOR HOPE LLC ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Kansas City Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Pathways Adult Learning Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DON BOSCO CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWEL BALL ↗
  • Who funds LOVE FUND FOR CHILDREN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jjctmfoundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jjctmfoundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jjctmfoundation’s filings →

More from the funding graph