Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jill Heather Goldberg Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$76kEnvironment$71kFood & Nutrition$47kAnimals$29kInternational$23kCivil Rights$17kHuman Services$11kEducation$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$550k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSE OF HOPE$4,000
TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK$4,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$3,605
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$3,000
NATIONAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL$2,500
MANNA FOOD BANK$2,061
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$2,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$1,545
YMCA OF THE TREASURE COAST$1,500
FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES$1,239
WORLD WILDLIFE FEDERATION$1,030
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE TREASURE COAST$1,000
BIG DOG RESCUE$1,000
TREASURE COAST WILDLIFE CENTER$1,000
ASPCA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NATIONAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL: $4k → 17%TREASURE COAST FOOD BABK: $5k → 13%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4k → 7%NATIONAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL: $3k → 17%FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA: $5k → 11%TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK: $5k → 13%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4k → 7%NATIONAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL: $3k → 17%TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK: $5k → 13%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4k → 7%NATIONAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL: $3k → 17%TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK: $4k → 13%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4k → 7%NATIONAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL: $3k → 17%TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK: $4k → 13%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4k → 7%NATIONAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL: $3k → 17%TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK: $4k → 13%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4k → 7%NATIONAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL: $3k → 17%TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK: $4k → 13%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3k → 7%NATIONAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL: $3k → 17%TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK: $4k → 13%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3k → 7%NATIONAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL: $3k → 17%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3k → 7%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $4k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $4k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $3k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $3k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $3k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $3k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $3k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $3k → 17%HOUSE OF HOPE: $4k → 10%HOUSE OF HOPE: $4k → 10%HOUSE OF HOPE: $4k → 10%HOUSE OF HOPE: $4k → 10%HOUSE OF HOPE: $3k → 10%HOUSE OF HOPE: $3k → 10%HOUSE OF HOPE: $3k → 10%HOUSE OF HOPE: $3k → 10%HOUSE OF HOPE: $3k → 10%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $3k → 17%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $3k → 17%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $2k → 17%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CA
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Jill Heather Goldberg Charitable Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Jill Heather Goldberg Charitable Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$238k · 21 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +98% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
3

Total granted

$238k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+4%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsFood & NutritionEnvironmentInternationalCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +202%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +41%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • FS
    FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +4%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $500
  • ES
    ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES COUNCIL INC
    one grant, 2021 · $300 · revenue -5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
4
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
5
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
6
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
7
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
8
Florida Conservation Group Inc

Mission is to seek protection of land and water resources through restoration and conservation; and conducting education and outreach on the ecological and economic importance of natural lands. we protect land from development and protect…

Environment
9
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
10
For the Fishes

To address, educate, coordinate, and enhance enforcement capacity to end teh trade in coral reef wildlife for household and other small display aquariums. our supply and demand side strategies are directed locally and globally to…

Animals
11
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
12
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
17/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOUSE OF HOPE: $31,000 · OtherHOUSE OF HOPETHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $30,205 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $29,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODWORLD WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $9,030 · OtherWORLD WILDLIFE FEDERATIONHIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER: $8,300 · OtherHIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTERTREASURE COAST WILDLIFE CENTER: $8,000 · OtherTREASURE COAST WILDLIFE CENTERMOLLY'S HOUSE INC: $7,510 · OtherMOLLY'S HOUSE INC+8 more: $8,893 · Other+8 moreTREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC: $34,900 · Food & NutritionTREASURE COAST FOOD…MANNA FOOD BANK INC: $7,961 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD BANK INCFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $4,500 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SOUTH FLORI…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $27,700 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESO…FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES INC: $3,639 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF T…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,800 · InternationalMEDECINS …UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,312 · InternationalUNITED ST…THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $9,000 · AnimalsBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $6,500 · AnimalsEquine Rescue and Adoption Foundation Inc: $3,500 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE TREASURE COAST INC: $1,000 · AnimalsSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $17,045 · Crime & LegalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,250 · HealthENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $1,300 · Philanthropy
Other$131,938Food & Nutrition$47,361Environment$31,339International$23,112Animals$20,000Crime & Legal$17,045Health$5,250Philanthropy$1,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC: $34,900 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $30,205 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $27,700 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $17,045 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $7,961 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMOLLY'S HOUSE INC: $7,510 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES INC: $3,639 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEquine Rescue and Adoption Foundation Inc: $3,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $2,312 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,162 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE TREASURE COAST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES COUNCIL INC: $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds MOLLY'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES INC ↗
  • Who funds Equine Rescue and Adoption Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE TREASURE COAST INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES COUNCIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jill Heather Goldberg Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jill Heather Goldberg Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jill Heather Goldberg’s filings →

More from the funding graph