Skip to content

· Public charity

Jews United for Justice Inc

Jews united for justice advances economic, racial, and social justice in the baltimore-washington region by educating and mobilizing our local jewish communities to action.

$958k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$247k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Civil Rights$3.3MReligion$466kCommunity Improvement$359kEducation$57kPublic Benefit$40kPhilanthropy$35kCrime & Legal$31kHuman Services$28k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$82,400
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RELIGIOUS ACTION CENTER$247,200
BEND THE ARC$234,000
CAROLINA JEWS FOR JUSTICE$82,400
DETROIT JEWS FOR JUSTICE$82,400
JEWISH COMMUNITY ACTION$78,000
JEWISH COUNCIL ON URBAN AFFAIRS$78,000
JEWISH ALLIANCE FOR LAW AND SOCIAL ACTION$78,000
JEWS FOR RACIAL AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE COMMUNITY INC$78,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DC ACTION FOR CHILDREN: $80k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
CA
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 13 repeat orgs$611k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$3.6M
$611k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+40%

Still filing today

69%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitReligionArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CJ
    CAROLINA JEWS FOR JUSTICE GOLDSTEIN
    6× · 2020–2025 · $466k · revenue +15% · 36% of their budget
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY ACTION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $436k · revenue +34%
  • JA
    JEWISH ALLIANCE FOR LAW AND SOCIAL ACTION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $242k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • WF
    WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $270k · revenue +412%
  • FP
    FUSION PARTNERSHIP INC
    one grant, 2019 · $102k · revenue -58%
  • DA
    DC ACTION FOR CHILDREN TODAY DC ACTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $80k · revenue ×32
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Coalition for Immigrant Justice Northwest

The jewish coalition builds a jewish voice in the pacific northwest advancing immigrant justice and domestic policy, following the leadership of impacted community.

Human Services
2
Jews for Racial and Economic Justice Action Inc

Jews For Racial & Economic Justice Action (JFREJ Action or JFREJ) is the home for Jewish New Yorkers organizing with our neighbors and allies to transform New York from a playground for the wealthy few into a real democracy for all of us.…

—
3
Justice Action Center

Justice Action Center JAC pilots an innovative model that advances the rights of immigrant communities by connecting cutting-edge impact litigation and compelling narrative and communications content. The purpose of JAC is to advance the…

Civil Rights
4
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
5
Jews United for Justice Inc

Jews united for justice advances economic, racial, and social justice in the baltimore-washington region by educating and mobilizing our local jewish communities to action.

Religion
6
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
7
Jews of Color Initiative

The Jews of Color Initiatives mission is to advance racial equity in the U.S. Jewish community by centering the leadership of Jews of Color and ensuring that our communities and institutions reflect the multiracial reality of the Jewish…

Civil Rights
8
Jewish Center for Justice

Founded in 2017, the Jewish Center for Justice (JCJ) is a distinguished social justice, education, and leadership development platform that meets each individual where they are in their journey to inspire change. JCJ's mission is to…

Human Services
9
Jewish Community Relations Bureau Inc

JCRB/AJC is the Jewish community advocate for combating antisemitism and pursuing justice.

Civil Rights
10
Philadelphia Area Jobs With Justice

Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.

Employment
11
Jewish Voters Unite Inc

The jewish voters unite's mission is to educate and mobilize jewish communities to participate in every election and make their voices heard at the polls.

Religion
12
Jobs With Justice Education Fund

The organization serves as a coalition of labor organizations, community groups, faith-based organizations, and student groups dedicated to protecting the rights of working people. To this end, the corporation shall engage in organizing…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Join for Justice Inc; the most unlike its peers is Carolina Jews for Justice Lawson. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM: $715,097 · OtherUNION FOR REFORM JUDAISMCONGREGATION T CHIYAH: $269,860 · OtherCONGREGATION T CHIYAHJEWS UNITED FOR JUSTICE CAMPAIGN FUND: $110,500 · OtherJEWS UNITED FOR JUSTICE CAMPAIGN FU…DC ACTION FOR CHILDREN TODAY DC ACT: $80,000 · OtherDC ACTION FOR CHILDREN TODAY DC ACT+5 more: $151,288 · Other+5 moreJEWISH COMMUNITY ACTION: $436,420 · Civil RightsJEWISH COMMUNITY ACTIONWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC: $270,291 · Civil RightsWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION I…JEWS FOR RACIAL & ECONOMIC JUSTICE: $241,685 · Civil RightsJEWS FOR RACIAL & ECONOMIC JUST…Detroit Jews for Justice: $195,960 · Civil RightsDetroit Jews for Justice+2 more: $39,588 · Civil RightsCAROLINA JEWS FOR JUSTICE GOLDSTEIN: $465,820 · ReligionCAROLINA JEWS …JOIN FOR JUSTICE INC: $74,500 · ReligionJOIN FOR JUSTI…BEND THE ARC JEWISH ACTION INC: $394,800 · Public BenefitBEND THE A…CENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC: $15,000 · Public BenefitJewish Council on Urban Affairs: $241,685 · Community ImprovementJewish Co…FUSION PARTNERSHIP INC: $102,254 · Community ImprovementFUSION PA…FAITH IN ACTION NETWORK: $15,000 · Community ImprovementJEWISH ALLIANCE FOR LAW AND SOCIAL ACTION INC: $241,685 · Arts & CultureBEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE: $218,257 · Philanthropy
Other$1,326,745Civil Rights$1,183,944Religion$540,320Public Benefit$409,800Community Improvement$358,939Arts & Culture$241,685Philanthropy$218,257

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAROLINA JEWS FOR JUSTICE GOLDSTEIN: $465,820 over 6y, 36% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY ACTION: $436,420 over 6y, 9.8% of budgetBEND THE ARC JEWISH ACTION INC: $394,800 over 2y, 20% of budgetWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC: $270,291 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetJewish Council on Urban Affairs: $241,685 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetJEWS FOR RACIAL & ECONOMIC JUSTICE: $241,685 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetJEWISH ALLIANCE FOR LAW AND SOCIAL ACTION INC: $241,685 over 5y, 6.2% of budgetBEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE: $218,257 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetDetroit Jews for Justice: $195,960 over 2y, 32% of budgetFUSION PARTNERSHIP INC: $102,254 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetJOIN FOR JUSTICE INC: $74,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetAdvocates for Justice and Education: $30,800 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetPAVE INC DBA PARENTS AMPLIFYING VOICES IN EDUCATION: $29,750 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc: $28,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $27,738 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMANY LANGUAGES ONE VOICE: $24,588 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSLIM ANTI-RACISM COLLABORATIVE: $15,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION NETWORK: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Proteus Fund IncMA21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Proteus Fund Inc · Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Tides Center · Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation · The Nathan Cummings Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jews United for Justice Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jews United for Justice Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Jewish Alliance for Law and Social Action Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Fusion Partnership Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jews United for Justice’s filings →

More from the funding graph