Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Jewish Kids Group Foundation Inc

Jewish Kids Groups is an independent network of Jewish supplementary schools that educate and inspire children-in a way that feels like summer camp-engendering positive Jewish learning, identity, and friendships.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$62k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Religion$799kPhilanthropy$200kCommunity Improvement$117kScience & Tech$62k
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 18 grants below total $977,880 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,168,247 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $190,367 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $132k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $846k
$62,192
Median grant
9
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Temple Ohabei Shalom$62,192
Temple Judea$62,192
Shomrei Torah Synagogue- Hamakom$62,192
Santa Monica Temple Association- Beth Shir Shalom$62,192
Congregation Beth El of the Oranges and Maplewood Inc$62,192
Temple Kol Ami Emanu-El$62,192
Congregation Beth Shalom$62,192
Congregation Anshai Torah$62,192
Congregation Har Hasham$62,192
Congregation Rodeph Shalom$62,192
Adat Ari El$62,192
Temple Shalom of Newton$62,192
The San Leandro Hebrew Congregation$50,000
Temple Shalom$50,000
Temple B'nai Abraham$47,192
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Temple Ohabei Shalom: $62k → 7%Temple Shalom of Newton: $62k → 8%Congregation Rodeph Shalom: $62k → 22%The San Leandro Hebrew Congregation: $50k → 10%Adat Ari El: $62k → 14%Congregation Anshai Torah: $62k → 5%Congregation B'nai Emunah: $22k → 15%Temple Shalom: $50k → 10%Temple Kol Ami Emanu-El: $62k → 13%Temple Sinai of North Dade: $47k → 15%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $200k → 13%Congregation Har Hasham: $62k → 12%Congregation Beth Shalom: $62k → 14%Congregation Beth El of the Oranges and Maplewood Inc: $62k → 16%First Hebrew Congregation of Oakland: $15k → 10%Santa Monica Temple Association- Beth Shir Shalom: $62k → 14%Temple Judea: $62k → 15%Temple B'nai Abraham: $47k → 16%Shomrei Torah Synagogue- Hamakom: $62k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HAMAKOM — $62,192 · OtherHAMAKOMCONGREGATION BETH EL — $62,192 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ELTEMPLE SHALOM OF NEWTON — $62,192 · OtherTEMPLE SHALOM OF NEWTONSANTA MONICA TEMPLE ASSOCIATION CONGREGATION BETH SHOLOM — $62,192 · OtherSANTA MONICA TEMPLE ASSOCIATION CONGREGATION BETH SHOLOMTEMPLE JUDEA — $62,192 · OtherTEMPLE JUDEACONGREGATION ANSHAI TORAH — $62,192 · OtherCONGREGATION ANSHAI TORAHADAT ARI EL — $62,192 · OtherADAT ARI ELCONGREGATION BETH SHALOM — $62,192 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH SHALOMRODEPH SHALOM CONGREGATION — $62,192 · OtherRODEPH SHALOM CONGREGATIONTEMPLE OHABEI SHALOM — $62,192 · OtherTEMPLE OHABEI SHALOMBOULDER JEWISH FELLOWSHIP INC — $62,192 · OtherBOULDER JEWISH FELLOWSHIP INCTemple Kol Ami Emanu-El — $62,192 · OtherTemple Kol Ami Emanu-ElTEMPLE SHALOM INC — $50,000 · OtherTHE SAN LEANDRO HEBREW CONGREGATION — $50,000 · OtherTEMPLE SINAI OF NORTH DADE INC — $47,192 · OtherTEMPLE BNAI ABRAHAM — $47,192 · Other+2 more — $37,192 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC — $200,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION O…
Other$977,880Philanthropy$200,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC — $200,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jewish Kids Group Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph