Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Jewish Federation of Tulsa

The mission of the JEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA is to preserve and enhance jewish life and well-being in eastern oklahoma, israel, and the entire world.

$646k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$1.3MReligion$800kYouth Development$592kHealth$444kPublic Benefit$336kEducation$319kInternational$218kHuman Services$162kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 16 grants below total $581,331 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $645,839 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $64,508 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $163k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $401k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ZARROW POINTE$124,830
B'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION -$92,500
CONGREGATION B'NAI EMUNAH$65,480
JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA$59,271
TEMPLE ISRAEL$58,760
OKLAHOMA B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL$38,000
SB 1671 OKLAHOMA HOLOCAUST$20,610
TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$15,230
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC$15,230
THE US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$15,230
BEIS MIDRASH OF QUEENS$15,230
B'NAI ISRAEL$13,900
TULSA DAY CENTER$10,000
MIZEL JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL$9,440
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DVIS: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
MA
RI
MD
DC
OK
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Jewish Federation of Tulsa’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Jewish Federation of Tulsalessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.8% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.7M · 13 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

$2.7M
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+39%

Still filing today

85%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    B'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $585k · revenue +28%
  • TJ
    TULSA JEWISH COMMUNITY RETIREMENT AND HEALTH CARE CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $555k · revenue +73%
  • FLO & MORRIS MIZEL JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $246k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SHERWIN MILLER MUSEUM OF JEWISH ART
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
  • TULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +39%
  • NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATESgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +54%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

4
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
5
Yivo Institute for Jewish Research Inc

Yivo's mission is to study the thousand-year history of jewish life in eastern europe and russia in all its aspects: language, history, religion, folkways and material culture. yivo's archive and library preserves a significant collection…

Religion
6
Greater Miami Hillel Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

7
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
8
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
9
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
10
Jewish Federation of Tulsa

The mission of the jewish federation of tulsa is to preserve and enhance jewish life and well-being in eastern oklahoma, israel, and the entire world. this mission is being addressed by pursuing charitable, humanitarian, cultural,…

Philanthropy
11
Yeshiva University High Schools

The yeshiva university high schools has as its educational mission to teach and perpetuate the values of torah and secular studies. see schedule o.

Education
12
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Sherwin Miller Museum of Jewish Art and the most unlike its peers is Sb 1671 Oklahoma Holocaust Legislation Coalition Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Local History MuseumsUnited Way AffiliatesCommunity FoundationsJewish Community Organizati…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%4%<5yr13%0%5–10yr17%0%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr14%35%35–55yr19%44%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%1%<5yr13%0%5–10yr17%0%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr14%26%35–55yr19%63%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
13%
2,509/19,392

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TULSA JEWISH COMMUNITY RETIREMENT AND HEALTH CARE CENTER INC — $554,969 · OtherTULSA JEWISH COMMUNITY RETIREMENT AND HEALTH CA…TEMPLE ISRAEL — $469,112 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAELTULSA CONGREGATION BNAI EMUNAH — $437,331 · OtherTULSA CONGREGATION BNAI EMUNAHB'NAI B'RITH HILLEL FOUNDATION — $171,250 · OtherB'NAI B'RITH HILLEL FOUNDATIONBeis Midrash of Queens — $60,840 · Other+10 more — $100,544 · Other+10 moreTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $1,178,471 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERIC…TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $155,150 · PhilanthropyTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $125,000 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM+1 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropyB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION — $585,141 · Youth DevelopmentB'NAI B'RITH YO…FLO & MORRIS MIZEL JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL — $245,535 · EducationBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY — $53,230 · EducationSB 1671 Oklahoma Holocaust Legislation Coalition Foundation — $20,610 · EducationThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $25,510 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC — $15,230 · Arts & CultureTULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $10,250 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES — $10,000 · Arts & CultureTULSA DAY CENTER INC — $56,360 · Housing & ShelterMAYO CLINIC — $15,130 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Health
Other$1,794,046Philanthropy$1,468,621Youth Development$585,141Education$319,375Arts & Culture$60,990Housing & Shelter$56,360Health$20,130

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $1,178,471 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION — $585,141 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetTULSA JEWISH COMMUNITY RETIREMENT AND HEALTH CARE CENTER INC — $554,969 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetFLO & MORRIS MIZEL JEWISH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL — $245,535 over 8y, 11% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH HILLEL FOUNDATION — $171,250 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $155,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBeis Midrash of Queens — $60,840 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTULSA DAY CENTER INC — $56,360 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY — $53,230 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $25,510 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC — $15,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC — $15,230 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $15,230 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $15,130 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHERWIN MILLER MUSEUM OF JEWISH ART — $13,150 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY — $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $10,250 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP TULSA INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJHPIEGO CORPORATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-CITY COLLECTIVE INC — $7,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family FoundationOK19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee · Coretz Family Foundation · Zarrow Families Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · One Gas Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jewish Federation of Tulsa funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Jhpiego Corporation65% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Intervention Services15% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation11% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc9% of income from government
  • Brandeis University9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph