Skip to content
Jesse T & Jodie E King Foundation Kathryn King Coleman President at a glance

· Private foundation

Jesse T & Jodie E King Foundation Kathryn King Coleman President

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$650kReligion$197kHuman Services$48kYouth Development$30kEducation$20kFood & Nutrition$16kHealth$12kPhilanthropy$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$231k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASTERWORKS SINGERS$5,000
SANTA FE DESERT CHORALE$2,900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER: $10k → 16%CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER: $10k → 16%HOLLY HALL: $3k → 16%KIDS' MEALS: $10k → 16%KIDS' MEALS: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$825k · 8 repeat orgs$159k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
14

Total granted

$825k
$159k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-11%
+36%

Still filing today

63%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    INTERNATIONAL FOLK ART ALLIANCE INC DBA IFAM
    5× · 2017–2023 · $595k · revenue -11%
  • SL
    ST LUKE'S UNITED METHODIST CHRUCH
    4× · 2017–2023 · $175k
  • CC
    Christian Community Service Center Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SETTLEMENT CLUB
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +6%
  • TG
    The Georgetown Project
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS - ARTS INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
2
Collaborative for Children

The mission of Collaborative for Children is to meaningfully improve the quality of early childhood education and care for Greater Houston's children through those most influential in their lives.

Human Services
3
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
4
Hollywood Food Coalition

Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…

—
5
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
6
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
7
Greater Albuquerque Chamber of Commerce

The greater albuquerque chamber of commerce works every day to make our community a place where businesses can grow and prosper, where people want to raise their families and where tourists want to visit. as the voice of business since…

—
8
Central Houston Civic Improvement Inc

Central houston civic improvement lnc.'s mission is to ensure the continued vitality and to support development of downtown and the central city that is critical to the continued health and growth of houston.

Community Improvement
9
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
10
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
11
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
12
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Fe Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is United Way for Greater Austin. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL FOLK ART ALLIANCE INC DBA IFAM: $595,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL FOLK ART ALLIANCE INC DBA IFAM+1 more: $7,500 · Arts & CultureST LUKE'S UNITED METHODIST CHRUCH: $175,000 · OtherST LUKE'S UNITED METHODIST CHR…RIVE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherRIVE UNIVERSITYTHE HOLY FAITH CHURCH OF SANTA FE: $20,000 · OtherTHE HOLY FAITH CHURCH OF SANTA…MASTERWORKS SINGERS: $10,050 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Other+7 more: $28,650 · Other+7 moreTHE SETTLEMENT CLUB: $25,000 · HealthThe Georgetown Project: $25,000 · HealthChristian Community Service Center Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesKIDS' MEALS INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesHolly Hall: $2,500 · Human ServicesNEW MEXICO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS - ARTS INSTITUTE: $25,000 · EducationUNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN: $5,000 · PhilanthropySANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · PhilanthropyHermann Park Conservancy: $5,000 · Environment
Arts & Culture$602,500Other$263,700Health$50,000Human Services$33,500Education$25,000Philanthropy$7,500Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL FOLK ART ALLIANCE INC DBA IFAM: $595,000 over 5y, 8.1% of budgetTHE SETTLEMENT CLUB: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Georgetown Project: $25,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS - ARTS INSTITUTE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetChristian Community Service Center Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKIDS' MEALS INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA FE DESERT CHORALE: $7,900 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHermann Park Conservancy: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHolly Hall: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAustin Wildlife Rescue: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way WorldwideShell USA Company Fou…American Endowment Fo…The Blackbaud Giving …Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
United Way WorldwideVA12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Worldwide · Shell USA Company Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jesse T & Jodie E King Foundation Kathryn King Coleman President funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jesse T & Jodie E King Foundation Kathryn King Coleman President. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jesse T & Jodie E King Foundation Kathryn King Coleman President?

    Find your warmest path to Jesse T & Jodie E King Foundation Kathryn King Coleman President through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jesse T & Jodie E King Foundation Kathryn King Coleman President’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home