Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jes Edwards Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.2M
Granted FY2026still arriving
27
Grants FY2026still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$1.4MReligion$1.3MHealth$715kArts & Culture$418kAnimals$377kYouth Development$315kInternational$240kFood & Nutrition$175kOther$0
02FY2026 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $395k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $791k
$30,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
APOLLO SUPPORT & RESCUE$100,000
CANCER CARE SERVICE$100,000
MISSION INDIA$100,000
LIFE HOUSE CHRISTIAN BAPTIST$100,000
TEXANS ON MISSION$100,000
CEDAR CREEK VETERANS FOUNDATION$76,000
THE INDEPENDENCE FUND$60,000
CONCERNED CITIZENS OF JACK COUNTY$55,000
UNBOUND NOW$50,000
ONE SAFE PLACE$50,000
RECOVERY RESOURCE COUNCIL$40,000
CAL FARLEY'S$40,000
HOPE LOCAL$30,000
MERCY SHIPS$30,000
HOPE FARM INC$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–26, $730k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CONCERNED CITIZENS OF JACK COUNTY INC: $55k → 16%ADDY'S HOPE ADOPTION AGENCY: $50k → 18%CONCERNED CITIZENS OF JACK COUNTY: $55k → 16%ADDY'S HOPE ADOPTION AGENCY: $20k → 18%CONCERNED CITIZENS OF JACK COUNTY INC: $45k → 16%CONCERNED CITIZENS OF JACK COUNTY INC: $37k → 16%CONCERNED CITIZENS OF JACK COUNTY: $33k → 16%CONCERNED CITIZENS OF JACK COUNTY INC: $30k → 16%JONATHAN'S PLACE: $30k → 14%CONCERNED CITIZENS OF JACK COUNTY: $20k → 16%HOPE FARM INC: $30k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $15k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $25k → 11%HOPE FARM INC: $10k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $20k → 11%HOPE FARM INC: $10k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $20k → 11%MHMR VISIONS: $50k → 11%MHMR VISIONS: $50k → 11%MHMR VISIONS: $40k → 11%THE PARENTING CENTER: $15k → 11%THE PARENTING CENTER: $15k → 11%THE PARENTING CENTER: $15k → 11%THE PARENTING CENTER: $15k → 11%THE PARENTING CENTER: $15k → 11%MHMR VISIONS: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NM
NC
OK
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Jes Edwards Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 78% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 73%.

Jes Edwards Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.2M · 44 repeat orgs$730k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2026, 22 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
16

Total granted

$6.2M
$527k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+18%

Still filing today

66%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $204k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesArts & CultureReligionPublic BenefitInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    APOLLO SUPPORT & RESCUE INC
    7× · 2020–2026 · $355k · revenue +36%
  • RR
    Recovery Resource Council
    7× · 2020–2026 · $280k · revenue +67%
  • CC
    CONCERNED CITIZENS OF JACK CO INC
    7× · 2020–2026 · $275k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • TO
    TEXAS ON MISSION
    one grant, 2025 · $100k
  • UH
    UNT HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $75k
  • SG
    SLAVIC GOSPEL ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
UnBound North Texas

Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.

—
2
Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center

To engage and educate communities to prevent sexual violence and to support survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.

Human Services
3
Texas Forensic Nurse Examiners - Forensic Center of Excellence

Through a coordinated community response, the forensic center empowers victims, promotes healing and creates innovative and comprehensive solutions to fill gaps in victim services.

—
4
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
5
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
6
Guardianship Services Inc

Guardianship services, inc. (gsi) answers the call to protect tarrant county's vulnerable adults from abuse, neglect and exploitation with services ranging from guardianship to money management, victim advocacy and financial literacy…

Human Services
7
Union Gospel Mission of Tarrant County

A local united christian organization and ministry dedicated to providing love, hope, respect and a new beginning for the homeless, offering a holistic care program that leads to true lasting healing.

—
8
Good News Foundation of Texas
Philanthropy
9
Hospice of East Texas

Hospice of east texas seeks to enhance the quality of life for individuals and families dealing with life-limiting illness and to assist bereaved family members by providing comprehensive, coordinated care and support.

—
10
The Retreat Home for Children

Our mission is to show the love of christ to each and every child and family towhom we serve and beyond. we do this by creating a culture where the needs of children,families, and staff are seen and met in creative and innovative ways.

Crime & Legal
11
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
12
His Story Coaching and Counseling

Christian coaching, counseling, assessment and consulting services to the communities of Tarrant County, Texas.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Recovery Resource Council; the most unlike its peers is Concerned Citizens of Jack Co Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/35
Grantees still filing
28/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISSION INDIA: $643,000 · OtherMISSION INDIATEXAS BAPTIST MEN INC: $510,000 · OtherTEXAS BAPTIST MEN INCRecovery Resource Council: $280,000 · OtherRecovery Resource CouncilTHE WARM PLACE: $275,500 · OtherTHE WARM PLACECAL FARLEY'S: $185,000 · OtherUNBOUND: $160,000 · OtherLIFE HOUSE CHRISTIAN BAPTIST CHURCH: $150,000 · OtherCANCER CARE SERVICES: $170,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY: $150,000 · Other+36 more: $1,805,500 · Other+36 moreCONCERNED CITIZENS OF JACK CO INC: $275,000 · Human ServicesCONCERNED CIT…MHMR VISIONS DBA MHMR FOUNDATION: $150,000 · Human ServicesMHMR VISIONS …ADDYS HOPE SOCIAL SERVICES: $90,000 · Human ServicesADDYS HOPE SO…ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $82,500 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE DO…SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $80,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHAVEN OF …THE PARENTING CENTER: $75,000 · Human ServicesTHE PARENTING…HOPE FARM INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesHOPE FARM INCKID NET FOUNDATION JONATHANS PLACE: $30,000 · Human ServicesCEDAR CREEK VETERANS FOUNDATION: $244,000 · Public BenefitThe Independence Fund Inc: $236,000 · Public BenefitFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY: $232,500 · Arts & CultureFOR LOVE & ART: $75,000 · Arts & CultureSINACA STUDIOS - SCHOOL OF GLASS AND GALLERY: $75,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SANTA FE OPERA: $30,000 · Arts & CultureART TOOTH: $30,000 · Arts & CultureAPOLLO SUPPORT & RESCUE INC: $355,000 · AnimalsMercy Ships International: $210,000 · InternationalGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $50,000 · InternationalUNTHSC FOUNDATION: $245,000 · Education+1 more: $3,500 · Education
Other$4,329,000Human Services$832,500Public Benefit$480,000Arts & Culture$442,500Animals$355,000International$260,000Education$248,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAPOLLO SUPPORT & RESCUE INC: $355,000 over 7y, 6.9% of budgetRecovery Resource Council: $280,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCONCERNED CITIZENS OF JACK CO INC: $275,000 over 7y, 7.9% of budgetUNTHSC FOUNDATION: $245,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetCEDAR CREEK VETERANS FOUNDATION: $244,000 over 6y, 73% of budgetThe Independence Fund Inc: $236,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY: $232,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetMercy Ships International: $210,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER CARE SERVICES: $170,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetMHMR VISIONS DBA MHMR FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY: $150,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetUNBOUND NOW: $130,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $115,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetFIRST FRUITS MINISTRY INC: $110,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetADDYS HOPE SOCIAL SERVICES: $90,000 over 3y, 8.3% of budgetASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $82,500 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $80,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGLADYS JOHNSON RITCHIE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $80,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetTHE PARENTING CENTER: $75,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetFOR LOVE & ART: $75,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetSINACA STUDIOS - SCHOOL OF GLASS AND GALLERY: $75,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetHOPE LOCAL: $70,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUP WITH DOWN INC: $50,000 over 1y, 56% of budgetJordan Elizabeth Harris Foundation: $50,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetHOPE FARM INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCAMP FIRE FIRST TEXAS: $45,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SANTA FE OPERA: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetART TOOTH: $30,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetKID NET FOUNDATION JONATHANS PLACE: $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCUISINE FOR HEALING: $25,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds APOLLO SUPPORT & RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Recovery Resource Council ↗
  • Who funds CONCERNED CITIZENS OF JACK CO INC ↗
  • Who funds UNTHSC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR CREEK VETERANS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Independence Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds CANCER CARE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MHMR VISIONS DBA MHMR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds UNBOUND NOW ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST FRUITS MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds ADDYS HOPE SOCIAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds GLADYS JOHNSON RITCHIE PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds THE PARENTING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FOR LOVE & ART ↗
  • Who funds SINACA STUDIOS - SCHOOL OF GLASS AND GALLERY ↗
  • Who funds HOPE LOCAL ↗
  • Who funds Safe City Commission ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds UP WITH DOWN INC ↗
  • Who funds Jordan Elizabeth Harris Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation IncTX32.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Morris Foundation · R4 Foundation · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Rainwater Charitable Foundation · Amon G Carter-Star Tele Emply Fund · Amon G Carter Foundation · America's Charities · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jes Edwards Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jes Edwards Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jes Edwards’ filings →

    More from the funding graph