Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jerry & Muriel Caven Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$161k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$231kInternational$76kHuman Services$61kEducation$26kYouth Development$23kCivil Rights$4kArts & Culture$2kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $93k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$15,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$994k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONE CHALLENGE$54,621
EVANGELISM RESOURCES$25,000
BETHESDA MINISTRIES$19,985
IDAHO LEARNING CENTER$18,380
FUN IN THE SON MINISTRIES (CAMP TABLE ROCK)$15,000
GLOBAL CATALYTIC NETWORK$14,400
ACE DEVELOPMENT FUND$5,000
ANSWERS IN GENESIS$5,000
FOREIGN MISSION FOUNDATION$2,850
LOVE INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $500 → 14%JEM FRIENDS: $3k → 8%JEM FRIENDS: $500 → 8%FAMILY POLICY ALLIANCE: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
OR
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Jerry & Muriel Caven Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Jerry & Muriel Caven Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$305k · 14 repeat orgs$174k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
21

Total granted

$305k
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+23%

Still filing today

64%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $104k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationCivil RightsPublic BenefitInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OG
    ONECHILD GLOBAL
    5× · 2019–2023 · $37k · revenue +30%
  • AI
    ANSWERS IN GENESIS INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +19%
  • GC
    Global Catalytic Network
    2× · 2023–2025 · $15k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • YW
    YOUTH WITH A MISSION
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • CC
    CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • MC
    MOKOKCHURY CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Faith Network
Human Services
2
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
3
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
4
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion
5
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
6
Great Commission Media Ministries-Usa

Non-denominational missions organization taking the gospel to russia, asia and middle east using television, radio and the internet. also ministering to churches throughout the united states.

Religion
7
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
8
Far Reaching Ministries

Far Reaching Ministries (FRM) was founded to carry the Gospel Jesus Christ to the world with discipleship as our primary objective. We plant and edify evangelical churches, found Bible schools, gather intimate small groups, and sustain…

International
9
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
10
Explore God Network
—
11
Good News Publishers

Crossway is a not-for-profit Christian publishing ministry of Good News Publishers that exists to proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ through publishing and other means, in order, by God's grace: to bring people to Christ as their Lord and…

—
12
Ambassadors for Christ International - Usa Inc

Ambassadors for Christ International - USA is a fellowship of gospel preachers and teachers whose mission is to preach Christ, edify the Church, and to glorify God and serve as a catalyst for revival, evangelism, and training of Christians…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Policy Alliance Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Foreign Mission Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOISE RESCUE MISSION: $60,161 · OtherBOISE RESCUE MISSIONO C INTERNATIONAL INC: $54,621 · OtherO C INTERNATIONAL INCBETHESDA MINISTRIES: $33,285 · OtherBETHESDA MINISTRIESYOUTH WITH A MISSION: $20,100 · OtherYOUTH WITH A MISSIONFUN IN THE SON MINISTRIES (CAMP TABLE ROCK): $16,000 · OtherFUN IN THE SON MINISTRIES (CAMP TABLE ROCK)CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $10,215 · OtherFOREIGN MISSION FOUNDATION: $9,850 · OtherMOKOKCHURY CHURCH: $8,845 · Other+16 more: $32,700 · Other+16 morePrecept: $95,000 · ReligionPreceptEVANGELISM RESOURCES INC: $25,000 · ReligionEVANGELISM RESOURCES INCANSWERS IN GENESIS INC: $20,000 · ReligionANSWERS IN GENESIS INCSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $6,000 · Religion+1 more: $750 · ReligionONECHILD GLOBAL: $37,165 · InternationalIDAHO LEARNING CENTER: $18,380 · EducationNORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC: $7,500 · EducationThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $1,000 · EducationGlobal Catalytic Network: $15,400 · Public Safety & DisasterJEMFRIENDS INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY POLICY ALLIANCE: $2,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $500 · Human ServicesALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $1,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE INC: $500 · Civil RightsFAMILY POLICY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $500 · Public Benefit
Other$245,777Religion$146,750International$37,165Education$26,880Public Safety & Disaster$15,400Human Services$5,500Civil Rights$1,500Public Benefit$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPrecept: $95,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetONECHILD GLOBAL: $37,165 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetANSWERS IN GENESIS INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO LEARNING CENTER: $18,380 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetGlobal Catalytic Network: $15,400 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFOREIGN MISSION FOUNDATION: $9,850 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreat Commission Foundation In: $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJONI AND FRIENDS: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEMFRIENDS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY POLICY ALLIANCE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY POLICY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThru The Bible Inc: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVEST MINISTRIES INC: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Precept ↗
  • Who funds ONECHILD GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds EVANGELISM RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds ANSWERS IN GENESIS INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Global Catalytic Network ↗
  • Who funds FOREIGN MISSION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Great Commission Foundation In ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds JONI AND FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds JEMFRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY POLICY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY POLICY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Thru The Bible Inc ↗
  • Who funds HARVEST MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO23.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · G II Charities · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jerry & Muriel Caven Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jerry & Muriel Caven Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jerry & Muriel Caven Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Jerry & Muriel Caven Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jerry & Muriel Caven’s filings →

    More from the funding graph