Skip to content
Jerome B Miller Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jerome B Miller Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$950k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$210k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$883kHealth$251kEducation$216kHuman Services$150kPublic Benefit$121kHousing & Shelter$89kRecreation & Sports$20kReligion$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $247k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $672k
$10,100
Median grant
9
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
B H FOXY FOUNDATION$210,000
HERITAGE HALL$188,020
PHILADELPHIA FIGHT$100,000
SARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC$74,000
TROMBONE SHORTY FOUNDATION$45,000
OKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$33,000
POSITIVE TOMORROWS$26,500
B H FOXY FOUNDATION$20,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF OKLAHOMA CITY$17,500
CLEATS FOR KIDS$15,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$15,000
OKLAHOME K-LIFE FOUNDATION$15,000
BETHANY PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$10,100
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ANGELS FOSTER FAMILY NETWORK: $10k → 11%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%HOPE CENTER: $10k → 15%ANGELS FOSTER FAMILY NETWORK: $5k → 11%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 16%CLEATS FOR KIDS: $15k → 16%CLEATS FOR KIDS: $5k → 16%PROJECT 66: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MA
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
MD
AZ
KS
NC
DC
OK
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 18 repeat orgs$513k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$1.4M
$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+29%

Still filing today

78%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $365k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    B H FOXY FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $250k · revenue +132% · 98% of their budget
  • TT
    THE TROY ANDREWS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $145k · revenue +6%
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $68k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $70k
  • EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +29%
  • P6
    PROJECT 66 INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
2
Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc

Community action project of tulsa county inc.'s (cap tulsa) mission is to help young children in lower-income families grow up and achieve economic success.

Human Services
3
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Kansas City Inc

The mission of ronald mcdonald house charities of kansas city is to provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

Health
4
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Greater Washongton Dc Inc

Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater washington, dc (rmhcdc) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

Health
5
Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc

The mission of the okcfjc is to provide protection, hope and healing to those impacted by domestic and family violence in the oklahoma city community. the organization provides a centrally located facility which co-locates and coordinates…

Crime & Legal
6
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Greater Cincinnati Inc

Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater cincinnati offers a community of compassion, support and the comforts of home to families with critically ill children, steps away from the medical care they need.

Human Services
7
Oklahoma City University

Inspired by a culture of creativity, Oklahoma City University fosters an immersive, personalized experience that welcomes and prepares students to pursue boundless opportunities.

Education
8
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
9
Habitat for Humanity of Okaloosa County Inc

Okaloosa habitat for humanity is a non-profit, christian organization dedicated to eliminating substandard housing in okaloosa county. we provide opportunites for the community to show god's love in action. through partnership with people…

Housing & Shelter
10
Healthy Schools Oklahoma Inc

Provide instruction for children in schools related to healthy lifestyle choices.

—
11
City Care Inc

City care inspires those willing to look social injustice and extreme proverty in the face, and empowers them to do whatever it takes to create change.

Human Services
12
Oklahoma Christian Academy Inc

Establish, maintain, and conduct a school for the instruction and training of youth.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Positive Tomorrows Inc; the most unlike its peers is Habitat for Humanity of Archuleta County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HERITAGE HALL: $280,300 · OtherHERITAGE HALLPHILADELPHIA FIGHT: $120,000 · OtherPHILADELPHIA FIGHTIndividual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $68,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF OKLAHOMA…+19 more: $172,330 · Other+19 moreB H FOXY FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · Arts & CultureB H FOXY FOUNDATION INCTHE TROY ANDREWS FOUNDATION: $145,000 · Arts & CultureTHE TROY ANDREWS FOUNDATIONSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $125,000 · Arts & CultureSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA+1 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureHERITAGE HALL SCHOOL INC: $188,020 · EducationHERITAGE HALL SCHOOL IN…UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $141,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA …OKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $43,000 · EducationOKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SC…+1 more: $10,100 · EducationPHILADELPHIA FIGHT: $100,000 · HealthRonald McDonald House Global: $15,000 · HealthCLEATS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Human ServicesANGELS FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY: $15,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT 66 INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOPE CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSOURI AND KANSAS: $5,000 · Human ServicesPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $36,500 · Youth DevelopmentOKLAHOMA YOUTH LITERACY PROGRAM: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC: $20,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$710,630Arts & Culture$530,000Education$382,120Health$115,000Human Services$65,000Youth Development$41,500Housing & Shelter$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetB H FOXY FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 2y, 98% of budgetHERITAGE HALL SCHOOL INC: $188,020 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE TROY ANDREWS FOUNDATION: $145,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $141,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $125,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetPHILADELPHIA FIGHT: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $68,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $43,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $36,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ARCHULETA COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCLEATS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10,100 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetPROJECT 66 INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE HOPE CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKIMMEL CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSOURI AND KANSAS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $4,880 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS ACROSS AMERICA: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPATRIOT PROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Communi…Servant FoundationMcLaughlin Family Fou…Harris Foundation IncEl and Thelma Gaylord…American Fidelity Fou…Communities Foundatio…Enterprise Holdings F…Fred Jones Family Fou…Crowe & Dunlevy Found…Oge Energy Corp Found…Love Meyer Family Fou…
Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · McLaughlin Family Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Fred Jones Family Foundation · Crowe & Dunlevy Foundation Inc · Oge Energy Corp Foundation Inc · Love Meyer Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jerome B Miller Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jerome B Miller Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 52%
  • Sunbeam Family Services Inc: 52% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jerome B Miller Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home