Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jerome B Miller Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$950k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$210k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Arts & Culture$883kHealth$251kEducation$216kHuman Services$150kPublic Benefit$121kHousing & Shelter$89kRecreation & Sports$20kReligion$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $247k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $672k
$10,100
Median grant
9
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
B H FOXY FOUNDATION$210,000
HERITAGE HALL$188,020
PHILADELPHIA FIGHT$100,000
SARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC$74,000
TROMBONE SHORTY FOUNDATION$45,000
OKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$33,000
POSITIVE TOMORROWS$26,500
B H FOXY FOUNDATION$20,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF OKLAHOMA CITY$17,500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$15,000
OKLAHOME K-LIFE FOUNDATION$15,000
CLEATS FOR KIDS$15,000
BETHANY PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$10,100
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ARCHULETA COUNTY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ANGELS FOSTER FAMILY NETWORK: $10k → 11%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%HOPE CENTER: $10k → 15%ANGELS FOSTER FAMILY NETWORK: $5k → 11%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 16%CLEATS FOR KIDS: $15k → 16%CLEATS FOR KIDS: $5k → 16%PROJECT 66: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MA
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
MD
AZ
KS
NC
DC
OK
LA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 18 repeat orgs$513k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$1.4M
$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+39%

Still filing today

78%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $365k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    B H FOXY FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $250k · revenue +132% · 98% of their budget
  • TT
    THE TROY ANDREWS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $145k · revenue +6%
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $68k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $70k
  • EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +29%
  • P6
    PROJECT 66 INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

2
Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc

Community action project of tulsa county inc.'s (cap tulsa) mission is to help young children in lower-income families grow up and achieve economic success.

Human Services
3
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Kansas City Inc

The mission of ronald mcdonald house charities of kansas city is to provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

Health
4
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Greater Washongton Dc Inc

Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater washington, dc (rmhcdc) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

Health
5
Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc

The mission of the okcfjc is to provide protection, hope and healing to those impacted by domestic and family violence in the oklahoma city community. the organization provides a centrally located facility which co-locates and coordinates…

Crime & Legal
6
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Greater Cincinnati Inc

Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater cincinnati offers a community of compassion, support and the comforts of home to families with critically ill children, steps away from the medical care they need.

Human Services
7
Oklahoma City University

Inspired by a culture of creativity, Oklahoma City University fosters an immersive, personalized experience that welcomes and prepares students to pursue boundless opportunities.

Education
8
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
9
Habitat for Humanity of Okaloosa County Inc

Okaloosa habitat for humanity is a non-profit, christian organization dedicated to eliminating substandard housing in okaloosa county. we provide opportunites for the community to show god's love in action. through partnership with people…

Housing & Shelter
10
Healthy Schools Oklahoma Inc

Provide instruction for children in schools related to healthy lifestyle choices.

11
City Care Inc

City care inspires those willing to look social injustice and extreme proverty in the face, and empowers them to do whatever it takes to create change.

Human Services
12
Oklahoma Christian Academy Inc

Establish, maintain, and conduct a school for the instruction and training of youth.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Positive Tomorrows Inc and the most unlike its peers is Habitat for Humanity of Archuleta County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-8 SchoolsClassical Music EnsemblesCancer Support OrganizationsPublic School District Foun…Homeless Services & ShelterAffordable Housing Developm…Child and Family ServicesFood Pantries & AssistanceChristian Youth CampsVeteran Support ServicesPublic University Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%21%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%30%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 21% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,537

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
17/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HERITAGE HALL — $280,300 · OtherHERITAGE HALLPHILADELPHIA FIGHT — $120,000 · OtherPHILADELPHIA FIGHTIndividual grant recipient — $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC — $68,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF OKLAHOMA…+19 more — $172,330 · Other+19 moreB H FOXY FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 · Arts & CultureB H FOXY FOUNDATION INCTHE TROY ANDREWS FOUNDATION — $145,000 · Arts & CultureTHE TROY ANDREWS FOUNDATIONSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $125,000 · Arts & CultureSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA+1 more — $10,000 · Arts & CultureHERITAGE HALL SCHOOL INC — $188,020 · EducationHERITAGE HALL SCHOOL IN…UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $141,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA …OKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $43,000 · EducationOKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SC…+1 more — $10,100 · EducationPHILADELPHIA FIGHT — $100,000 · HealthRonald McDonald House Global — $15,000 · HealthCLEATS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Human ServicesANGELS FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY — $15,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT 66 INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOPE CENTER INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSOURI AND KANSAS — $5,000 · Human ServicesPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC — $36,500 · Youth DevelopmentOKLAHOMA YOUTH LITERACY PROGRAM — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC — $20,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$710,630Arts & Culture$530,000Education$382,120Health$115,000Human Services$65,000Youth Development$41,500Housing & Shelter$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetB H FOXY FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 over 2y, 98% of budgetHERITAGE HALL SCHOOL INC — $188,020 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE TROY ANDREWS FOUNDATION — $145,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $141,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $125,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetPHILADELPHIA FIGHT — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC — $68,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $43,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC — $36,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCLEATS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ARCHULETA COUNTY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN — $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY — $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC — $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $10,100 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetPROJECT 66 INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetKIMMEL CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOPE CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSOURI AND KANSAS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC — $4,880 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS ACROSS AMERICA — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPATRIOT PROJECT — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · McLaughlin Family Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Fred Jones Family Foundation · Crowe & Dunlevy Foundation Inc · Oge Energy Corp Foundation Inc · Love Meyer Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jerome B Miller Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 52%
  • Sunbeam Family Services Inc52% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph