Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jerold a & Ruth L Hecktman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$93kPhilanthropy$93kEducation$53kArts & Culture$44kHealth$17kHuman Services$3kCommunity Improvement$3kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k33 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$250
Median grant
5
States reached
$639k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUF$15,000
SPERTUS INSTITUTE$10,000
GENESYS WORKS$5,000
CHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$5,000
TEMPLE BETH-EL$3,700
Individual grant recipient$2,650
BRIARWOOD SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$1,975
TOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA$1,600
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$995
GIVING BACK FUND (TRIBE OF NOVA)$500
CAMP ONE STEP$500
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE WEST$500
DESERT MOUNTAIN CARE$400
FRIENDS OF ISREAL DEFENSE FORCES$360
HADASSAH$288
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RAINBOW ANIMAL ASSISTED THERAPY: $100 → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $250 → 14%JEWISH CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $225 → 14%JEWISH CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $225 → 14%SHALVA: $200 → 14%SHALVA: $180 → 14%SHALVA: $80 → 14%CHICAGO HELP INITIATIVE: $200 → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
KS
TN
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$374k · 52 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

52 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
56

Total granted

$374k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+30%

Still filing today

54%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CW
    CANCER WELLNESS CENTER
    7× · 2018–2025 · $7k · revenue +100%
  • BS
    BRIARWOOD SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +56%
  • CB
    COLLEGE BOUND OPPORTUNITIES
    3× · 2021–2024 · $2k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • WB
    WORLD BUSINESS CHICAGOgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +58%
  • IG
    IMPACT GRANTS CHICAGOgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +26%
  • OA
    ORT AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
2
The Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma Research Foundation

The adenoid cyctic carcinoma research foundation (accrf) supports research into adenoid cystic carcinoma that will accelerate the development of improved therapies and a cure for the disease.

Health
3
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
4
Leonard and Diane Sherman Family Foundation

The foundation is organized to foster, promote, support, develop, encourage and maintain the broad charitable, educational and/or religious purpose of, the jewish federation of metropolitan chicago, and the foundation as authorized in…

Philanthropy
5
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
6
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
7
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
8
Chicago Center for Jewish Genetic Disorders

The norton & elaine sarnoff center for jewish genetics (the center) is an educational resource for hereditary cancers and jewish genetic disorders. working closely with clergy, health care professionals, support organizations and dedicated…

Health
9
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
10
Jewish Communal Fund

To facilitate and promote philanthropy through donor advised funds.

Philanthropy
11
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
12
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Juliana Greenfield Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 128 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
70/71
Grantees still filing
48/71
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JUF: $97,583 · OtherJUFSPERTUS INSTITUTE: $82,010 · OtherSPERTUS INSTITUTEGENESYS WORKS: $44,000 · OtherGENESYS WORKSTEMPLE BETH-EL: $20,600 · OtherTEMPLE BETH-ELIndividual grant recipient: $18,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLATIN SCHOOL: $15,102 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,047 · Other+79 more: $35,764 · Other+79 moreCHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $33,750 · EducationCHICAGO PUBL…BRIARWOOD SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $6,125 · EducationBRIARWOOD SC…COLLEGE BOUND OPPORTUNITIES: $2,200 · Education+2 more: $600 · EducationCANCER WELLNESS CENTER: $6,883 · HealthTOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,600 · HealthChildrens Oncology Services Inc: $860 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $750 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $600 · HealthLUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Health+12 more: $2,150 · HealthJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE WEST: $3,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACT GRANTS CHICAGO: $1,000 · PhilanthropyDAN GIBBONS TURKEY TROT FOUNDATION NFP: $500 · PhilanthropyThe Juliana Greenfield Family Foundation: $250 · Philanthropy+4 more: $400 · PhilanthropyHELPING HANDS NETWORK INC: $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentBACK 2 SCHOOL AMERICA: $700 · Youth DevelopmentMACCABI USA INC: $1,500 · Recreation & SportsKABOOM INC: $100 · Recreation & SportsNSSRA FOUNDATION: $100 · Recreation & SportsJewish Child and Family Services: $700 · Human ServicesSHALVA INC: $460 · Human ServicesTHE CHICAGO HELP INITIATIVE: $200 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $200 · Human ServicesRAINBOW ANIMAL ASSISTED THERAPY INC: $100 · Human Services
Other$328,356Education$42,675Health$13,343Philanthropy$7,150Youth Development$2,200Recreation & Sports$1,700Human Services$1,660

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $33,750 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCANCER WELLNESS CENTER: $6,883 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBRIARWOOD SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $6,125 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE WEST: $3,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE BOUND OPPORTUNITIES: $2,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMACCABI USA INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD BUSINESS CHICAGO: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS NETWORK INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT GRANTS CHICAGO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetORT AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildrens Oncology Services Inc: $860 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKESHET: $804 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC: $800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAMBS FARM INC: $775 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $750 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $744 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Child and Family Services: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBACK 2 SCHOOL AMERICA: $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC: $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAN GIBBONS TURKEY TROT FOUNDATION NFP: $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $475 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHALVA INC: $460 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRORY DAVID DEUTSCH FOUNDATION: $400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $325 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Juliana Greenfield Family Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE FOREST PRESERVES: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE THRESHOLDS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH SACRED SOCIETY INC: $225 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHICAGO HELP INITIATIVE: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BUDDY FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY ROLLMAN OVARIAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI Chicago: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT VEST SIDE CLUB OF CHICAGO: $200 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE NATIONAL FRAGILE X FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONMOUTH ROSEVILLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $200 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CANCER WELLNESS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BRIARWOOD SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE WEST ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE BOUND OPPORTUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MACCABI USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD BUSINESS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT GRANTS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds ORT AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Childrens Oncology Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds KESHET ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LAMBS FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Child and Family Services ↗
  • Who funds BACK 2 SCHOOL AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL20.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · First Bank Chicago Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Motorola Solutions Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Sam I Am Foundation · Howard & Roberta Goss Charitable Foundat · The Bill Bass Foundation · Jbs Foundation · The Sidley Austin Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jerold a & Ruth L Hecktman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jerold a & Ruth L Hecktman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Jewish Association for Residential Care Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 128 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jerold a & Ruth L Hecktman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph